Cone-beam computed tomography

A new era in clinical orthodontics

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5nS1.5677

Authors

  • Disha Singh PG Student 1st Year, Department of Orthodontics, Desh Bhagat Dental College & Hospital, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, India

Keywords:

CBCT, cone-beam CT, CBCT review

Abstract

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is an important source of three‐dimensional volumetric data in clinical orthodontics. Due to the progress in the technology of CBCT, for orthodontic clinical diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up, it supply much more reliable information compared to conventional radiography. But it carries both risks and benefits in orthodontics and the principal risks and limitations include ionizing radiation, the presence of artifacts, higher cost, limited accessibility, and the need for additional training. However, this imaging modality has several recognized indications in orthodontics, such as the assessment of impacted and ectopic teeth, assessment of pharyngeal airway, assessment of mini-implant sites, evaluation of craniofacial abnormalities, evaluation of sinus anatomy or pathology, evaluation of root resorption, evaluation of the cortical bone plate, and orthognathic surgery planning and evaluation. CBCT is particularly justified when it brings a benefit to the patient or changes the outcome of the treatment when compared with conventional imaging techniques.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

De Vos, W.; Casselman, J.; Swennen, G.R. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: A systematic review of the literature. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2009, 38, 609–625. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Leonardi, R. Cone-beam computed tomography and three-dimensional orthodontics. Where we are and future perspectives. J. Orthod. 2019, 46, 45–48. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Hall, E.; Giaccia, A. Radiobiology for the Radiologist, 6th ed.; Lippincott Williams and Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2006; pp. 135–153.

Buttke, T.M.; Proffit, W.R. Referring adult patients for orthodontic treatment. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 1999, 130, 73–79. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Kleinerman, R.A. Cancer risks following diagnostic and therapeutic radiation exposure in children. Pediatr. Radiol. 2006, 36 (Suppl. 2), 121–125. [CrossRef]

Applegate, K.E.; Thomas, K. Pediatric CT—The challenge of dose records. Pediatr. Radiol. 2011, 41 (Suppl. 2), 523–527. [CrossRef]

Bulas, D.I.; Goske, M.J.; Applegate, K.E.; Wood, B.P. Image Gently: Why we should talk to parents about CT in children. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2009, 192, 1176–1178. [CrossRef]

Brenner, D.J. Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: Going from the qualitative to the quantitative. Pediatr. Radiol. 2002, 32, 228–221; discussion 242–244. [CrossRef]

Chodick, G.; Ronckers, C.M.; Shalev, V.; Ron, E. Excess lifetime cancer mortality risk attributable to radiation exposure from computed tomography examinations in children. Isr. Med. Assoc. J. IMAJ 2007, 9, 584–587.

Isaacson, K.G.; Thom, A.R.; Atack, N.E.; Horner, K.; Whaites, E. Orthodontic Radiographs: Guidelines for the Use of Radiographs in Clinical Orthodontics, 4th ed.; British Orthodontic Society: London, UK, 2015.

Applegate, K.E.; Cost, N.G. Image Gently: A campaign to reduce children’s and adolescents’ risk for cancer during adulthood. J. Adolesc. Health 2013, 52, S93–S97. [CrossRef]

Farman, A.G. ALARA still applies. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2005, 100, 395–397. [CrossRef]

Brenner, D.; Elliston, C.; Hall, E.; Berdon, W. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2001, 176, 289–296. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Slovis, T.L. Children, computed tomography radiation dose, and the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) concept. Pediatrics 2003, 112, 971–972. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

European Commission. European Guidelines on Radiation Protection in Dental Radiology. Radiation Protection 136 Luxembourg: 2004. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/136.pdf (accessed on 10 August 2019).

Hoffman, F.O.; Kocher, D.C.; Apostoaei, A.I. Beyond dose assessment: Using risk with full disclosure of uncertainty in public and scientific communication. Health Phys. 2011, 101, 591–600. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

McCollough, C.H.; Schueler, B.A. Calculation of effective dose. Med. Phys. 2000, 27, 828–837. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Mozzo, P.; Procacci, C.; Tacconi, A.; Martini, P.T.; Andreis, I.A. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: Preliminary results. Eur. Radiol. 1998, 8, 1558–1564. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Mah, J.K.; Danforth, R.A.; Bumann, A.; Hatcher, D. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2003, 96, 508–513. [CrossRef]

Bechara, B.; McMahan, C.A.; Geha, H.; Noujeim, M. Evaluation of a cone beam CT artefact reduction algorithm. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiol. 2012, 41, 422–428. [CrossRef]

Danforth, R.A.; Peck, J.; Hall, P. Cone beam volume tomography: An imaging option for diagnosis of complex mandibular third molar anatomical relationships. J. Calif. Dent. Assoc. 2003, 31, 847–852.

