Comparative evaluation of treatment effects between two fixed functional appliances for correction of class II malocclusion
A prospective clinical study
Keywords:
Forsus, Advancsync 2, Class 2 malocclusion, fixed functional appliancesAbstract
Objectives: to compare dental and skeletal effects produced by Forsus Fatigue Resistance Appliance and Advancesync II Appliance in patients with class II malocclusion. Patients and methods: The current study was conducted on 20 orthodontic patients with an age range from 14- to 16-year-old who were collected from the outpatient clinic at Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt. They were separated at random into two equal groups; each consisted of 10 patients, Group 1: Patients treated with molar to canine fixed functional appliance. Group 2: Patients treated with molar to molar fixed functional appliances. Results: results showed non statistically significant difference between both groups. Conclusion: a statistically significant differences were found in dentoalveolar parameters with statistically non significance difference in skeletal parameters.
Downloads
References
Suresh M, Akurathi R, Vivekanand SK, Shameem K. One Phase versus Two Phase Treatment i n Mixed Dentition: A Critical Review. J Int Oral Health. 2015; 7: 144–147.
Proffit WR. Malocclusion and dentofacial deformity in contemporary society. In: Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM, Larson BE. Contemporary Orthodontics. Elsevier; 2019:8.
Vaibava SK, Gnanashanmugam, Kannan MS. Interceptive Orthodontics – A review. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine. 2020;7 :1757-1761.
Zhou L, Mok CW, Hagg U, et al. Anteroposterior dental arch and jaw base relationships in a population sample. Angle Orthod. 2008;78; 1023–1029.
Tulloch JF, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Outcomes in 2-phase randomized clinical trial of early Class II treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;125:657–667.
Marsico E, Gatto E, Burrascano M, Matrese G, Cordasco G. Effectiveness of orthodontic treatment with functional appliances on mandibular growth in the short term. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 139:24–36.
Tulloch JF, Phillips C, Proffit WR. Benefit of early Class II treatment: progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:62–72.
Giuntini V, Baccetti T, Defraia E, et al. Mesial rotation of upper first molars in Class II division 1 malocclusion in the mixed dentition: a controlled blind study. Prog Orthod. 2011;12:107–113.
Ow A, Cheung LK. Skeletal stability and complications of bilateral sagittal split osteotomies and mandibular distraction osteogenesis: an evidenced-based review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:2344–2353.
Hägg U, Rabie ABM, Bendeus M, et al. Condylar growth and mandibular positioning with stepwise versus maximum jumping. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:525–536.
Meikle M. what do prospective randomized clinical trials tell us about the treatment of Class II malocclusions?. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27:105–114.
Björk A. Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res. 1963;42:400–411.
Marsico E, Gatto E, Burrascano M, Matrese G, Cordasco G. Effectiveness of orthodontic treatment with functional appliances on mandibular growth in the short term . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 139:24–36.
O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, et al. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter randomized, controlled trial, part 1: dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:234–243.
Tulloch JF, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Outcomes in 2-phase randomized clinical trial of early Class II treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;125:657–667.
O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, et al. Early treatment for Class II division 1 malocclusion with the Twin-block appliance: a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135:573–579.
Hisham M, Emina Č, Mumen ZR, Vaska V. Effectiveness of prefabricated myofunctional appliances in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion: a systematic review. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2020;47:125–134.
Harun A, Nurul M, Yunita FR. A Systematic Review of Oral Myofunctional Therapy, Methods and Development of Class II Skeletal Malocclusion Treatment in Children. Sys Rev Pharm. 2020; 11(6): 511 521.
Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2021). Health and treatment of diabetes mellitus. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(1), i-v. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5n1.2864
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
