A clinical comparative study of molar distalization using the bone anchored distalizer and the traditional tooth-supported distalizer

Ahmed Mahmoud Ahmed Ali; Saleh Anwar Elsayed Saleh; Mohamed Ahmed Salem; Usama Thabet Ahmed

doi:10.53730/ijhs.v5nS2.13682

Authors

Ahmed Mahmoud Ahmed Ali Assistant Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics Faculty of Dental Medicine Al-Azhar University (Assiut Branch)
Saleh Anwar Elsayed Saleh Professor of Orthodontics, Department of Orthodontics Faculty of Dental Medicine Al-Azhar University (Assiut Branch)
Mohamed Ahmed Salem Associate Professor of Orthodontic Alazhar University Assiut Branch
Usama Thabet Ahmed Lecturer of Orthodontics, Department of Orthodontics Faculty of Dental Medicine Al-Azhar University (Assiut Branch)

Keywords:

clinical comparative study, molar distalization, bone anchored distalizer, traditional tooth-supported distalizer

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to Clinical Comparative evaluation of the maxillary 1^st molars distalization by the Bone-Anchored Distalizer and the Traditional Tooth-Supported Distalizer. Patients and Methods: The sample was consisted of 20 patients (7 males and 13 females), 7 patients (3 Males and 4 females) for group A and 13 patients (4 males and 9 females) for group B. However, 2 of them discontinued the treatment due to different causes. As a result of this, the study was performed on 18 patients. The sample was selected from patients seeking orthodontic treatment in out- patient clinic, Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al- Azhar University, Assiut , Egypt. Patients was divided into two groups; Group (A): In this group, upper molar distalization was done with bone anchored distalizer (advanced molar distalization appliance AMDA, Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany) and Group (B): In this group, upper molar distalization was done with tooth supported distalizer (fast back appliance, leone, s.p.a, italy).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alkasaby A; Abdelnaby Y; Hammad S. Effects of Molar Distalization with the Fast Back Appliance, IJO,2013;24;4.

Burrow S. To extract or not to extract: A diagnostic decision, not a marketing decision. Am J Orthod Dento facial Orthop. 2008;133:341-342.

Bussick T, & McNamara J.Jr. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117(3):333-343.

Caprioglio A, Beretta M, & Lanteri C.Maxillary. molardistalization: PendulumandFastBack, comparisonbetweentwo approachesforClass II malocclusion. Prog Orthod. 2011;12(1):8-16.

Chung K, Park Y, & Ko S. C- the first premolars for the two distalization. J Clin Orthod 2000;34(1):32-39.

Fontana M, Cozzani M, & Caprioglio A. Non-compliance maxillary molar distalizing appliances: an overview of the last decade. Prog Orthod. 2012;13(2):173-184.

Fortini A, Lupoli M, Giuntoli F, Franchi L. Dentoskeletal effects induced by rapid molar distalization with the first class appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Jun;125(6):697-704.

Fuziy A, Almeida R, Janson G, Angelieri F, & Pinzan A. Sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization withthe pendulum appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130(4):502- 510.

Ghosh J, & Nanda R. Evaluation of an intraoral maxillary molar distalization technique. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110(6):639- 646.

Gumus A, & Arat Z. A removable Class II appliance for simultaneous distalization and expansion. J Clin Orthod. 2005;39(10):613-617.

Itoh T, Tokuda T, Kiyosue S, Hirose T, Matsumoto M, & Chaconas S. Molar distalization with repelling magnets. J Clin Orthod 1991;25(10):611-617.

Jones R, & White J. Rapid Class II molar correction with an open-coil jig. J Clin Orthod 1992;26(10):661- 664.

Keles A, & Sayinsu K. A new approach in maxillary molar distalization: intraoral bodily molar distalizer. Am J Orthod DentofacialOrthop. 2000;117(1):39-48.

Keles A. Maxillary unilateral molar distalization with sliding mechanics: a preliminary investigation. EurJOrthod 2001;23(5):507-515.

Khoury S, Manso G, Rodríguez M, & Rivas Y. Evaluation of Belussi’s molar distalizer. (Evaluación del distalador molar Belussi). Rev Cubana Estomatol 2008;45:1-9.

Kucukkeles N, Cakirer B, & Mowafi M. Cephalometric evaluationofmolar distalization by hyrax screw used in conjunction with a lip bumper. World J Orthod 2006;7(3):261- 268.

Muse D, Fillman M, Emmerson W, & Mitchell R. Molar and incisor changes with Wilson rapid molar distalization. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104(6):556-565.

Ngantung V, Nanda R, & Bowman S. Post-treatment evaluation of the distal jet appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. OrthodDentofacialOrthop 1996;109(3):234-243.

Orton, Harry S. et al. “Distal movement of buccal segments with the "en masse" removable appliance: its value in treating patients with mild Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. Part II: the model measuring system and results.” Am J orthod dentofacial orthop: official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics 1094 (1996): 379-85.

Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1982;82(2):104-113.

Papadopoulos M, Tarawneh F. The use of mini-screw implants for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: A comprehensive review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103;5:6-15.

Papadopoulos M. The “Advanced Molar Distalization Appliance”: A Novel Approach to Correct Class II Malocclusion Recent Patentson Biomedical Engineering, 2010;3;1.

Proffit, W.R., Fields, H.W. and Sarver, D.M. (2007) Treatment of Skeletal Problems in Children. Contemporary Orthodontics. 4th Ed, Elsevier Mosbey, St Louis, Missouri; 2007:268-290

SchützeS,GedrangeT, ZellmannM,&HarzerW. Effectsofunilateralmolar distalization with a modified pendulumappliance.AmJ Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131(5):600-608.

Spaceregainerformolar 2001;120(2):178-185.