The effect of natural bioactive additives on the mechanical properties and optical and surface properties of conventional glass ionomer cement

Ahmed Bastawy; Ahmed Ali Goda; Ahmed Ramadan Elmanakhly; Hosam Muhammed Elsayed; Karim Sherif Adly Dewedar; Galal Eldeen Mosaad Sadek; Mahmoud Abd-Allah Mohammed Mekkey

doi:10.53730/ijhs.v6nS10.14039

Authors

Ahmed Bastawy Lecturer of Pediatric dentistry and dental public health department, faculty of oral and dental medicine, South valley university, Qena, Egypt
Ahmed Ali Goda Lecturer, Department of operative dentistry Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assuit, Egypt
Ahmed Ramadan Elmanakhly Lecturer of Operative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Al–Azhar University (boys-Cairo), Egypt
Hosam Muhammed Elsayed Lecturer of dental biomaterial department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Al–Azhar University (boys- Assiut branch), Egypt
Karim Sherif Adly Dewedar Lecturer of Crown and Bridge Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Al–Azhar University (boys-Cairo), Egypt
Galal Eldeen Mosaad Sadek Lecturer in Dental biomaterials department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Al–Azhar University (boys- Cairo), Egypt
Mahmoud Abd-Allah Mohammed Mekkey Lecturer, Fixed prosthodontics Department Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine South Valley University

Keywords:

conservative dentistry, mechanical properties, nano Hydroxyapatites, Glass Ionomer Cements, Carum carvi, Thymol, Sesame oils

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the effect of natural bioactive additives on the optical, mechanical, and surface characteristics of standard GIC. Materials and methods: The study included four tested groups: nano-hydroxyapatite (n-HA), Carumcarvi L. (Caraway), (Thymus vulgaris L) Thymol, and (Sesamum Indicum L) Sesame oils, and one control. The following parameters were evaluated: Diametral tensile, shear, Compressive, bond strength, solubility, Surface Roughness, and Color Stability. Results: Mechanical characteristics decreased significantly (p ≤0.05) in all adjusted cements compositions. Solubility and sorption were increased significantly (p ≤0.05) in all amended cement formulations except HA, which showed a non-significant rise in Water Sorption% and Solubility. Color difference mean values are clinically inappropriate (E > 3.3). The mean for 1 and 3% sesame oil-modified cement was lower (3.86 1.44 and 4.11 1.70, respectively). Surface roughness showed a significant difference between groups. Conclusion: Natural bioactive additions added to traditional glass ionomer cement did not improve its mechanical, optical, or surface qualities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ercan E, Dülgergil CT, Soyman M, Dalli M, Yildirim I. A field-trial of two restorative materials used with atraumatic restorative treatment in rural Turkey: 24-month results. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009 Jul-Aug;17(4):307-14. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572009000400008.

Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, Cabello I, Toledano-Osorio M, Aguilera FS. In vitro mechanical stimulation facilitates stress dissipation and sealing ability at the conventional glass ionomer cement-dentin interface. J Dent. 2018 Jun;73:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.04.006.

Garcia-Contreras R, Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Contreras-Bulnes R, Sakagami H, Morales-Luckie RA, Nakajima H. Mechanical, antibacterial and bond strength properties of nano-titanium-enriched glass ionomer cement. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015 May-Jun;23(3):321-8. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720140496.

Kim YK, Yiu CK, Kim JR, Gu L, Kim SK, Weller RN, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Failure of a glass ionomer to remineralize apatite-depleted dentin. J Dent Res. 2010 Mar;89(3):230-5. doi: 10.1177/0022034509357172.

Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Seseogullari-Dirihan R, Feitosa VP, Cama G, Brauer DS, Sauro S. Effects of Composites Containing Bioactive Glasses on Demineralized Dentin. J Dent Res. 2017 Aug;96(9):999-1005. doi: 10.1177/0022034517709464.

Sauro S, Watson T, Moscardó AP, Luzi A, Feitosa VP, Banerjee A. The effect of dentine pre-treatment using bioglass and/or polyacrylic acid on the interfacial characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. J Dent. 2018 Jun;73:32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.03.014.

