Effect of two desensitizing agents on post-operative hypersensitivity of composite resin restorations
Keywords:
desensitizing agents, Gluma, post-operative pain, hypersensitivityAbstract
Post-operative hypersensitivity still occurs although the improvements in adhesive systems and their techniques, so the current study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of two desensitizing systems. Materials and methods: A total No. of 48 patients were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=16); Gluma group, SAD group, and control group. Class I cavity preparation and self-etch bonding technique was used by Universal bonding system in the control group, before that desensitizing agent was applied in the two desensitizing tested groups, light cured and composite placement incrementally (Tetric N-ceram) and light cured, finishing, and polishing of composite restorations, then VAS system was used to record post-operative hypersensitivity by patients, and after 1 day,1 week and 1 month the data collected and statistically analyzed. Results: Total number of patients who suffered from post-operative hypersensitivity was 15 patients (31.25 %) after one day of treatment, the total number decreased to 9 patients (18.75 %) after one week postoperatively, and after one month the total number decreased again to 4 patients (8.33 %). In all the tested groups 1 day gave a significant difference than one week ( P= 0.011*),,,
Downloads
References
Bhatti UA: The phenomenon of postoperative sensitivity and composite restorations-a review. JPDA. 2019, 28:34. 10.25301/JPDA.281.33
Sancakli HS, Yildiz E, Bayrak I, Ozel S: Effect of different adhesive strategies on the post-operative sensitivity of class I composite restorations. Eur J Dent. 2014, 8:15-22. 10.4103/1305-7456.126234
Ali M, Hussain S, Abdullah F, Baloch J, Soomro ZA, Sheikh A, Khan S: A comparison of post-operative sensitivity in composite resin restorations using total-etch and self-etch adhesive in posterior teeth. J Adv Med Med Res. 2020, 28:1-6. 10.9734/jammr/2020/v32i2330710
Perdigão J, Swift EJ Jr: Critical appraisal: post-op sensitivity with direct composite restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013, 25:284-8. 10.1111/jerd.12045
Swift EJ Jr, Lloyd AH, Felton DA: The effect of resin desensitizing agents on crown retention. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997, 128:195-200. 10.14219/jada.archive.1997.0164
Survashe M, Parekh M: Immediate post-operative sensitivity after composite resin restoration-a review of treatment protocol. Int J Dent Oral Heal. 2016, 2:16-23. 10.25141/2471-657X-2016-2.0046
Jayashankara CM, Imroze R, Jyothi KN: A comparative evaluation of vivasens and system desensitizers on shear bond strength of composite resin to human dentin: an in vitro study. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2018, 17:73. 10.9790/0853-1704167377
Akca T, Yazici AR, Celik C, Ozgünaltay G, Dayangaç B: The effect of desensitizing treatments on the bond strength of resin composite to dentin mediated by a self-etching primer. Oper Dent. 2007, 32:451-6. 10.2341/06-130
Deliperi S, Bardwell DN: An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002, 133:1387-98. 10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0055
Auschill TM, Koch CA, Wolkewitz M, Hellwig E, Arweiler NB: Occurrence and causing stimuli of postoperative sensitivity in composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2009, 34:3-10. 10.2341/08-7
Dijkman GE, Jongebloed WL, de Vries J, Ogaard B, Arends J: Closing of dentinal tubules by glutardialdehyde treatment, a scanning electron microscopy study. Scand J Dent Res. 1994, 102:144-50. 10.1111/j.1600- 0722.1994.tb01170.x
Patil SA, Naik BD, Suma R: Evaluation of three different agents for in-office treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity: a controlled clinical study. Indian J Dent Res. 2015, 26:38-42. 10.4103/0970-9290.156796
Sobral MA, Garone-Netto N, Luz MA, Santos AP: Prevention of postoperative tooth sensitivity: a preliminary clinical trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2005, 32:661-8. 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01479.x
Opdam NJM, Roetrs FJM, Feizer AJ, Verdonschot EH: Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class II resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent. 1997, 26:562. 10.1016/s0300-5712(97)00042-0
Costa CA, Vaerten MA, Edwards C, Hanks CT: Cytotoxic effects of current dental adhesive systems on immortalized odontoblast cell line MDPC-23. Dent Mater. 1999, 1:434-41. 10.1016/s0109-5641(99)00071-8
Hanks CT, Strawn SE, Wataha JC, Craig RG: Cytotoxic effects of resin components on cultured mammalian fibroblasts. J Dent Res. 1991, 70:1450-5. 10.1177/00220345910700111201
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2021 International journal of health sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
