A study to assess the difficulties encountered while using PPE kits among medical professionals

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.5306

Authors

  • Vinod Sargaiyan Professor, Department of Oral pathology and Microbiology, Maharana Pratap College of Dentistry n Research Centre, Gwalior (M.P.)
  • Jayendra Arya MD, 3rd year resident, Department of Pediatrics, Shyam shah medical college, Rewa (M.P.)
  • Sakshi Jain MD, 3rd year resident, Department of anesthesiology, Shyam shah medical college, Rewa (M.P.)
  • Archana Misurya BDS, MDS, Associate professor, Department of dentistry, MLB medical college, Kanpur road, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh
  • Sandeep Kumar Swarnkar Reader, Department of Pedodontics, Maharana pratap college of dentistry & research centre, Gwalior (M.P.)
  • Diksha Yadav Masters in Dental surgery, 3rd yr. Postgraduate student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Maharana Pratap college of Dentistry & research center, Gwalior (M.P.)

Keywords:

COVID-19, sars-cov2, novel coronavirus, PPE, personal protective equipment, difficulties, challenges

Abstract

The personal protective equipment (PPE) undoubtedly provides a shield of protection for the healthcare workers (HCWs) fighting the disease as a valuable asset to the nation. However, there have been various problems associated with the PPE, ranging from its shortage to problems arising from heat, dehydration, etc while wearing them. There is a need to assess these problems faced by HCWs both qualitatively and quantitatively for their timely and effective redressal. An electronic questionnaire survey was conducted among a cohort of HCWs who had performed COVID-19 duties and used PPE kits in Madhya Pradesh. The cohort consisted of different categories of doctors, nursing personnel, and other paramedical staff. Results; The most common problems associated with using PPE kits was excessive sweating (100%), fogging of goggles, spectacles, or face shields (79 %), suffocation (61%), breathlessness (49 %), fatigue (82 %), headache due to prolonged use (34 %), and pressure marks on the skin at one or more areas on repeated use (56 %). Occasional problems reported were skin allergy/dermatitis caused by the synthetic material of the PPE kit, face shield impinging onto the neck during intubation, and nasal pain, pain at the root of the pinna, and slipperiness of shoe covers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

World Health Organisation: coronavirus disease dashboard. [Dec;2021 ];https://covid19.who.int/table 2021

Personal protective equipment (PPE) guidelines, adaptations and lessons during the COVID-19 pandemic. Woolley K, Smith R, Arumugam S. Ethics Med Public Health. 2020;14:100546.

Healthworld. 87k health staff infected with Covid, 573 dead; 74% cases from six states. [Dec;2021];https://health.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/industry/87k-health-staff-infected-with-covid-573-dead-74-cases-from-six-states/77814807 2021

Wikipedia: personal protective equipment. [Dec 2021;2020 ];https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Personal_protective_equipment&oldid=971886294 Dec;2021

Covid-19: appropriate PPE prevents infections in doctors in frontline roles, study shows. Torjesen I. BMJ. 2021;369:0.

Strategies for rational use of personal protective equipment (PPE) among healthcare providers during the COVID-19 crisis. Mahmood SU, Crimbly F, Khan S, Choudry E, Mehwish S. Cureus. 2021;12:0.

Google Trends; explore search term PPE. [Dec;2021 ];https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=ppe 2021

Problems arising from PPE when worn for long periods. Vidua RK, Chouksey VK, Bhargava DC, Kumar J. Med Leg J. 2021;88:47–49.

Infographic. Cooling strategies to attenuate PPE-induced heat strain during the COVID-19 pandemic (Epub ahead of print) Bongers CC, de Korte JQ, Catoire M, Greefhorst J, Hopman MTE, Kingma B, Eijsvogels TMH. Br J Sports Med. 2020;10

Limiting factors for wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) in a health care environment evaluated in a randomised study. Loibner M, Hagauer S, Schwantzer G, Berghold A, Zatloukal K. PLoS One. 2019;14:0.

cases rise in Russia as health workers pay the price for PPE shortage. Dyer O. BMJ. 2020;369:0.

Challenges and solutions for addressing critical shortage of supply chain for personal and protective equipment (PPE) arising from Coronavirus disease (COVID19) pandemic - case study from the Republic of Ireland. Rowan NJ, Laffey JG. Sci Total Environ. 2020;725:138532.

Availability of personal protective equipment (PPE) among US and Pakistani doctors in COVID-19 pandemic. Ahmed J, Malik F, Bin Arif T, et al. Cureus. 2020;12:0.

PPE guidance for covid-19: be honest about resource shortages. O'Sullivan ED. BMJ. 2020;369:0.

Human rights protections are needed alongside PPE for health-care workers responding to COVID-19. Amon JJ. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8:0.

Personal protective equipment and intensive care unit healthcare worker safety in the COVID-19 era (PPE-SAFE): an international survey. Tabah A, Ramanan M, Laupland KB, et al. J Crit Care. 2020;59:70–75.

Personal protective equipment (PPE) for surgeons during COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review of availability, usage, and rationing (Epub ahead of print) Jessop ZM, Dobbs TD, Ali SR, et al. Br J Surg. 2020;10.

Commentary on: a novel solution to the PPE crisis during the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) Syed DS, Malik MS, Ominu-Evbota K. Int J Surg. 2020;79:192–193.

Review of sterilization techniques for medical and personal protective equipment contaminated with SARS-CoV-2. Jinia AJ, Sunbul NB, Meert CA, et al. IEEE Access. 2020;PP:1.

Beyond the PPE shortage: improperly fitting personal protective equipment and COVID-19 transmission among health care professionals (Epub ahead of print) Ming X, Ray C, Bandari M. Hosp Pract (1995) 2020.

Cognitive load and performance of health care professionals in donning and doffing PPE before and after a simulation-based educational intervention and its implications during the COVID-19 pandemic for biosafety. Díaz-Guio DA, Ricardo-Zapata A, Ospina-Velez J, Gómez-Candamil G, Mora-Martinez S, Rodriguez-Morales AJ. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32532947/ Infez Med. 2020;28:111–117.

Personal protective equipment (PPE) and its use in COVID-19: important facts (Epub ahead of print) Das S, Rajalingham S. Indian J Surg. 2020

Human factor considerations in using personal protective equipment in the COVID-19 pandemic context: binational survey study. Parush A, Wacht O, Gomes R, Frenkel A. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:0.

Therapeutic approach to skin reactions caused by personal protective equipment (PPE) during COVID-19 pandemic: an experience from a tertiary hospital in Granada, Spain (Epub ahead of print) Navarro-Triviño FJ, Ruiz-Villaverde R. Dermatol Ther. 2020:0.

Impact of personal protective equipment on surgical performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Yánez Benítez C, Güemes A, Aranda J, et al. World J Surg. 2020;44:2842–2847.

COVID-19 pandemic: the 3R's (reduce, refine, and replace) of personal protective equipment (PPE) sustainability. Ip V, Özelsel TJP, Sondekoppam RV, Tsui BCH. Can J Anaesth. 2020;67:1070–1071.

Child-friendly PPE. Naga Sailaja DSV. Br Dent J. 2020;228:901–902.

Published

30-03-2022

How to Cite

Sargaiyan, V., Arya, J., Jain, S., Misurya, A., Swarnkar, S. K., & Yadav, D. (2022). A study to assess the difficulties encountered while using PPE kits among medical professionals. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S2), 1752–1758. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.5306

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)