Comparison of the stress response and intubating performance in endotracheal intubation with Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscopes
A randomized study
Keywords:
IDS, Laryngoscopy, Macintosh, McCoy laryngoscopeAbstract
Introduction: Laryngoscopy and intubation cause stress response and sympathetic stimulation within the body. Attenuation of these changes by pharmacological means and improved technique with modified instruments is of absolute importance, for stable hemodynamics of the patients. Aim: Comparison of stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation, Intubation Difficulty Score (IDS) using Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscopes. Material and methods: After obtaining institutional ethical committee approval and patient consent in this randomized study, sixty patients of ASA grade I and II, posted for elective surgery under general anaesthesia were intubated with Macintosh or McCoy laryngoscopes. Changes in heart rate, mean arterial pressure, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were observed upto 15 minutes after laryngoscopy, along with IDS. Results: McCoy group when compared with Macintosh group had significant reduction in heart rate at T0 (p value <0.0001), systolic blood pressure at T0, T1 and T15 (p value < 0.001), diastolic blood pressure at T0, T10 and T15 (p value <0.05), mean arterial blood pressure at T0, T10 and T15 (p value <0.05) was observed in this study. Conclusion: Hemodynamic stress response with McCoy blade laryngoscope was reduced in magnitude in comparison with Macintosh blade laryngoscope.
Downloads
References
İnangil G, Cansız KH, Gürbüz F, Bakal Ö, Gökben FM, Şen H. Comparison of hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation with the GlideScope video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2018;26(3):386-393. Published 2018 Jul 3. doi:10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.15716 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.15716
Kumar A, Seth A, Prakash S, Deganwa M, Gogia AR. Attenuation of the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation with fentanyl, lignocaine nebulization, and a combination of both: A randomized controlled trial. Anesth Essays Res. 2016;10(3):661-666. doi:10.4103/0259-1162.191113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.191113
Haidry MA, Khan FA. Comparison of hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation with Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscopes. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013;29(2):196-199. doi:10.4103/0970-9185.111710 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.111710
Gertler R, Brown HC, Mitchell DH, Silvius EN. Dexmedetomidine: a novel sedative-analgesic agent. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2001;14(1):13-21. doi:10.1080/08998280.2001.11927725 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2001.11927725
Varon J, Marik PE. Perioperative hypertension management. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4(3):615-627. doi:10.2147/vhrm.s2471 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S2471
Paul A, Nathroy A. Comparison of hemodynamic changes during laryngoscopy with McCoy and Macintosh laryngoscopes. J Health Res Rev 2017;4:35-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2394-2010.199325
Niyogi S, Biswas A, Chakraborty I, Chakraborty S, Acharjee A. Attenuation of haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation with dexmedetomidine: A comparison between intravenous and intranasal route. Indian J Anaesth. 2019;63(11):915-923. doi:10.4103/ija.IJA_320_19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_320_19
Altun, Demet et al. “Haemodynamic Response to Four Different Laryngoscopes.” Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation vol. 46,6 (2018): 434-440. doi:10.5152/TJAR.2018.59265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2018.59265
Yadav, Pratishtha et al. “Comparison between Macintosh, Miller and McCoy laryngoscope blade size 2 in paediatric patients - A randomised controlled trial.” Indian journal of anaesthesia vol. 63,1 (2019): 15-20. doi:10.4103/ija.IJA_307_18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_307_18
Kanchi M, Nair HC, Banakal S, Murthy K, Murugesan C. Haemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation in coronary artery disease: Direct versus video laryngoscopy. Indian J Anaesth. 2011;55(3):260-265. doi:10.4103/0019-5049.82673 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.82673
Bruder N, Ortega D, Granthil C. Conséquences et moyens de prévention des modifications hémodynamiques lors de la laryngoscopie et de l'intubation endotrachéale [Consequences and prevention methods of hemodynamic changes during laryngoscopy and intratracheal intubation]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1992;11(1):57-71. French. doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(05)80321-1. PMID: 1359816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0750-7658(05)80321-1
Aggarwal H, Kaur S, Baghla N, Kaur S. Hemodynamic Response to Orotracheal Intubation: Comparison between Macintosh, McCoy, and C-MAC Video Laryngoscope. Anesth Essays Res. 2019;13(2):308-312. doi:10.4103/aer.AER_7_19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_7_19
Tewari P, Gupta D, Kumar A SU. Opioid sparing during endotracheal intubation using McCoy laryngoscope in neurosurgical patients: the comparison of haemodinamyc changes with Macintosh blade in a randomized. J Postgraduation Med. 2019.
Han TS, Kin JA, Park NG, Lee SM, Cho HS, Chung IS. A comparison of the effects of different type of laryngoscope on hemodynamics. McCoy versus the Macintosh blade. Korean J Anasthesiol. 1999;37:398–401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.1999.37.3.398
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.