Evaluation the immediate and delayed micro-leakage of three restorative materials to fill class II cavities in molar teeth

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5nS2.8599

Authors

  • Ahmed Tharwat Al Ammary Assistant Professor of Operative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine Al-Azhar University (Assiut), Assiut Branch, Egypt
  • Mahmoud El-Said Ahmed Abd El-Aziz Lecturer of Dental Biomaterials, Faculty of Dental Medicine (Assiut), Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt
  • Alaa. N. Syam Assistant professor of Dental Biomaterial, Faculty of Dental Medicine Al-Azhar University (Assiut), Assiut Branch, Egypt
  • Mahmoud Abdellah Ahmed Refaei Lecturer of Dental Biomaterials, Faculty of Dental Medicine Al-Azhar University (Assiut), Assiut Branch, Egypt
  • Ahmed Ali Assistant professor of Dental Biomaterial, Faculty of Dental Medicine Al-Azhar University (Assiut), Assiut Branch, Egypt

Keywords:

micro-leakage, fill class II cavities, molar teeth

Abstract

Aim: The current research aimed to evaluate the Immediate and Delayed micro-leakage of three restorative materials (Group I: Activa™ BioActive, Group II: Tetric N Ceram Bulk fill, and Group III: Ever X Posterior) in Class II cavities. Method:  30 human permanent lower molars were selected to be utilized in the current research. Class II cavities in the mesial surface were prepared. After that, the molars were randomly split into the three main investigational groups according to the type of composite restoration (n=10) teeth for each group. Next, two subgroups (n=5) were created from every main group; subgroup 1 immediate leakage test (without storage) and the molars specimens within subgroup 2 delayed leakage test (were kept in normal saline for 28 days within the incubator at 37 °C ± 1°C and relative humidity 95%.): Group I: Activa™ BioActive, Group II: Tetric N Ceram Bulk fill, and Group III: Ever X Posterior. Every tooth specimen was subjected to 1000 heat cycles with a dwell time of 30 seconds among 5° and 55°C. Then, the specimens were immersed in a 1% aqueous solution of methylene blue dye for 8 hours. Three millimeters below the cement-enamel interface, the roots of the teeth were cut. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Park KJ, Pfeffer M, Nake T, Schneider H, Ziebolz D, Haak R. Evaluation of low-viscosity bulk-fill composites regarding marginal and internal adaptation. Odont. 2021;109(1):139-48.

Ferracane JL, Lawson NC. Probing the hierarchy of evidence to identify the best strategy for placing class II dental composite restorations using current materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33(1):39-50.

Goldstein RE, Lamba S, Lawson NC, Beck P, Oster RA, Burgess JO, et al. Microleakage around Class V composite restorations after ultrasonic scaling and sonic toothbrushing around their margin. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017; 29:41‑8.

Gupta A, Tavane P, Gupta PK, Tejolatha B, Lakhani AA, Tiwari R, et al. Evaluation of microleakage with total etch, self-etch and universal adhesive systems in Class V restorations: An in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:ZC53‑6.

Hashemikamangar SS, Pourhashemi SJ, Nekooimehr Z, Dehaki MG, Kharazifard MJ. Effect of lactic acid on microleakage of Class V low‑shrinkage composite restorations. J Dent (Tehran) 2016; 13:223‑30.

Al‑Agha EI, Alagha MI. Nano leakage of Class V resin restorations using two nano-filled adhesive systems. J Int Oral Health 2015; 7:6‑11.

Yang H, Guo J, Guo J, Chen H, Somar M, Yue J, et al. Nano leakage evaluation at adhesive‑dentin interfaces by different observation methods. Dent Mater J 2015; 34:654‑62.

Mirzakhani M, Mousavinasab SM, Atai M. The effect of acrylate‑based dental adhesive solvent content on microleakage in composite restorations. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2016; 13:515‑20.

Maas, M.S.; Alania, Y.; Natale, L.C.; Rodrigues, M.C.; Watts, D.C.; Braga, R.R. Trends in Restorative Composites Research: What Is in the Future? Braz. Oral Res. 2017;31: 23–36.

Zhang K., Zhang N., Weir M.D., Reynolds M.A., Bai Y., Xu H.H.K. Bioactive Dental Composites and Bonding Agents Having Remineralizing and Antibacterial Characteristics. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 2017, 61, 669–687.

Ozturk F, Ersoz M, Ozturk SA, Hatunoglu E, Malkoc S. Micro‑CT evaluation of microleakage under orthodontic ceramic brackets bonded with different bonding techniques and adhesives. Eur J Orthod 2016; 38:163‑9.

ISO/ TS 11405: Dentistry_ Testing of adhesion to tooth structure. 3rd ed. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2015.

Turkistani A, Nasir A, Merdad Y, Jamleh A, Alshouibi E, Sadr A, et al. Evaluation of microleakage in class-II bulk-fill composite restorations. J Dent Sci. 2020;15(4):486-92.

Zavattini A, Mancini M, Higginson J, Foschi F, Pasquantonio G, Mangani F. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of microleakage of Class II composite restorations: An in vitro study. Europ J Dent. 2018;12(3):369-74.

Benett AR, Michou S, Larsen L, Peutzfeldt A, Pallesen U, van Dijken JWV. Adhesion and marginal adaptation of a claimed bioactive, restorative material. Biomater Invest Dent. 2019;6(1):90-8.

Garcia L, Gil AC, Puy CL. In vitro evaluation of microleakage in Class II composite restorations: High-viscosity bulk-fill vs conventional composites. Dent Mat J. 2019;38(5):721-7.

Kachalia PR. Composite resins 2.0: entering a new age of posterior composites. Dent Today. 2013;32(12):78, 80-81.

Kalmowicz J, Phebus JG, Owens BM, Johnson WW, King GT. Microleakage of Class I and II composite resin restorations using a sonic-resin placement system. Oper Dent. 2015;40(6):653-661.

Papadogiannis D, Tolidis KN, Gerasimoub P, Lakesc R, Papadogiannis Y. Viscoelastic properties, creep behavior and degree of conversion of bulk fill composite resins. Dent Mater. 2015; 22:1-9.

Nirmala Bishnoi, Ida de Noronha de Ataide, Marina Fernandes, Rajan Lambor and Bobbin Sandhu. Evaluating the marginal seal of a bioactive restorative material activa Bioactive and two bulk fill composites in class II restorations: an in vitro study. Int. J. Appl. Dent. Sci. 2020;6(3):98-102.

Fronza BM, Rueggeberg FA, Braga RR, Mogilevych B, Soares LES, Martin AA, et al. Monomer conversion, microhardness, internal marginal adaptation, and shrinkage stress of bulk-fill resin composites. Dent Mater. 2015; 31:1542-51.

Jumaah SS, Al-Shamma AM. Immediate and Long Term Gingival Marginal Leakage of Two Bioactive Bulk Fill Restorative Materials (A Comparative in vitro Study). J Res Med Dent Sci. 2021;9(7):120-6.

McCabe J, Yan Z, Al-Naimi O. Smart materials in dentistry. Aust Dent J. 2011;56(1):3-10.

Hamdy TM. Bioactivity: A New Buzz in Dental Materials. ECDE. 2018; 17:1-6.

Published

25-11-2021

How to Cite

Al Ammary, A. T., El-Aziz, M. E.-S. A. A., Syam, A. N., Refaei, M. A. A., & Ali, A. (2021). Evaluation the immediate and delayed micro-leakage of three restorative materials to fill class II cavities in molar teeth. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(S2), 1545–1553. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5nS2.8599

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)