Compare molar’s alveolar bone width and angulation changes between cleft lip and palate and non-cleft patients following transverse correction of maxillary hypoplasia

CBCT based study

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5nS2.14909

Authors

  • Mohsena Ahmad Abdarrazik Lecturer of Orthodontic, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Khaled Mohamad Taha Lecturer of Orthodontic, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Boys, Cairo, Al-Azhar University, Egypt
  • Taghreed Riyadh Alazzawi B.D.S Aleppo, Syria. M.S.D at Orthodontic Department Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Yasser Mohammad Elsayed Hassouna Lecturer-Military Medical Academy
  • Ibraheem Mahmoud Mwafey Ass. Professor of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Dental Radiology Faculty of Dentistry, Al-Azhar University (Assiut Branch), Egypt
  • Ibrahim Sabry El Sayed Lecturer of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Oral Radiology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Boys, Cairo, Al-Azhar University, Egypt
  • Ahmed Mohamed Elshamy Lecturer of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Oral Radiology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Boys, Cairo, Al-Azhar University, Egypt
  • Salam Mohamed EL Araby Lecturer of Pedodontics and Oral Health Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Abdelhamid Abuelyazid Eissa Lecturer of Pedodontics and Public Health, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Boys, Cairo, Al-Azhar University, Egypt
  • Sara Gonna Lecturer of Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Egypt

Keywords:

Cleft palate, Maxillary Hypoplasia, maxillary expansion, molar angulation

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare maxillary alveolar bone width in 1st molar region and molar angulation between growing individuals with Cleft Lip and Palate (CLP) and Non-Cleft Class III instances that received Rapid Maxillary Expansion (RME) as a treatment of maxillary hypoplasia. Subjects and Methods: This retrospective study included two groups, Cleft Group; 8 CLP patients and Non-Cleft Group; 12 Non-Cleft cases with maxillary hypoplasia. The children's ages spanned from 8 to 12 years old. The two groups received treatment consisting of maxillary expansion utilizing with RME protocol followed by 6 months of consolidation. Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) was taken prior therapy (T1) and following six months of expansion (T2). Results: In Cleft and Non-Cleft groups, the buccal alveolar bone width displayed statistically significant decline, however the palatal alveolar bone width displayed statistically significant increase. The molar angulation was increased significantly in the two groups. There were statistically non-significant variations in alveolar bone width and 1st molar angulation changes among Cleft and Non-Cleft groups. Conclusion: Patients with CLP have the same maxillary first molar angulation changes as well buccal and palatal alveolar bone width at molar area as non-cleft patients those have Class III malocclusion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kumar K, Kumar S, Mehrotra D, Gupta S, Khandpur S, Mishra RK. A Psychologic Assessment of the Parents of Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2020; 31:58-61.

Bezerra JF, Silva H.P.V.D, Bortolin RH, Luchessi AD, Ururahy MAG, Loureiro MB, et al. IRF6 polymorphisms in Brazilian patients with non-syndromic cleft lip with or without palate. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020; 86:696-702.

Van Dyck J, Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M, Willems G, Verdonck A. Dental development in cleft lip and palate patients: A systematic review. Forensic Sci Int. 2019; 300:63-74.

Lin X, Zhou N, Huang X, Song S, Li H. Anterior Maxillary Segmental Distraction Osteogenesis for Treatment of Maxillary Hypoplasia in Patients With Repaired Cleft Palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Jul;29(5):e480-e484.

Lindeborg MM, Shakya P, Rai SM, Shaye DA. Optimizing speech outcomes for cleft palate. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020; 28:206-11.

Jimenez LM, MalpartidaV, Rodríguez YA, Dias HL, Arriola LE. Midpalatal suture maturation stage assessment in adolescents and young adults using cone-beam computed tomography. Prog Orthod. 2019;8;20(1):38.

Seker ED, Yagci A, Kurt DK. Dental root development associated with treatments by rapid maxillary expansion/reverse headgear and slow maxillary expansion. Eur J Orthod. 2019;41:544-50.‏

Worth V, Perry R, Ireland T, Wills AK, Sandy J, Ness A. Are people with an orofacial cleft at a higher risk of dental caries? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br Dent J. 2017 Jul 7;223(1):37-47.

Huang J., Li C.-Y., Jiang J.-H. Facial soft tissue changes after nonsurgical rapid maxillary expansion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Head Face Med. 2018;14:6. .

