Arch form

A review

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5nS1.5666

Authors

  • Disha Singh PG Student 1st Year, Department of Orthodontics, Desh Bhagat Dental College & Hospital, Mandi Gobindgarh

Keywords:

arch form, bonwill, Hawley, catenary, brader

Abstract

Arch form is highly individualized .The universal ideal arch form is the most persistent but exclusive task for most of the orthodontic researchers have. The basic principle of arch form in orthodontic treatment is that within reason, the patient original arch form should be preserved. Dental arch width and form are important Factors for determining the success and stability of orthodontics treatment. Because of the complex problems, And relatively low knowledge of dental arches, as of today, there is no universally accepted ideal arch form. This article gives the review about different concept of arch form, importance arch form from conventional era to modern practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexander Sved. 1952. The application of Engineering Methods to Orthodontics. AJO-DO, 38(6):399-421

Allen C. Brader. 1972. Dental arch form related with intraoral forces: PR=C. AJODO, 71(6)541-61

Andreiko C. 1994. The elan and orthos systems. JCO, 28:459.

Arch form in orthodontics: A Review, Amit Tiwari et al, journal of applied dental and medical science, vol 4,march 2018

Andres De La Cruz R, Paul Sampson, et al. 1995. Long – term changes in arch form after orthodontic treatment and retention. A J Orthod Dentofac Orthop., 107:518-30

Angel Edward H. 1907. Treatment of malocclusion of teeth. Edition 7, S.S. White Co., Philadelphia.

Angle EH. 1899. Classification of malocclusion. Dental Cosmos, 41:264-84.

Anwar N. and Fida M. 2010. Variability of arch forms in various vertical facial patterns. J Coll Physicians Surg

Axel F. Lundström 1925. Malocclusion of the teeth regarded as a problem in connection with the apical base. Ajodo, 11(11): 1022-42.

Baluta J. and Lavelle C. 1987. An analysis of dental arch form. European Journal of Orthodontics, (9):165-171

Deckock W.H. 1972. Dental arch depth and width studies longitudinally from 12 years of age to adulthood. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop., 62(1)56-66

Efisio Defraia, et al. 2006. Dental arch dimensions in the mixed dentitions: a study of Italian children born in the 1950s and the 1990s. Angle Orthod., 76:446-51

Felton J. Mark, et al. 1987. A computerized analysis of the shape and stability of mandibular arch form. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop., 92:478-83

George C. Chuck. 1934. Ideal arch form. Angle Orthod., 312- 327

Hawley C. A. 1905. Determination of the normal arch, and its application to orthodontia. The Dental Cosmos, 47(5):541- 552

Interlandi S. 1998. New method for establishing arch form. JCO, 12:843-845

James H Scott. 1957. The shape of the dental arches. J Dent Res., 36:996-1003

Jan Henrikson, et al. 2001. Long term stability of dental arch form in normal occlusion from 13 to 31 years of age. European Journal of Orthodontics, 23:51-61

Knott VB. 1972. Longitudinal study of dental arch width at four stages of dentition. Angle Orthod., 42:387-95

Luca Lombardo, et al. 2010. A new concept of anatomy in lingual arch form. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop., 138: 260.e1-260.e13

Mclaughlin, et al. 2001. Systemized Orthodontic Treatment Mechanics. Elsevier Health Sciences.

Musich DR. and Ackerman JL. 1973. The cantenometer: A reliable device for estimating dental arch perimeter. Am J Orthod., 63:366-75.

Richard A. Riedel. 1960. A review of retention problem. Angle Orthod., 30:179-94

Ricketts RM. 1979. Bioprogressive therapy. Book 1. U.S.A: Rocky Mountain Orthodontics.

Riedel R.A. 1969. Current orthodontic concepts and techniques, Graber T.M., WB Saunders Co.

Robert H.W. Strang. 1946. Factors of influence in producing a stable result in the treatment of malocclusion. Am J Orthod Oral Surg., Jun; 32:313-323

Roth RH, Swain TG. Orthodontics: Current Principle and technique. Louis: CV Mosby Company; 1985.

Rudolph L. Hanau. 1917. The Hawley arch form considered from an engineering stand point- a scientific substitute. Int J Orthod., 635-665

Brader AC. Dental arch form related to intra-oral force: PR = C, Am J Orthod 1972; 61: 541-561.

Published

31-07-2021

How to Cite

Singh, D. (2021). Arch form: A review. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(S1), 358–367. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5nS1.5666

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles