Efficiency of different miniscrew positions for maxillary incisor intrusion: A comparative cone beam study
Keywords:
maxillary incisors, intrusion, cone-beam computed tomographyAbstract
Aim: To evaluate the treatment efficacy of two different position of mini-implant-assisted methods to intrude the maxillary incisors using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Patients and Methods: The study included 26 patients with elongated maxillary incisors and a deep bite, ranging in age from 12 to 18 years. One group received anterior mini-implants, whereas the other received posterior ones at random. The AMG used elastic chains to apply about 40 g of force per side, while the PMG used beta-titanium wires. This investigation used CBCT scans that were performed before and after an intrusion that lasted 18 weeks. Result: Significant changes in the labial inclination of all incisors, which were greater in PMG than AMG. Conclusion: Both mechanics result in increased labial tilting, but posterior mini-implants assisted maxillary incisor intrusion is greater, so it is preferred when the patient's incisors is upright position.
Downloads
References
Aras I, Tuncer AV. Comparison of anterior and posterior mini-implant-assisted maxillary incisor intrusion: Root resorption and treatment efficiency. The Angle Orthodontist. 2016;86(5):746-52.
Årtun J, Smale I, Behbehani F, Doppel D, Van't Hof M, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Apical root resorption six and 12 months after initiation of fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. The Angle Orthodontist. 2005;75(6):919-26.
Burstone CJ, editor Biomechanics of deep overbite correction. Seminars in orthodontics; 2001: Elsevier.
Burstone CR. Deep overbite correction by intrusion. American journal of orthodontics. 1977;72(1):1-22.
Costopoulos G, Nanda R. An evaluation of root resorption incident to orthodontic intrusion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1996;109(5):543-8.
Deguchi T, Murakami T, Kuroda S, Yabuuchi T, Kamioka H, Takano-Yamamoto T. Comparison of the intrusion effects on the maxillary incisors between implant anchorage and J-hook headgear. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 2008;133(5):654-60.
Gegler A, Fontanella V. In vitro evaluation of a method for obtaining periapical radiographs for diagnosis of external apical root resorption. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2008;30(3):315-9.
Goerigk B, Diedrich P, Wehrbein H. Intrusion of the anterior teeth with the segmented-arch technic of Burstone--a clinical study. Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie. 1992;53(1):16-25.
Kim T-W, Kim H, Lee S-J. Correction of deep overbite and gummy smile by using a mini-implant with a segmented wire in a growing Class II Division 2 patient. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 2006;130(5):676-85.
Lewis P. Correction of deep anterior overbite A report of three cases. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1987;91(4):342-5.
McFadden WM, Engstrom C, Engstrom H, Anholm JM. A study of the relationship between incisor intrusion and root shortening. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1989;96(5):390-6.
Ohnishi H, Yagi T, Yasuda Y, Takada K. A mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage in a deep overbite case. The Angle Orthodontist. 2005;75(3):444-52.
Polat-Özsoy Ö, Arman-Özçırpıcı A, Veziroğlu F, Çetinşahin A. Comparison of the intrusive effects of miniscrews and utility arches. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 2011;139(4):526-32.
Polat-Ozsoy O, Arman-Ozcirpici A, Veziroglu F. Miniscrews for upper incisor intrusion. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2009;31(4):412-6.
Şenışık NE, Türkkahraman H. Treatment effects of intrusion arches and mini-implant systems in deepbite patients. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 2012;141(6):723-33.
Upadhyay M, Nagaraj K, Yadav S, Saxena R. Mini-implants for en masse intrusion of maxillary anterior teeth in a severe Class II division 2 malocclusion. Journal of orthodontics. 2008;35(2):79-89.
Van Steenbergen E, Burstone C, Prahl-Andersen B, Aartman I. The influence of force magnitude on intrusion of the maxillary segment. The Angle Orthodontist. 2005;75(5):723-9.
van Steenbergen E, Burstone CJ, Prahl-Andersen B, Aartman IH. Influence of buccal segment size on prevention of side effects from incisor intrusion. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 2006;129(5):658-65.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