Sukovic, P. Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 2003, 6 (Suppl. 1), 31–36; discussion 179–182. [CrossRef]

Silva, M.A.; Wolf, U.; Heinicke, F.; Bumann, A.; Visser, H.; Hirsch, E. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: A radiation dose evaluation. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2008, 133, 640.e1–640.e5. [CrossRef]

Bornstein, M.M.; Scarfe, W.C.; Vaughn, V.M.; Jacobs, R. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: A systematic review focusing on guidelines, indications, and radiation dose risks. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2014, 29, 55–77. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Roberts, J.A.; Drage, N.A.; Davies, J.; Thomas, D.W. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Br. J. Radiol. 2009, 82, 35–40. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

McCollough, C.H.; Bushberg, J.T.; Fletcher, J.G.; Eckel, L.J. Answers to Common Questions About the Use and Safety of CT Scans. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2015, 90, 1380–1392. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Hedesiu, M.; Marcu, M.; Salmon, B.; Pauwels, R.; Oenning, A.C.; Almasan, O.; Roman, R.; Baciut, M.; Jacobs, R. Irradiation provided by dental radiological procedures in a pediatric population. Eur. J. Radiol. 2018, 103, 112–117. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Pauwels, R.; Beinsberger, J.; Collaert, B.; Theodorakou, C.; Rogers, J.; Walker, A.; Cockmartin, L.; Bosmans, H.; Jacobs, R.; Bogaerts, R.; et al. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur. J. Radiol. 2012, 81, 267–271. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Ludlow, J.B.; Davies-Ludlow, L.E.; Brooks, S.L.; Howerton, W.B. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiol. 2006, 35, 219–226. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Yeung, A.W.K.; Jacobs, R.; Bornstein, M.M. Novel low-dose protocols using cone beam computed tomography in dental medicine: A review focusing on indications, limitations, and future possibilities. Clin. Oral Investig. 2019, 23, 2573–2581. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Mah, J.K.; Danforth, R.A. Comparative direct dosimetry of cone-beam computed tomography using reduced basis projections. J. Clin. Orthod. JCO 2018, 52, 173–179.

Oenning, A.C.; Pauwels, R.; Stratis, A.; De Faria Vasconcelos, K.; Tijskens, E.; De Grauwe, A.; Jacobs, R.; Salmon, B. Halve the dose while maintaining image quality in paediatric Cone Beam CT. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5521. [CrossRef]

Pauwels, R.; Jacobs, R.; Bogaerts, R.; Bosmans, H.; Panmekiate, S. Determination of size-specific exposure settings in dental cone-beam CT. Eur. Radiol. 2017, 27, 279–285. [CrossRef]

Ludlow, J.B.; Walker, C. Assessment of phantom dosimetry and image quality of i-CAT FLX cone-beam computed tomography. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2013, 144, 802–817. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Kapila, S.; Conley, R.S.; Harrell, W.E., Jr. The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiol. 2011, 40, 24–34. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Oenning, A.C.; Jacobs, R.; Pauwels, R.; Stratis, A.; Hedesiu, M.; Salmon, B. Cone-beam CT in paediatric dentistry: DIMITRA project position statement. Pediatr. Radiol. 2018, 48, 308–316. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Ludlow, J.B.; Timothy, R.; Walker, C.; Hunter, R.; Benavides, E.; Samuelson, D.B. Correction to Effective dose of dental CBCT—A meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiol. 2015, 44, 20159003. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Jacobs, R.; Pauwels, R.; Scarfe, W.C.; De Cock, C.; Dula, K.; Willems, G.; Verdonck, A.; Politis, C. Pediatric cleft palate patients show a 3-to 5-fold increase in cumulative radiation exposure from dental radiology compared with an age-and gender-matched population: A retrospective cohort study. Clin. Oral Investig. 2018, 22, 1783–1793. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Marcu, M.; Hedesiu, M.; Salmon, B.; Pauwels, R.; Stratis, A.; Oenning, A.C.C.; Cohen, M.E.; Jacobs, R.; Baciut, M.; Roman, R.; et al. Estimation of the radiation dose for pediatric CBCT indications: A prospective study on ProMax3D. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2018, 28, 300–309. [CrossRef]

Pauwels, R.; Jacobs, R.; Bogaerts, R.; Bosmans, H.; Panmekiate, S. Reduction of scatter-induced image noise in cone beam computed tomography: Effect of field of view size and position. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2016, 121, 188–195. [CrossRef]

Newaz, Z.A.; Barghan, S.; Katkar, R.A.; Bennett, J.A.; Nair, M.K. Incidental findings of skull-base abnormalities in cone-beam computed tomography scans with consultation by maxillofacial radiologists. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2015, 147, 127–131. [CrossRef]

Okano, T.; Harata, Y.; Sugihara, Y.; Sakaino, R.; Tsuchida, R.; Iwai, K.; Seki, K.; Araki, K. Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiol. 2009, 38, 79–85. [CrossRef]

Garcia Silva, M.A.; Wolf, U.; Heinicke, F.; Grundler, K.; Visser, H.; Hirsch, E. Effective dosages for recording Veraviewepocs dental panoramic images: Analog film, digital, and panoramic scout for CBCT. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2008, 106, 571–577. [CrossRef]

Gijbels, F.; Jacobs, R.; Bogaerts, R.; Debaveye, D.; Verlinden, S.; Sanderink, G. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: Patient exposure. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiol. 2005, 34, 145–149. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Lecomber, A.R.; Yoneyama, Y.; Lovelock, D.J.; Hosoi, T.; Adams, A.M. Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for dental implant planning using conventional radiography and computed tomography. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiol. 2001, 30, 255–259. [CrossRef]

Theodorakou, C.; Walker, A.; Horner, K.; Pauwels, R.; Bogaerts, R.; Jacobs, R. Estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms. Br. J. Radiol. 2012, 85, 153–160. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Gavala, S.; Donta, C.; Tsiklakis, K.; Boziari, A.; Kamenopoulou, V.; Stamatakis, H.C. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography. Eur. J. Radiol. 2009, 71, 42–48. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Gijbels, F.; Sanderink, G.; Wyatt, J.; Van Dam, J.; Nowak, B.; Jacobs, R. Radiation doses of indirect and direct digital cephalometric radiography. Br. Dent. J. 2004, 197, 149–152; discussion 140. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Ludlow, J.B.; Davies-Ludlow, L.E.; Brooks, S.L. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiol. 2003, 32, 229–234. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Danforth, R.A.; Dus, I.; Mah, J. 3-D volume imaging for dentistry: A new dimension. J. Calif. Dent. Assoc. 2003, 31, 817–823.

Signorelli, L.; Patcas, R.; Peltomaki, T.; Schatzle, M. Radiation dose of cone-beam computed tomography compared to conventional radiographs in orthodontics. J. Orofac. Orthop. 2016, 77, 9–15. [CrossRef]

Ludlow, J.B.; Ivanovic, M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2008, 106, 106–114. [CrossRef]

Tsiklakis, K.; Donta, C.; Gavala, S.; Karayianni, K.; Kamenopoulou, V.; Hourdakis, C.J. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT. Eur. J. Radiol. 2005, 56, 413–417. [CrossRef]

Ludlow, J.B.; Davies-Ludlow, L.E.; White, S.C. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: The impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2008, 139, 1237–1243. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Hans, M.G.; Palomo, J.M.; Valiathan, M. History of imaging in orthodontics from Broadbent to cone-beam computed tomography. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2015, 148, 914–921. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Huda, W.; Atherton, J.V.; Ware, D.E.; Cumming, W.A. An approach for the estimation of effective radiation dose at CT in pediatric patients. Radiology 1997, 203, 417–422. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

White, S.C.; Scarfe, W.C.; Schulze, R.K.; Lurie, A.G.; Douglass, J.M.; Farman, A.G.; Law, C.S.; Levin, M.D.; Sauer, R.A.; Valachovic, R.W.; et al. The Image Gently in Dentistry campaign: Promotion of responsible use of maxillofacial radiology in dentistry for children. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2014, 118, 257–261. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Mettler, F.A., Jr.; Thomadsen, B.R.; Bhargavan, M.; Gilley, D.B.; Gray, J.E.; Lipoti, J.A.; McCrohan, J.; Yoshizumi, T.T.; Mahesh, M. Medical radiation exposure in the U.S. in 2006: Preliminary results. Health Phys. 2008, 95, 502–507. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Fazel, R.; Krumholz, H.M.; Wang, Y.; Ross, J.S.; Chen, J.; Ting, H.H.; Shah, N.D.; Nasir, K.; Einstein, A.J.; Nallamothu, B.K. Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 361, 849–857. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Brenner, D.J.; Doll, R.; Goodhead, D.T.; Hall, E.J.; Land, C.E.; Little, J.B.; Lubin, J.H.; Preston, D.L.; Preston, R.J.; Puskin, J.S.; et al. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 13761–13766. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Yeh, J.K.; Chen, C.H. Estimated radiation risk of cancer from dental cone-beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics patients. BMC Oral Health 2018, 18, 131. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Pauwels, R. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial imaging: Dose matters. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2015, 165, 156–161. [CrossRef]

American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. The use of dental radiographs: Update and recommendations. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2006, 137, 1304–1312.

Kamburoglu, K. Use of dentomaxillofacial cone beam computed tomography in dentistry. World J. Radiol. 2015, 7, 128–130. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Weiss, R., 2nd; Read-Fuller, A. Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: An Evidence-Based Review. Dent. J. 2019, 7, 52. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Hsieh, J.; Molthen, R.C.; Dawson, C.A.; Johnson, R.H. An iterative approach to the beam hardening correction in cone beam CT. Med. Phys. 2000, 27, 23–29. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Pauwels, R.; Stamatakis, H.; Bosmans, H.; Bogaerts, R.; Jacobs, R.; Horner, K.; Tsiklakis, K. Quantification of metal artifacts on cone beam computed tomography images. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2013, 24 (Suppl. A100), 94–99. [CrossRef]

Hirschinger, V.; Hanke, S.; Hirschfelder, U.; Hofmann, E. Artifacts in orthodontic bracket systems in cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography. J. Orofac. Orthop. 2015, 76, 152–163. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Endo, M.; Tsunoo, T.; Nakamori, N.; Yoshida, K. Effect of scattered radiation on image noise in cone beam CT. Med. Phys. 2001, 28, 469–474. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Coskun, I.; Kaya, B. Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics. Turk. J. Orthod. 2018, 31, 55–61. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Alqerban, A.; Jacobs, R.; Fieuws, S.; Nackaerts, O.; Willems, G. Comparison of 6 cone-beam computed tomography systems for image quality and detection of simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2011, 140, e129–e139. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Mischkowski, R.A.; Pulsfort, R.; Ritter, L.; Neugebauer, J.; Brochhagen, H.G.; Keeve, E.; Zoller, J.E. Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2007, 104, 551–559. [CrossRef]

Moreira, C.R.; Sales, M.A.; Lopes, P.M.; Cavalcanti, M.G. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic images. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2009, 108, 430–436. [CrossRef]

El, H.; Palomo, J.M. Measuring the airway in 3 dimensions: A reliability and accuracy study. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2010, 137, e51–e59; discussion S50–S52. [CrossRef]

Al-Ekrish, A.A.; Ekram, M. A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiol. 2011, 40, 67–75. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Ganguly, R.; Ruprecht, A.; Vincent, S.; Hellstein, J.; Timmons, S.; Qian, F. Accuracy of linear measurement in the Galileos cone beam computed tomography under simulated clinical conditions. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiol. 2011, 40, 299–305. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Gribel, B.F.; Gribel, M.N.; Frazao, D.C.; McNamara, J.A., Jr.; Manzi, F.R. Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scans. Angle Orthod. 2011, 81, 26–35. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Timock, A.M.; Cook, V.; McDonald, T.; Leo, M.C.; Crowe, J.; Benninger, B.L.; Covell, D.A., Jr. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2011, 140, 734–744. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Razavi, T.; Palmer, R.M.; Davies, J.; Wilson, R.; Palmer, P.J. Accuracy of measuring the cortical bone thickness adjacent to dental implants using cone beam computed tomography. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2010, 21, 718–725. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Horner, K.; Islam, M.; Flygare, L.; Tsiklakis, K.; Whaites, E. Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: Consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiol. 2009, 38, 187–195. [CrossRef]

Brown, J.; Jacobs, R.; Levring Jaghagen, E.; Lindh, C.; Baksi, G.; Schulze, D.; Schulze, R. Basic training requirements for the use of dental CBCT by dentists: A position paper prepared by the European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiol. 2014, 43, 20130291. [CrossRef]

Jerrold, L. Litigation, legislation, and ethics. Liability regarding computerized axial tomography scans. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2007, 132, 122–124. [CrossRef]

Turpin, D.L. Befriend your oral and maxillofacial radiologist. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2007, 131, 697. [CrossRef]

Friedland, B. Medicolegal issues related to cone beam CT. Semin. Orthod. 2009, 15, 77–84. [CrossRef]

