Clinical evaluation of direct resin composite restorations of endodontically treated molars using dual cured self-adhesive system with bulk fill composite versus incremental packing technique: Randomized control trial

Ahmed Refaat Mohamed; Mohamed Mahmoud Abd Elmohsen; Mohsen Hussien Abi-Elhassan; Mohamed Fouad Haridy; Rasha Raafat

doi:10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.5468

Authors

Ahmed Refaat Mohamed
ahmed.refaat@dentistry.cu.edu.eg
Assisstant Lecturer of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
Mohamed Mahmoud Abd Elmohsen Professor of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
Mohsen Hussien Abi-Elhassan Professor of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
Mohamed Fouad Haridy Associate professor of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt & The British University in Egypt (BUE)
Rasha Raafat Associate professor of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

Keywords:

resin composite restorations, treated molars, bulk fill composite, packing technique

Abstract

Restoration after endodontic treatment is as important as root canal therapy for clinical success. Evolution of adhesive dentistry strongly aided in the conservation of tooth structure and reinforcement of the restored teeth. Self-etch adhesives has evolved aiming to reduce the technique sensitivity and simplifying the steps needed for bonding (one or two steps). Dual cured self-etch adhesives were also introduced to be more chemically compatible with the resin composite restorations. Bulk-fill resin composites has also achieved great popularity due to the ease of application and being more time saving. These materials made the direct restoration of endodontically treated teeth more conservative, time saving and reliable. This research was performed to assess the clinical success of the restorations of the endodontically treated molars with remaining three walls restored using self-etch adhesives and bulk fill resin composite in comparison to conventional nanohybrid resin composite at a time intervals of 1week (baseline) , 3 ,6 and 12 months. In a randomized clinical trial, 40 patients with endodontically treated molars with remaining three walls received a restorative intervention with either (Xtra-Fil) bulk fill resin composite or (Grandio) nano hybrid resin composite applied in incremental technique.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abouelleil H. Pradelle N. Villat C, Attik N. Colon P. Grosgogeat B (2015): Com-parison of mechanical properties of a new fiber reinforced composite and bulk filling composite. Restor Dent Endod 40(4):262-270.

Amaral RC, Stanislawczuk R, Zander-Grande C, Gagler D, ReisA & Loguercio AD(2010): Bondstrengthand quality of the hybrid layer of one-step self-etch adhesives applied with agitation on dentin .Operative Dentistry 35(2):211-219.

Bayne, S. C., & Schmalz, G. (2005): Reprinting the classic article on USPHS evaluation methods for measuring the clinical research performance of restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig, 9(4):209-214.

Benetti AR, Havndrup-Pedersen C, Honore D, Pedersen MK, & Pallesen U (2015): Bulk-fill resin composites: Polymerization contraction, depth of cure, and gap formation Operative Dentistry 40(2):190-200

Beun S, Glorieux T, Devaux J, Vreven J, Leloup G (2017): Characterization of nano filled compared to universal and micro filled composites. Dent Mater 23(1):51-59.

Boaro LC, Goncalves F, Guimaraes TC, Ferracane JL, Versluis A, & Braga RR (2010): Polymerization stress, shrinkage and elastic modulus of current low-shrinkage stress restorative composites Dental Materials 26(12):1144-1150.

Celik, C., Arhun, N., & Yamanel, K (2010): Clinical evaluation of resin-based composites in posterior restorations: 12-month results. Eur J Dent, 4(1), 57-65.

Ciucchi B, Bouillaguet S, Holz J et al (1995): Dentinal fluid dynamics in human teeth in vitro. J Endod; 21: 191-194.

Colak H, Tokay U, Uzgur R, Hamidi MM, Ercan E(2017): A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of one nano-hybrid and one high-viscosity bulk-fill composite restorative systems in class II cavities: 12 months results. Niger J Clin Pract. 20(7):822-831.

Czasch P, Ilie N(2013): In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin. Oral investing.17(1):227-235.

De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, & Van Meerbeek B (2005): A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: Methods and results Journal of Dental Research 84(2) 118-132.

Driscoll CO, Dowker SEP, Anderson P, Wilson RM, Gulabivala K(2002): Effects of sodium hypochlorite solution on root dentine composition. J Mater Sci Mater Med 13(2): 219-223.

Eichenberger M, Biner N, Amato M, Lussi A, Perrin P (2018): Effect of Magnification on the Precision of Tooth Preparation in Dentistry. Oper Dent.43(5):501-507.

Endo T1, Finger WJ, Hoffmann M, Kanehira M, Komatsu M(2007): The role of oxygen inhibition of a self-etch adhesive on self-cure resin composite bonding. Am J Dent. Jun;20(3):157-160.

Eraslan O., Eskitascioglu G., Belli S (2011): Conservative restoration of severely damaged endodontically treated premolar teeth: a FEM study. Clinical Oral Investigations 15:403–408.