Elsaka SE, Hamouda IM, Swain MV. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles addition to a conventional glass-ionomer restorative: influence on physical and antibacterial properties. J Dent. 2011 Sep;39(9):589-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.05.006.

Coutinho E, Cardoso MV, De Munck J, Neves AA, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding effectiveness and interfacial characterization of a nano-filled resin-modified glass-ionomer. Dent Mater. 2009 Nov;25(11):1347-57. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.004.

Francois P, Fouquet V, Attal JP, Dursun E. Commercially Available Fluoride-Releasing Restorative Materials: A Review and a Proposal for Classification. Materials (Basel). 2020 May 18;13(10):2313. doi: 10.3390/ma13102313.

Fierascu RC. Incorporation of Nanomaterials in Glass Ionomer Cements-Recent Developments and Future Perspectives: A Narrative Review. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2022 Oct 29;12(21):3827. doi: 10.3390/nano12213827.

Neves AB, Lopes LIG, Bergstrom TG, da Silva ASS, Lopes RT, Neves AA. Porosity and pore size distribution in high-viscosity and conventional glass ionomer cements: a micro-computed tomography study. Restor Dent Endod. 2021 Oct 29;46(4):e57. doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e57.

Nicholson JW. Maturation processes in glass-ionomer dental cements. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2018 Jul 31;4(1):63-71. doi: 10.1080/23337931.2018.1497492.

Gavini S, Devalla S, Shankarappa P, Padmaja M, Tiriveedi R, Ramakrishna J. Effect of Fluoride Recharge on the Microleakage of Fluoride-Releasing Restorative Materials: An Ex Vivo Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022 Apr 8;12(2):216-225. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_283_21.

Facio RC, Jeira-junior WF, BASTING RT, URSSI CP, MARAL FB, FRANÇA FL. Influence of fluoride-releasing materials in the inhibition of enamel and dentin demineralization around restorations Braz Dent Sci 2022 Oct/Dec;25 (4): e3505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4322/bds.2022.e3505

De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P. Four-year water degradation of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive bonded to dentin. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004 Feb;112(1):73-83. doi: 10.1111/j.0909-8836.2004.00089.x.

Najeeb S, Khurshid Z, Zafar MS, Khan AS, Zohaib S, Martí JM, Sauro S, Matinlinna JP, Rehman IU. Modifications in Glass Ionomer Cements: Nano-Sized Fillers and Bioactive Nanoceramics. Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Jul 14;17(7):1134. doi: 10.3390/ijms17071134.

Hafshejani TM, Zamanian A, Venugopal JR, Rezvani Z, Sefat F, Saeb MR, Vahabi H, Zarrintaj P, Mozafari M. Antibacterial glass-ionomer cement restorative materials: A critical review on the current status of extended release formulations. J Control Release. 2017 Sep 28;262:317-328. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.07.041.

Hoshika S, De Munck J, Sano H, Sidhu SK, Van Meerbeek B. Effect of Conditioning and Aging on the Bond Strength and Interfacial Morphology of Glass-ionomer Cement Bonded to Dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2015 Apr;17(2):141-6. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a33994.

Gu YW, Yap AU, Cheang P, Khor KA. Effects of incorporation of HA/ZrO(2) into glass ionomer cement (GIC). Biomaterials. 2005;26(7):713-20. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.03.019.

Barandehfard F, Kianpour Rad M, Hosseinnia A, Khoshroo K,Tahriri M, Jazayeri HE, et al. The addition of synthesizedhydroxyapatite and fluorapatite nanoparticles to aglass-ionomer cement for dental restoration and its effectson mechanical properties. Ceram Int2016;42(15):17866–21775.

Sharafeddin F, Alavi AA, Siabani S, Safari M. Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Three Types of Glass Ionomer Cements Containing Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles to Deep and Superficial Dentin. J Dent (Shiraz). 2020 Jun;21(2):132-140. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.77762.0.

Deng F, Sakai H, Kitagawa H, Kohno T, Thongthai P, Liu Y, Kitagawa R, Abe GL, Sasaki JI, Imazato S. Fabrication of pH-Responsive Zn2+-Releasing Glass Particles for Smart Antibacterial Restoratives. Molecules. 2022 Oct 24;27(21):7202. doi: 10.3390/molecules27217202. PMID: 36364029; PMCID: PMC9656087.

Paiva L, Fidalgo TKS, da Costa LP, Maia LC, Balan L, Anselme K, Ploux L, Thiré RMSM. Antibacterial properties and compressive strength of new one-step preparation silver nanoparticles in glass ionomer cements (NanoAg-GIC). J Dent. 2018 Feb;69:102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.12.003.

Sharafeddin F, Moraveji P. Comparison the Effect of Bromelain Enzyme, Phosphoric Acid, and Polyacrylic Acid Treatment on Microleakage of Composite and Glass Ionomer Restorations. J Dent (Shiraz). 2022 Jun;23(1 Suppl):175-182. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2021.88737.1355.

Zanata RL, Magalhães AC, Lauris JR, Atta MT, Wang L, Navarro MF. Microhardness and chemical analysis of high-viscous glass-ionomer cement after 10 years of clinical service as ART restorations. J Dent. 2011 Dec;39(12):834-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.09.003.

Bali P, Prabhakar AR, Basappa N. An Invitro Comparative Evaluation of Compressive Strength and Antibacterial Activity of Conventional GIC and Hydroxyapatite Reinforced GIC in Different Storage Media. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jul;9(7):ZC51-5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/13012.6205.

Aparajitha RV, Selvan PS, Ahamed AS, Bhavani S, Nagarajan V. Comparative evaluation of long-term fluoride release and antibacterial activity of an alkasite, nanoionomer, and glass ionomer restorative material - An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2021 Sep-Oct;24(5):485-490. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_336_21.

Al Qahtani WA, Sandeepa NC, Abdullah EK, Mousa YM, Ganem AA, Alqahtani EA, et al. A Clinical Study Comparing the Efficacy of Sesame Oil with Desensitizing Tooth Paste in Reducing Dentinal Hypersensitivity: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Dent. 2020 Oct 9;2020:6410102. doi: 10.1155/2020/6410102.

Aref NS, Abdallah RM. Could Different Formulations of Grape Seed (Vitis vinifera) Influence the Physical Properties of Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement? Contemp Clin Dent. 2021;12(4):383-388. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_696_20.

Lucas ME, Arita K, Nishino M. Toughness, bonding and fluoride-release properties of hydroxyapatite-added glass ionomer cement. Biomaterials. 2003 Sep;24(21):3787-94. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00260-6.

Hassan RH, Mokhtar A, Zaghlol H. Evaluation of marginal fit and microleakage of monolithic zirconia crowns cemented by bio-active and glass ionomer cements: In vitro study. Braz Dent Sci 2020 Jan/Mar;23(1)20-30 doi: 10.14295/bds.2020.v23i1.1824

Panigrahi A, Sudeep S, Sharma S, Mohanty S. Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Recharge Ability of Conventional and Hydroxyapatite Modified Glass Ionomer Cement with Daily Low Fluoride Exposure- An Invitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Feb;10(2):ZC53-5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17685.7236.

Debnath A, Kesavappa SB, Singh GP, Eshwar S, Jain V, Swamy M, Shetty P. Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial and Adhesive Properties of Chitosan Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement: an In vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(3):75-78. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25927.9593.

Martins RA, Marti LM, Mendes ACB, Fragelli C, Cilense M, Zuanon ACC. Brushing Effect on the Properties of Glass Ionomer Cement Modified by Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles or by Bioactive Glasses. Int J Dent. 2022 Feb 21;2022:1641041. doi: 10.1155/2022/1641041.

De Caluwé T, Vercruysse CW, Ladik I, Convents R, Declercq H, Martens LC, Verbeeck RM. Addition of bioactive glass to glass ionomer cements: Effect on the physico-chemical properties and biocompatibility. Dent Mater. 2017 Apr;33(4):186-203. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.01.007.

Arita K, Yamamoto A, Shinonaga Y, Harada K, Abe Y, Nakagawa K, Sugiyama S. Hydroxyapatite particle characteristics influence the enhancement of the mechanical and chemical properties of conventional restorative glass ionomer cement. Dent Mater J. 2011;30(5):672-83. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2011-029.

Elgendy M, Mosleh I. Zaghlol H. Micro-shear bond strength of bioactive cement to translucent zirconia after thermocycyling: a comparative in-vitro study Braz Dent Sci 2020 Jan/Mar;23(1) doi: 10.14295/bds.2020.v23i1.1830

Sharafeddin F, Jowkar Z, Bahrani S. Comparison between the effect of adding microhydroxyapatite and chitosan on surface roughness and Microhardness of resin modified and conventional glass ionomer cements. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 Aug 1;13(8):737-744. doi: 10.4317/jced.55996.

Noori AJ, Kareem FA. The effect of magnesium oxide nanoparticles on the antibacterial and antibiofilm properties of glass-ionomer cement. Heliyon. 2019;5(10):02568. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02568.

Savas S, Colgecen O, Yasa B, Kucukyilmaz E. Color stability, roughness, and water sorption/solubility of glass ionomer-Based restorative materials. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019 Jun;22(6):824-832. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_592_18.

Singer L, Bierbaum G, Kehl K, Bourauel C. Evaluation of the Flexural Strength, Water Sorption, and Solubility of a Glass Ionomer Dental Cement Modified Using Phytomedicine. Materials (Basel). 2020 Nov 25;13(23):5352. doi: 10.3390/ma13235352.

Keerthana B, Ganesh SB, Jayalakshmi S. Evaluation of flexural strength of glass ionomer cement after immersion in fruit juices. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2022 Nov;13(Suppl 1):S156-S159. doi: 10.4103/japtr.japtr_269_22.

Malhotra S, Bhullar KK, Kaur S, Malhotra M, Kaur R, Handa A. Comparative Evaluation of Compressive Strength and Flexural Strength of GC Gold Hybrid, GIC Conventional and Resin-modified Glass-ionomer Cement. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022 Jul;14(Suppl 1):S214-S216. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_134_22.

Nejatifard M, Panahandeh N, Ghasemi A, Torabzadeh H.Effect of delayed light-curing on solubility, color stability, and opacity of Fuji II LC glass ionomer cement: Original Article Braz Dent Sci 2022 Apr/Jun;25 (2): e2467 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4322/bds.2022.e2467

Dionysopoulos D, Tolidis K, Tortopidis D, Gerasimou P, Sfeikos T. Effect of a calcium chloride solution treatment on physical and mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements. Odontology. 2018 Oct;106(4):429-438. doi: 10.1007/s10266-018-0338-5.

Hamouda IM. Effects of various beverages on hardness, roughness, and solubility of esthetic restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011 Oct;23(5):315-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00453.

Patel A, Belsare SP, Jajoo SS, Patil S, Kunte S, Chaudhary S. Comparison of the Influence of a Packaged Fruit Juice on the Bacterial Adhesion on a Glass Ionomer Cement and an Esthetic Restorative Material In Vitro. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 May-Jun;15(3):327-331. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2394.

Tiwari S, Nandlal B. Invitro Evaluation of Fluoride Release from Hydroxyapatite Reinforced Glass Ionomer with or without Protective Coating. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Apr;10(4):ZC73-5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/12598.7668.

Dias GF, Alves F, Samway, Santos F. Mineral exchange between dentin pre-tretament with Dolomite powder on demineralized dentin in deciduous molars Braz Dent Sci 2018 Jul/Sep;21(3) doi: 10.14295/bds.2018.v21i3.1592.

Mittal S., Soni H., Sharma D., Mittal K., Pathania V., Sharma S. Comparative evaluation of the antibacterial and physical properties of conventional glass ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine and antibiotics. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry. 2015;5(4):268–275. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.161754.

Zandi Karimi A, Rezabeigi E, Drew RAL. Aluminum-free glass ionomer cements containing 45S5 Bioglass® and its bioglass-ceramic. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2021 Jun 22;32(7):76. doi: 10.1007/s10856-021-06553-3.