Comparative study of intrathecal bupivacaine and bupivacaine with clonidine to assess degree of sensory and motor effect and postoperative analgesia in lower limb orthopedic surgeries

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.6672

Authors

  • Nilesh Shah Associate professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Shrimati Bhikhiben Kanjibhai Shah Medical Institute and Research center, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth (An Institute Deemed to be university), Piparia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
  • Anupama Kumari Assistant professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Shrimati Bhikhiben Kanjibhai Shah Medical Institute and Research center, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth (An Institute Deemed to be university), Piparia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
  • Brinda Parekh 3rd year resident, Department of Anesthesiology, Shrimati Bhikhiben Kanjibhai Shah Medical Institute and Research center, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth (An Institute Deemed to be university), Piparia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
  • Dinesh Chauhan Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Shrimati Bhikhiben Kanjibhai Shah Medical Institute and Research center, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth (An Institute Deemed to be university), Piparia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

Keywords:

Clonidine, Bupivacaine, spinal anesthesia, analgesia

Abstract

Background: Subarachnoid blockade amongst regional anesthesia has been most commonly used for performing abdominal and umbilical surgeries. There is persistent search for finding an adjuvant to local anesthetics to prolong its action along with hemodynamic stability. In this study we have used clonidine as an adjuvant to local anaesthetic agent and have assessed its ability to prolong motor and sensory blockade and hemodynamic stability. Methods: This observational study was conducted on 56 patients of ASA grade I/II, undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgeries who were divided into 2 groups: Group B : Injection 3.0 ml hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.5% + 0.12 ml normal saline was given intrathecally and Group C : Injection 3.0 ml Bupivacaine (0.5% hyperbaric) + 0.12 ml injection clonidine (20 mcg) was given intrathecally. We compared duration of sensory and motor blockade, hemodynamic changes, duration of analgesia and complications in both groups. Result:  The onset of sensory and motor blockage was comparable in both groups. Duration of sensory and motor blockade was significantly longer in Group C than group B (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, respectively).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wiebke Gogarten. Spinal anaesthesia for obstetrics. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology. 2003; 17(3): 377-392

Gentili M and Bonnet F, Spinal clonidine produces less urinary retention than spinal morphine, British Journal of anaesthesia.1996;76:872-873.

Chiari A, Eisenach JC. Spinal anesthesia: Mechanisms, agents, methods, and safety. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998;23:357–62.

Gouroji SK, Suma KV, Katlinge PK, A comparative study between isobaric levobupivacaine and isobaric levobupivacaine with fentanyl in patients posted for lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries under spinal anaesthesia, Indian J Clinical Anesthesia 2019;6(3):446-9

Patil KN, Singh ND. Clonidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine-induced supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper limb surgeries. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol., 2015;31(3):365-369.

Shah, Z., Kundal, R., Gupta, A., Malla, M., Zahoor, F., Kundal, V., & Qazi, S,Efficacy of analgesic effect of low dose intrathecal clonidine as adjuvant to bupivacaine in urogenital surgeries: Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology, (2012). 20(1).

Sethi BS, Samuel M, Sreevastava D., Efficacy of analgesic effects of low dose intrathecal clonidine as adjuvant to bupivacaine. Indian J Anaesth. 2007;51:415–9.

Merivirta, R., Kuusniemi, K., Jaakkola, P., Pihlajamäki, K., & Pitkänen, M Unilateral spinal anaesthesia for outpatient surgery: a comparison between hyperbaric bupivacaine and bupivacaine–clonidine combination. Acta anaesthesiologica scandinavica, . (2009). 53(6), 788-793.

Fettes, P. D. W., Jansson, J. R., & Wildsmith, J. A. W. Failed spinal anaesthesia: mechanisms, management, and prevention. British journal of anaesthesia, 2009; 102(6), 739-748

Arora, P., Joseph, J., Upadya, M., & Bhat, S.. Epidural clonidine as an adjuvant to local anesthetic in lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries: A randomised controlled study. The Open Anesthesia Journal, 2020;14(1).

Shende S, Bhargava S, Chakravarty N, Patel N, Dave SP. Comparison of Bupivacaine 0.5% and Bupivacaine + Clonidine Intrathecally for intraoperative and Postoperative analgesia in Lower Limb Orthopaedic Surgeries. Int J Med Res Rev 2014;2(4):328- 332.

H Saxena, S Singh, S Ghildiyal. Low Dose Intrathecal Clonidine With Bupivicaine Improves Onset And Duration Of Block With Haemodynamic Stability. The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology. 2009 Volume 23 Number .

Singh, R. B., Chopra, N., Choubey, S., Tripathi, R. K., Prabhakar, & Mishra, A. Role of Clonidine as adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacaine in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery: A randomized control study. Anesthesia, essays and researches, 2014; 8(3), 307–312.

Nikila Devarayasamudram Gopal, Threja Chintamani Krishnappa, Anand T. Talikoti et al. Comparative Study of Intrathecal Bupivacaine with 50 and 75 µg Clonidine in Lower Abdominal Surgeries. Indian J Anesth Analg. 2018;5(11):1854¬61.

Bhat Ravindra R, Mathew Jibin Sam, Balachander Hemavathy et al. Evaluation of Clonidine as an Additive to Bupivacaine for Central Neuraxial Blockade. Indian J Anesth Analg. 2020;7(1 Part -II):311-318.

Published

27-04-2022

How to Cite

Shah, N., Kumari, A., Parekh, B., & Chauhan, D. (2022). Comparative study of intrathecal bupivacaine and bupivacaine with clonidine to assess degree of sensory and motor effect and postoperative analgesia in lower limb orthopedic surgeries. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S1), 7715–7725. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.6672

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles