Evaluation of external root resorption concomitant with maxillary canine retraction assisted by micro-osteoperforation using a cone beam computed tomography

Clinical study

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5nS1.14837

Authors

  • Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed Salim Assistant Professor, Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt
  • Hussein Shokry Hassan Ahmed Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Assiut, Al-Azhar University, Egypt
  • Mostafa Mohamed Mahmoud Dawaba Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Assiut, Al-Azhar University, Egypt
  • Ahmed Ibrahim Elblhasy Researcher at Orthodontic Department, Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt
  • Shady Ahmed Moussa Lecturer of Pediatric Dentistry, Zagazig University, Egypt
  • Mohamed A. Said Lecturer of Orthodontics, Ahram Canadian University, Cairo, Egypt

Keywords:

canine retraction, Accelerated orthodontics

Abstract

Aim: to calculate the impact of external apical root resorption (EARR) assisted by micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) throughout maxillary canine retraction. Patients and Methods: twenty cases; fifteen girls, five males (average age: 18.66 ± 3.27 years) who required as part of their treatment strategy, the extraction of at least one maxillary first premolar. They were received adjunctive therapy with MOPs. EARR was measured from CBCT before and after canine retraction. All gathered data will be tallied and subjected to statistical analysis. Results: A comparison between pre-treatment and post-retraction canine length with microosteoperforations (MOPs) showed that there was non-significant difference regarding root resorption. Conclusion: There was no remarkable effect on root resorption of the canine as the microsteoperforation facilitate the canine movement and reduced the whole retraction time.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lee WC. (1990). Experimental study of the effect of prostaglandin administration on tooth movement – With particular emphasis on the relationship to the method of PGE1 administration. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 98:231–41.

Yamasaki K. (1983). The role of cyclic AMP, calcium, and prostaglandins in the induction of osteoclastic bone resorption associated with experimental tooth movement. J Dent Res; 62:877–81.

Al-Naoum F, Hajeer MY, Al-Jundi A. (2014). Does alveolar corticotomy accelerate orthodontic tooth movement when retracting upper canines? A split-mouth design randomized controlled trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 72:1880–9.

Iglesias-Linares A, Hartsfield JK Jr. (2017). Cellular and molecular pathways leading to external root resorption. J Dent Res. 96:145–52. DOI: 10.1177/0022034516677539. PMID: 27811065. PMCID: PMC5331617.

Wahab RM, Dasor MM, Senafi S, Abdullah AA, Jemain AA, Kasim NA, et al. (2011). Crevicular tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase activity and rate of tooth movement under different continuous force applications. Afr J Pharm Pharmacol; 5:2213–9.

Lowney JJ, Norton LA, Shafer DM, Rossomando EF. (1995). Orthodontic forces increase tumor necrosis factor alpha in the human gingival sulcus. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 108:519–24.

Chan E, Dalci O, Petocz P, Papadopoulou AK, Darendeliler MA. (2018). Physical properties of root cementum: Part 26.Effects of micro-osteoperforations on orthodontic root resorption: A microcomputed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 153:204–13.

Dos Santos CC, Mecenas P, de Castro Aragón ML, Normando D. (2020). Effects of micro-osteoperforations performed with Propel system on tooth movement, pain/quality of life, anchorage loss, and root resorption: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Orthod;21:27.

Alikhani M, Raptis M, Zoldan B, Sangsuwon C, Lee YB, Alyami B, et al. (2013). Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 144:639–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.06.017. PMID: 24182579.

Lopatiene, K., & Dumbravaite, A. (2008). Risk factors of root resorption after orthodontic treatment. Stomatologija, 10(3), 89-95.‏

Sherrard JF1, Rossouw PE, Benson BW, Carrillo R, Buschang PH. (2010). Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 137:S100-8.

Alikhani M, Alansari S, Sangsuwon C, Alikhani M, Chou M, Alyami B, Nervina J, Teixeira C. (2015). Micro-osteoperforations: Minimally invasive accelerated tooth movement. Semin Orthod; 21:162-169.

Kalemaj Z, DebernardI CL, Buti J. 2015; Efficacy of surgical and non-surgical interventions on accelerating orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 8:9–24.

Gibreal O, Hajeer MY, Brad B. (2019). Efficacy of piezocision-based flapless corticotomy in the orthodontic correction of severely crowded lower anterior teeth: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod.; 41:188–95.

Ruso S, Campbell PM, Rossmann J, Opperman LA, Taylor RW, Buschang PH. (2014). Bone response to buccal tooth movements-with and without flapless alveolar decortication. Eur J Orthod; 36:613–23.

Shahabee M, Shafaee H, Abtahi M, Rangrazi A, Bardideh E. (2020). Effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement-a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod; 42:211–21.

Agrawal AA, Kolte AP, Kolte RA, Vaswani V, Shenoy U, Rathi P. (2019). Comparative CBCT analysis of the changes in buccal bone morphology after corticotomy and micro-osteoperforations assisted orthodontic treatment – Case series with a split mouth design. Saudi Dent J; 31:58–65.

Khursheed Alam M, Hashem AS, Elkalza AR. (2018). Comparative study of root resorption between two methods for accelerated orthodontic tooth movement. J Oral Res; 5:348–53.

Published

27-07-2021

How to Cite

Salim, M. A. M. A., Ahmed, H. S. H., Dawaba, M. M. M., Elblhasy, A. I., Moussa, S. A., & Said, M. A. (2021). Evaluation of external root resorption concomitant with maxillary canine retraction assisted by micro-osteoperforation using a cone beam computed tomography: Clinical study. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(S1), 917–925. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5nS1.14837

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)