American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Clinical recommendations regarding use of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics. [corrected]. Position statement by the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2013, 116, 238–257. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Zinman, E.J.; White, S.C.; Tetradis, S. Legal considerations in the use of cone beam computer tomography imaging. J. Calif. Dent. Assoc. 2010, 38, 49–56. [PubMed]

Abdelkarim, A.; Jerrold, L. Clinical considerations and potential liability associated with the use of ionizing radiation in orthodontics. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2018, 154, 15–25. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Lombardo, L.; Arreghini, A.; Guarneri, M.P.; Lauritano, D.; Nardone, M.; Siciliani, G. Unexpected artefacts and occult pathologies under CBCT. Oral Implantol. 2017, 10, 97–104. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Curley, A.; Hatcher, D.C. Cone beam CT—Anatomic assessment and legal issues: The new standards of care. J. Calif. Dent. Assoc. 2009, 37, 653–662. [PubMed]

Bruks, A.; Enberg, K.; Nordqvist, I.; Hansson, A.S.; Jansson, L.; Svenson, B. Radiographic examinations as an aid to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Swed. Dent. J. 1999, 23, 77–85. [PubMed]

Atchison, K.A.; Luke, L.S.; White, S.C. An algorithm for ordering pretreatment orthodontic radiographs. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 1992, 102, 29–44. [CrossRef]

Dindaroglu, F.; Yetkiner, E. Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics. Turk. J. Orthod. 2016, 29, 16–21. [CrossRef]

American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: An advisory statement from the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2012, 143, 899–902.

De Grauwe, A.; Ayaz, I.; Shujaat, S.; Dimitrov, S.; Gbadegbegnon, L.; Vande Vannet, B.; Jacobs, R. CBCT in orthodontics: A systematic review on justification of CBCT in a paediatric population prior to orthodontic treatment. Eur. J. Orthod. 2018. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Chinem, L.A.; Vilella Bde, S.; Mauricio, C.L.; Canevaro, L.V.; Deluiz, L.F.; Vilella Ode, V. Digital orthodontic radiographic set versus cone-beam computed tomography: An evaluation of the effective dose. Dent. Press J. Orthod. 2016, 21, 66–72. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Dula, K.; Benic, G.I.; Bornstein, M.; Dagassan-Berndt, D.; Filippi, A.; Hicklin, S.; Kissling-Jeger, F.; Luebbers, H.T.; Sculean, A.; Sequeira-Byron, P.; et al. SADMFR Guidelines for the Use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/Digital Volume Tomography. Swiss Dent. J. 2015, 125, 945–953. [PubMed]

Greco, P.M. Ethics in orthodontics. Let the truth be known. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2013, 144, 788–789. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Alqerban, A.; Willems, G.; Bernaerts, C.; Vangastel, J.; Politis, C.; Jacobs, R. Orthodontic treatment planning for impacted maxillary canines using conventional records versus 3D CBCT. Eur. J. Orthod. 2014, 36, 698–707. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Hujoel, P.P.; Aps, J.K.; Bollen, A.M. What are the cancer risks from dental computed tomography? J. Dent. Res. 2015, 94, 7–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Halazonetis, D.J. Cone-beam computed tomography is not the imaging technique of choice for comprehensive orthodontic assessment. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2012, 141, 407. [CrossRef]

Kokich, V.G. Cone-beam computed tomography: Have we identified the orthodontic benefits? Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2010, 137, S16. [CrossRef]

Van Vlijmen, O.J.; Kuijpers, M.A.; Berge, S.J.; Schols, J.G.; Maal, T.J.; Breuning, H.; Kuijpers-Jagtman, A.M. Evidence supporting the use of cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2012, 143, 241–252. [CrossRef]

Tadinada, A.; Marczak, A.; Yadav, S.; Mukherjee, P.M. Applications of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics: A Review. Turk. J. Orthod. 2016, 29, 73–79. [CrossRef]

Merrett, S.J.; Drage, N.A.; Durning, P. Cone beam computed tomography: A useful tool in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. J. Orthod. 2009, 36, 202–210. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Maverna, R.; Gracco, A. Different diagnostic tools for the localization of impacted maxillary canines: Clinical considerations. Prog. Orthod. 2007, 8, 28–44. [PubMed]

Liu, D.G.; Zhang, W.L.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Wu, Y.T.; Ma, X.C. Localization of impacted maxillary canines and observation of adjacent incisor resorption with cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2008, 105, 91–98. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Published

31-07-2021

How to Cite

Singh, D. (2021). Cone-beam computed tomography: A new era in clinical orthodontics. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(S1), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5nS1.5677

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)