Frassetto A, Breschi L, Turco G, Marchesi G, Di Lenarda R, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Cadenaro M(2016): Mechanisms of degradation of the hybrid layer in adhesive dentistry and therapeutic agents to improve bond durability--A literature review. Dent Mater. 32(2):41-53.

Fronza BM, Rueggeberg FA, Braga RR, Mogilevych B, Soares LES, Martin AA, Ambrosano G, & Giannini M (2015): Monomer conversion, microhardness, internal marginal adaptation, and shrinkage stress of bulk-fill resin composites Dental Materials 31(12) 1542-1551.

Grigoratos D, Knowles J, Ng YL, Gulabivala K(2001): Effect of exposing dentine to sodium hypochlorite and calcium hydroxide on its flexural strength and elastic modulus Int Endod J 34(2): 113-119.

Gutierrez MF et al, 2017).

Gutiérrez MF, Sutil E, Malaquias P, de Paris Matos T, de Souza LM, Reis A, Perdigão J, Loguercio AD(2017): Effect of self-curing activators and curing protocols on adhesive properties of universal adhesives bonded to dual-cured composites.33(7):775-787.

Hannig, C., Westphal, C., Becker, K., Attin, T (2005: Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays. J. Prosthet. Dent. 94: 342–349.

Haralur SB, Al-Qahtani AS, Al-Qarni MM, Al-Homrany RM, Aboalkhair AE(2016) : Influence of remaining dentin wall thickness on the fracture strength of endodontically treated tooth. J Conserv Dent.19(1):63-7.

Heintze SD, Monreal D, Peschke A (2015) : Marginal Quality of Class II Composite Restorations Placed in Bulk Compared to an Incremental Technique: Evaluation with SEM and Stereomicroscope. - J Adhes Dent. 17(2):147-54.

Heintze SD (2013): Clinical relevance of tests on bond strength, microleakage and marginal adaptation Dental Materials 29(1) 59-84.

Hickel, R., Roulet, J. F., Bayne, S., Heintze, S. D., Mjör, I. A., Peters, M., Rousson, V., Randall, R., Schmalz, G., Tyas, M., & Vanherle, G. (2007) : Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig, 11(1): 5-33.

Huang TJ, Schilder H, Nathanson D(1992): Effects of moisture content and endodontic treatment on some mechanical properties of human dentin. J Endod 18(5):209-215.

Jindal S, Jindal R, Mahajan S, Dua R, Jain N, Sharma S (2012): In vitro evaluation of the effect of post system and length on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated human anterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig 16: 1627-1633.

Jokstad, A. (2016): Secondary caries and microleakage. Dental Materials, 32(1), 11-25.

Kampouropoulos D, Paximada C, Loukidis M, Kakaboura A (2010) : The influence of matrix type on the proximal contact in Class II resin composite restorations. Oper Dent. 35(4):454-62.

Kwon OH, Kim DH, Park SH (2010): The influence of elastic modulus of base material on the marginal adaptation of direct composite restoration. Oper Dent. 35(4):441–7.

Lempel E, Lovász BV, Bihari E, Krajczár K, Jeges S, Tóth Á, Szalma J(2019): Longterm clinical evaluation of direct resin composite restorations in vital vs. endodonticallytreated posterior teeth - Retrospective study up to 13 years. Dent Mater. 2019.2.

.Leprince JG1, Palin WM2, Vanacker J3, Sabbagh J4, Devaux J5, Leloup G6(2014) : Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 42(8):993-1000.

Magne P, Carvalho AO, Bruzi G, Anderson RE, Maia HP, Giannini M (2014): Influence of no-ferrule and no-post buildup design on the fatigue resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with resin nanoceramic CAD/CAM crowns. Oper Dent 39(6): 595-602.

Maleknejad F, Ameri H, Manafi S, Chasteen J, Ghavamnasiri M(2013):The effect of photoactivation time and light tip distance on the degree of conversion of light and dual-cured dentin adhesives. Indian J Dent Res.24(2):225-8.

McReynolds D, Duane B(2016): Insufficient evidence on whether to restore root-filled teeth with single crowns or routine fillings. Evid Based Dent.17(2):50-1.

Moraes, R. R., Cenci, M. S., & Schneider, L. F. J. (2018): Clinical Longevity of Direct Resin Composite Restorations. In Dental Composite Materials for Direct Restorations (pp. 269-288). Springer, Cham.

Nunes TG1, Erhardt MC, Toledano M, Osorio R (2009): One-step self-etching adhesive polymerization: influence of a self-curing activator. J Dent.37(8):616-21.

Olcay K, Ataoglu H, Belli S(2018): Evaluation of Related Factors in the Failure of EndodonticallyTreated Teeth: A Cross-sectional Study. J Endod.44(1):38-45.

Opdam, N. J. M., Van de Sande, F. H., Bronkhorst, E., Cenci, M. S., Bottenberg, P., Pallesen, U & Van Dijken, J. W. (2014). Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of dental research, 93(10), 943-949.

Pashley DH, Pashley EL, Carvalho RM, Tay FR (2002): The effects of dentin permeability on restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 46(2):211-245.

Pereira R, Bicalho AA, Franco SD, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, Soares CJ (2016): Effect of restorative protocol on cuspal strain and residual stress in endodontically treated molars. Oper Dent.41(1):23-33.

Ramírez-Sebastià A, Bortolotto T, Cattani-Lorente M, Giner L, Roig M, Krejci I (2014): Adhesive restoration of anterior endodontically treated teeth: influence of post length on fracture strength. Clin Oral Investig 18(2): 545-554.

Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH (1989): Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic restorative procedures J Endod 15(11): 512-516.

Rosen H. : Operative procedures on mutilated endodontically treated teeth. J Pros Den. 1961;(1).

Santiago SL, Passos VF, Vieira AH, Navarro MF, Lauris JR, & Franco EB (2010) :Two-year clinical evaluation of resinous restorative systems in non-carious cervical lesions Brazilian Dental Journal 21(3) 229-234.

Scotti N, Eruli C, Comba A, Paolino DS, Alovisi M, Pasqualini D, Berutti E(2015): Longevity of class 2 direct restorations in root-filled teeth: A retrospective clinical study. J Dent.43(5):499-505.

Sequeira-Byron P, Fedorowicz Z,Carter B, Nasser M, Alrowaili EF (2015):Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root-filled teeth (Review) Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 25;(9):109.

Soares CJ, Rodrigues MP, Oliveira LR, Braga SS, Barcelos LM, Silva GR et al (2017): An evaluation of the light output from 22 contemporary light curing units. Braz Dent J. 28(3):362-71.

Steele, A., Johnson, B.R., (1999): In vitro fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars. J. Endod.1999; 25: 6–8.

Suksaphar W1, Banomyong D2, Jirathanyanatt T1, Ngoenwiwatkul Y3(2018): Survival Rates from Fracture of Endodontically Treated Premolars Restored with Full-coverage Crowns or Direct Resin Composite Restorations: A Retrospective Study. J Endod.44(2):233-238.

Sunada N, Ishii R, Shiratsuchi K, Shimizu Y, Tsubota K, Kurokawa H, Miyazaki M (2013): Ultrasonic measurement of the effects of adhesive application and power density on the polymerization behavior of core build-up resins. Acta Odontol Scand 71(1) 37–43.

Suppa P, Ruggeri A Jr., Tay FR, Prati C, Biasotto M, Falconi M, Pashley DH, Breschi L(2006): Reduced Antigenicity of Type I Collagen and Proteoglycans in Sclerotic Dentin. J Dent Res 85(2):133-137.

Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Sai K, Tsujimoto A, Imai A, Erickson RL, Latta MA, & Miyazaki M (2018): Influence of different smear layers on bond durability of self-etch adhesives Dental Materials 34(2) 246-259.

Tang W, Wu Y, Smales RJ (2010): Identifying and Reducing Risks for Potential Fractures in Endodontically Treated Teeth. J Endod. 36(4):609-617.

Thomas, M., Sophie, D., Florence, C., Kerstin, G., Jean-Christophe, M., Pierre, M., Matthieu, P., Brigitte, G., Elisabeth, D. (2017) : The use of FDI criteria in clinical trials on direct dental restorations: A scoping review. J dent, 68,1-9.

Van Dijken, J.W (2000): Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up. J. Dent 28: 299–306.

Yıkılgan I, Bala O (2013): How can stress be controlled in endodontically treated teeth? A 3D finite element analysis. ScientificWorldJournal.

Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Hayakawa S, Nagaoka N, Irie M, Ogawa T, Van Landuyt KL, Osaka A, Suzuki K, Minagi S, & Van Meerbeek B (2011): Nanolayering of phosphoric acid ester monomer on enamel and dentin Acta Biomaterialia 7(8) 3187-3195.

Yousaf A, Aman N, Manzoor MA, Shah JADilrasheed (2017) : Postoperative sensitivity of self-etch versus total etch adhesive. J Dent Mater.33(7):775-787.

Zhang Y, & Wang Y (2013): Effect of application mode on interfacial morphology and chemistry between dentine and self-etch adhesives Journal of Dentistry 41(3) 231-240.

Ziad Salameh, Roberto Sorrentino, Federica Papacchini, Hani F. Ounsi, Esam Tashkandi, Cecilia Goracci, and Marco Ferrari (2006): Fracture Resistance and Failure Patterns of Endodontically Treated Mandibular Molars Restored Using Resin Composite With or Without Translucent Glass Fiber Posts J Endod.32(8):752-5.

Zukanović A1(2013): Caries risk assessment models in caries prediction. Acta Med Acad.42(2):198-208.