Evaluation of clear aligners attachment success rate with different composite types
Keywords:
evaluation, aligners attachment, composite typesAbstract
This study aimed to evaluate the survival rate of clear aligner attachment using different composite types. Twelve patients ranging from 15 to 25 years old participated in this research. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to one of two groups: packable composite, which contained packable composite attachments, or flowable composite, which included flowable composite attachments. There was no statistical difference in attachment failures between the two groups for all cases (2 = 3.003, P = 0.083) and individual cases. However, failures occurred in 75% of the FC group vs. 55.6% for the PC group (categorical data were compared using the Chi-Square or Fisher's exact test). According to the findings of this research, the composite type, whether packable or flowable, did not affect attachment failure.
Downloads
References
Barbagallo LJ, ShenG, JonesAS, Swain MV, Petocz P, Darendeliler MA. A novel pressure film approach for determining the force imparted by clear removable thermoplastic appliances. Ann Biomed Eng. 2008; 36:335-41.
Barbosa IV, Ladewig VM, Almeida-Pedrin RR, Cardoso MA, Santiago Junior JF, Conti A. The association between patient's compliance and age with the bonding failure of orthodontic brackets: a cross-sectional study. Prog Orthod.2018; 19(1):11.
Boyd RL. Predictability of successful orthodontic treatment using Invisalign. The Greater Philadelphia Society of Orthodontists page. [http://www.gpso.org/events/2003_outline.pdf.].
Bradley TG, Teske L, Eliades G, Zinelis S, Eliades T. Do the mechanical and chemical properties of Invisalign appliances change after use? A retrieval analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2015.
Cal-Neto JP, Quintao CA, Almeida MA, Miguel JA. Bond failure rates with a self-etching primer: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135: 782–6.
Hahn W, Dathe H, Fialka-Fricke J, Fricke-Zec S, Zapf A, Kubein-Meesenburg D, et al. Influence of thermoplastic appliance thickness on the magnitude of force delivered to a maxillary central incisor during tipping. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009; 136:12-17.
Hahn W, Engelke B, Jung K, Dathe H, Fialka-Fricke J, Kubein-Meesenburg D, et al. Initial forces and moments delivered by removable thermoplastic appliances during rotation of an upper central incisor. Angle Orthod. 2010; 80:239-46.
Hammad SM, El Banna MS, Elsaka SE. The twelve-month bracket failure rate with amorphous calcium phosphate bonding system. Eur J Orthod. 2013; 35:622–627.
Mohammed RE, Abass S, Abubakr NH, Mohammed ZM. Comparing orthodontic bond failures of light-cured composite resin with chemical-cured composite resin: a 12-month clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016; 150:290– 294.
Roelofs T, Merkens N, Roelofs J, Bronkhorst E, Breuning H. A retrospective survey of the causes of bracket- and tubebonding failures. Angle Orthod. 2017; 87:111–117.
Rossini G, Parrini S, Castroflorio T, Deregibus A, Debernadi CL. Efficacy of Clear-aligners in Controlling Orthodontic Tooth Movement - A Systematic Review, Angle Orthod. 2014, Nov 20.
Serin BA, Yazicioglu I, Deveci C, Dogan MC. Clinical evaluation of a self-adhering flowable composite as an occlusal restorative material in primary molars: one-year results. Eur Oral Res. 2019; 53:119–124.
Simon M, Keilig L, Schwarze J, Jung BA, Bourauel C. Forces and moments generated by removable thermoplastic aligners: incisor torque, premolar derotation, and molar distalization. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2014; 145:728-36.
Steiner R, Edelhoff D, Stawarczyk B, Dumfahrt H, Lente I. Effect of dentin bonding agents, various resin composites and curing modes on bond strength to human dentin. 2019; 12:3395.
Vardimon AD, Robbins D, Brosh T. In-vivo von Mises strains during Invisalign treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2010; 138:399-409.
Werner S, Julia H. Aligner Orthodontics, Quintessence Publishing Co. Ltd, London, UK. 2016; 2: 28.
Ziuchkovski JP, Fields HW, Johnston WM, Lindsey DT. Assessment of perceived orthodontic appliance attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008; 133:68-78.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
