Chemicomechanical caries removal in primary molars: Evaluation of shear bond strength of modified glass ionomer restorations

An in vitro study

Authors

  • Salam Mohamed El Araby Lecturer of Pedodontics and Oral Health department, Faculty of Dental Midicine Girls branch AL -Azhar University
  • Mohammad El Sayed Moteea Lecturer of pedodontics and oral health, Department of pedodontics and oral health ,Al Azhar university, Assuit branch
  • Alaa Nabil Abbas Lecturer of Pedodontics and Oral Health Department Faculty of Dental medicine (Cairo -Boys) Al-Azhar University
  • Abdelhamid Abuelyazid Eissa Lecturer of of pedodontic and public health department faculty of dental medicine alazhar university
  • Yousef Hamed Abokhlifa Assistant Professor of pediatrics Dentistry and Dental public health, faculty of dental medicine AL-Azhar University IN Cairo, Egypt
  • Tamer Abdellatif Elmansy Faculty of Dental medicine (Boys), Al Azhar university
  • Mahmoud Abdellah Ahmed Refaei Lecturer in dental materials department at faculty of dentistry Al azhar university in Assiut
  • Hosam Muhammad Elsayed Lecturer of dental biomaterial department -Alazhar university Assiut branch
  • Ahmed Ramadan Elmanakhly Lecturer in Operative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Al–Azhar University (boys-Cairo)
  • Ahmed Ata Abd El-ghany Assistant Professor of Operative Dentistry Al-Azhar University (Assiut)

Keywords:

papacarie duo, silver modified glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer cement, shear bond strength

Abstract

The recent trend in pediatric dentistry is tending towards minimal invasive materials and techniques. Aim: To evaluate and compare shear bond strength of three modified glass ionomer restorations  (GIRs) to dentin of primary molars after removal of caries via Papacarie Duo (a Chemicomechanical caries removal material CMCR). Materials and methods: 45 deciduous molars with occlusal carious cavity Samples were randomly divided into three groups, i.e., groups I , II , III  and were restored with Riva silver glass ionomer , light cure (LC) Riva glass ionomer , and Riva bulk fill hybrid glass ionomer respectively. Shear bond strength was determined. Results: It was found that the shear bond strength was highest in group III treated with Papacarie restored with Riva bulk fill hybrid glass ionomer (11.32± 3.15) MPa, followed by group II  treated with papacarie restored with light cured glass ionomer riva (5.53±3.33), with the lowest value  (3.87±1.5) recorded in Gp I treated with papacarie restored with riva silver reinforced glass ionomer. The difference between groups was significant. Conclusion: Bulk fill hybrid glass ionomer was significantly better than Light cure GIC and silver reinforced  glass ionomer  GIC in terms of shear bond strength.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jehan AlHumaid, Fahad, AlHarbi, Maha ElTantawi & Abeer ElembabyX-raymicrotomography assessment of Carisolv and Papacarie effect on dentinmineral density and amount of removedtissue, Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, .(2018).76(4), 236-240

Al-Halabi M., Salami A., Alnuaimi E., Kowash M., Hussein I. Assessment of paediatric dental guidelines and caries management alternatives in the post COVID-19 period. A critical review and clinical recommendations. Eur. Arch. Paediatr. Dent 2020 Oct;21(5):543–556. - PMC - PubMed

Hamama, H., Yiu, C., Burrow, M.. Current update of chemomechanical caries removalmethods.AustralianDentalJournal 2014,59(4),446-56.

Somani R, Jaidka S, Singh DJ, Sibal GK. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Various Glass Ionomer Cements to Dentin of Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016 Jul-Sep;9(3):192-196.

Ferrer M D, López-López A, Nicolescu T et al. Topic Application of the Probiotic Streptococcus dentisani Improves Clinical and Microbiological Parameters Associated With Oral Health. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2020 Aug; 10: 465-465.

Ajami A.A., Bahari M., Hassanpour-Kashani A., Abed-Kahnamoui M., Savadi-Oskoee A., Azadi-Oskoee F. Shear bond strengths of composite resin and giomer to mineral trioxide aggregate at different time intervals. Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry. 2017;9(7):e906–e911

Pravin Maru V, Shakuntala BS, Dharma N. Evaluation of Marginal Leakage and Shear Bond Strength of Bonded Restorations in Primary Teeth after Caries Removal by Conventional and Chemomechanical Techniques. Int Sch Res Notices. 2014 Aug 7;2014:

Malul M, and Zilberman U. The Effect of Heat Application on Microhardness of Glass Ionomer Cement and on Pulp Temperature-What to Use in the Clinic. Oral health case Rep. 2016;2(105):2.

Alturki M, Koller G, Almhöjd U, Banerjee A. Chemo-mechanical characterization of carious dentine using Raman microscopy and Knoop microhardness. R Soc Open Sci. 2020 May 20;7(5):200404. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200404. PMID: 32537229; PMCID: PMC7277260.

Evaluation of the efficacy of caries removal using polymer bur, stainless steel bur, carisolv, papacarie - An in vitro comparative study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9:ZC42–6

Jawa D., Singh S., Somani R., Jaidka S., Sirkar K., Jaidka R. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal agent (Papacarie) and conventional method of caries removal: an in vitro study. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2010;28(2):73–77.

Xie Z, Swain MV, Hoffman MJ. Structural integrity of enamel: experimental and modeling. J Dent Res 2009: 88: 529–533

Kidd E. A., Joyston-Bechal S., Beighton D. The use of a caries detector dye during cavity preparation: a microbiological assessment. British Dental Journal. 1993;174(7):245–248. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4808142.. -

Shashirekha G, Jena A, Mohanty N, Kamilla SK. Novel bioactive caries-detecting dye solution: Cytotoxicity, antimicrobial activity, scanning electron microscope, and stereomicroscopic analysis in diagnosis of dental caries. J Conserv Dent. 2020 Jan-Feb;23(1):79-85. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_154_20.

Murthy SS, Murthy GS. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Three Commercially Available Glass Ionomer Cements in Primary Teeth. Journal of international oral health: JIOH. 2015 Aug;7(8):103.

Croll TP, Nicholson JW. Glass ionomer cements in pediatric dentistry: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24(5):423–9.

Mazumdar P, Das A, Guha C. Comparative evaluation of hardness of different restorative materials (restorative gic, cention N, nanohybrid composite resin and silver amalgam) – An in vitro study. Int J Adv Res. 2018;6:82632.

Knight GM. The Benefits and Limitations of Glass-Ionomer Cements and Their Use in Contemporary Dentistry. InGlass-Ionomers in Dentistry 2016.57-79). Springer International Publishing

Bortoletto CC, Junior M, Gomes W, Motta LJ, Bussadori SK. Influence of acid etching on shear strength of different glass ionomer cements. Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences. 2013 Mar;12(1):11-5

Sabah A Ismail; Shaymaa SH Hassan; Bond Strength of Chemical and Light Cured Glass Ionomer Cements Bonded to Resin Composite. Volume 12, Issue 2, December 2012, Page 281-288.

Published

25-08-2021

How to Cite

Araby, S. M. E., Moteea, M. E. S., Abbas, A. N., Eissa, A. A., Abokhlifa, Y. H., Elmansy, T. A., Refaei, M. A. A., Elsayed, H. M., Elmanakhly, A. R., & El-ghany, A. A. A. (2021). Chemicomechanical caries removal in primary molars: Evaluation of shear bond strength of modified glass ionomer restorations: An in vitro study. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(S2), 1335–1346. Retrieved from https://sciencescholar.us/journal/index.php/ijhs/article/view/14676

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)