Lemos Rinaldi M, Azeredo F, Martinelil de Lima E, Deon Rizzatto SM, Sameshima G, Macedo de Menezes L. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of bone plate and root length after maxillary expansion using tooth-borne and tooth-tissue-borne banded expanders. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2018;154:504–516.

Baysal A, Uysal T, Veli I, Ozer T, Karadede I, Hekimoglu S. Evaluation of alveolar bone loss following rapid maxillary expansion using cone-beam computed tomography. Korean J Orthod. 2013;43:83–95.

Digregorio M, Fastuca R, Zecca P, Caprioglio A, Lagravère M. Buccal bone plate thickness after rapid maxillary expansion in mixed and permanent dentitions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;155:198–206.

Lo Giudice A, Barbato E, Cosentino L, Ferraro C, Leonardi R. Alveolar bone changes after rapid maxillary expansion with tooth-born appliances: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2018;40:296–303.

Garib DG, Henriques JF, Janson G, de Freitas MR, Fernandes AY. Periodontal effects of rapid maxillary expansion with tooth-tissue-borne and tooth-borne expanders: a computed tomography evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;129:749–758.

Assiri H, Dawasaz AA, Alahmari A, Asiri Z. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in periodontal diseases: a Systematic review based on the efficacy model. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20:191.

Del Lhano NC, Ribeiro RA, Martins CC, Assis NMSP, Devito KL. Panoramic versus CBCT used to reduce inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia after third molar extractions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020;49:20190265.

De Almeida AM, Ozawa TO, Alves ACM, Janson G, Lauris JRP, Ioshida MSY, et al. Slow versus rapid maxillary expansion in bilateral cleft lip and palate: a CBCT randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2017; 21:1789-99.

Figueiredo DSF, Bartolomeo FUC, Romualdo CR, Palomo JM, Horta MCR, Andrade I, et al. Dentoskeletal effects of 3 maxillary expanders in patients with clefts: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2014; 146:73–81.

Yatabe M, Garib DG, Faco RAS, de Clerck H, Janson G, Nguyen T, Cevidanes LHS, Ruellas AC. Bone-anchored maxillary protraction therapy in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate: 3-dimensional assessment of maxillary effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Sep;152(3):327-35.

Gandedkar NH, Liou EJ The immediate effect of alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions on the alveolus: a retrospective cone beam computed tomography study. Prog Orthod. 2018 Oct 15;19(1):40-6

Sperl A, Gaalaas L, Beyer J, Grünheid T. Buccal alveolar bone changes following rapid maxillary expansion and fixed appliance therapy. Angle Orthod. 2021 Mar 1;91(2):171-177.

Shendy MA, Atwa AA, Abu Shahba R Y. Effect of rapid maxillary expansion on the buccal alveolar bone: clinical and radiographic evaluation Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science 2018:21;175-82.

Garib D, Lauris RC, Calil LR, Alves AC, Janson G, De Almeida AM, et al. Dentoskeletal outcomes of a rapid maxillary expander with differential opening in patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate: a prospective clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;150:564-74.

Lin Y, Fu Z, Ma L, Li W. Cone-beam computed tomography-synthesized cephalometric study of operated unilateral cleft lip and palate and noncleft children with Class III skeletal relationship.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Nov;150(5):802-810.

Wijdeveld MG, Maltha JC, Grupping EM, De Jonge J, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A histological study of tissue response to simulated cleft palate surgery at different ages in beagle dogs. Arch Oral Biol. 1991;36:837–43.

Christie KF, Boucher N, Chung CH. Effects of bonded rapid palatal expansion on the transverse dimensions of the maxilla: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop .2010; 137: 79-85.‏

De Medeiros A. C, Janson G, Mcnamara Jr. J. A, Lauris J. R. P, Garib D. G. Maxillary expander with differential opening vs Hyrax expander: A randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2020; 157: 7–18.

Published

27-10-2021

How to Cite

Abdarrazik, M. A., Taha, K. M., Alazzawi, T. R., Hassouna, Y. M. E., Mwafey, I. M., El Sayed, I. S., Elshamy, A. M., EL Araby, S. M., Eissa, A. A., & Gonna, S. (2021). Compare molar’s alveolar bone width and angulation changes between cleft lip and palate and non-cleft patients following transverse correction of maxillary hypoplasia: CBCT based study. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(S2), 1390–1401. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5nS2.14909

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)