A study of lumbar lordosis angle on digital radiographs and its co-relation with demographic parameters and occupation in north Indian population

Rekha Parashar; Navneet Parashar; Bhawna Thakur

doi:10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.6449

Authors

Rekha Parashar Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, National Institute of Medical Sciences University, Jaipur
Navneet Parashar Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Government Medical, Kota
Bhawna Thakur
thakurbhawna04900@gmail.com
Research Scholar, Department of Anatomy, National Institute of Medical Sciences University, Jaipur

Keywords:

lumbar lordosis angle, lumbo-sacral region, evaluation, spinal disorders

Abstract

Introduction: Lumbar lordosis can be defined as the curvature assumed by intact lumbar spine to provide resilience and protection from the compressive forces. Measurement of lumbar lordosis angle is used to evaluate the stability of this region. The purpose of the study was to assess lumbar lordosis angle and its correlation with demographic parameters and occupation in the North Indian population as there is relative paucity of data.Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study in 500 subjects. The digital radiographs in lateral view of the lumbo sacral spine in erect position were obtained and lumbar lordosis angle were evaluated using Radiant Dicom Software. The lumbar lordosis angle was measured along with demographic parameters were noted. Results: The mean values of lumbar lordosis angle was found to be LLA=39.40⁰±9.20⁰. There was a positive correlation of lumbar lordosis angle with weight, BMI, HC and WC of the subjects. The lumbar lordosis angle didn’t observe any significant relationship with occupation.Conclusion: The mean value of lumbar lordosis angle was 39.40⁰±9.20⁰. The results of the present study show significant greater angle in females.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Oliver J, Middleditch A. Functional Anatomy of the Spine. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998. Lumbar spine; pp. 36–58.

Jha AK, Ravi C. A Study of normal variation in lumbosacral angle in asymptomatic patients attending orthopaedic out-patient department of a medical college hospital, Telangana.Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Surgery, January - March,2018;4(1):16 – 20.

N.O.Onyemaechi. Evaluation of lumbar angles and their clinical correlates in a Nigerian population. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 2017;4(6), pp.2018-2023..

Agichani S, Joshi SD, Joshi SS. Evaluation of lumbosacral angle amongst central Indians. J. Evolution Med. Dent. Sci. 2017;6(83):5797-5801.

Lord MJ, Small JM, Dinsay JM, Watkins RG: Lumbar lordosis. Effects of sitting and standing. Spine. 1997; 22: 2571–2574.

Chernukha, K. V., Daffner, R. H., & Reigel, D. H. (1998). Lumbar lordosis measurement: a new method versus Cobb technique. Spine, 23(1), 74-79.

H. F. Farfan, R. M. Huberdeau, and H. I. Dubow, “Lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration: the influence of geometrical features on the pattern of disc degeneration–a post mortem study,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American.1972; 54( 3): 492–510.

El Sayed S, Saab IM, EI Shishtawy M, et al. Morphometric study of the lumbosacral spine and some of its related angles in Lebanese adult females. IJAE 2014;119(2):92-105.

Endo K., Suzuki H., Tanaka H., Kang Y., Yamamoto K. (2010): Sagittal spinal alignment in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Eur. Spine J. 19: 435-443.

Fernand R, Fox DE. Evaluation of lumbar lordosis. A prospectiveand retrospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1985;10:799‑803.

Caglayan M, Tacar O, Demirant A, Oktayoglu P,Karakoc M,Cetin A, Em S, Bozkurt M, Ucar D, Kemal Nas. Effects of Lumbosacral Angles on Development of Low Back Pain. Journal Of Musculoskeletal Pain. 2014. 22;3: 251–255.

Nakipoglu GF, Karagoz A, Ozgirgin N. The biomechanics of the lumbosacral region in acute and chronic low back pain patients. Pain Physician 2008;11(4): 505-11.

Esmailiejah AA, Qoreishy M, Keipourfard A, Babaei S. Changes in Lumbosacral Angles in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Prospective Study. American Journal of Medical Case Reports 2017. 5; 6:163-165.

Stagnara P, De Mauroy JC, Dran G et al. Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in a sagittal plane : Approach to references for the evaluation of kyphosis and lordosis. Spine. 1982;7:335-342.

Murrie, V. L., Dixon, A. K., Hollingworth, W., Wilson, H., & Doyle, T. A. (2003). Lumbar lordosis: study of patients with and without low back pain. Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 16(2), 144–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.10114.

Youdas, J. W., Garrett, T. R., Egan, K. S., & Therneau, T. M. (2000). Lumbar lordosis and pelvic inclination in adults with chronic low back pain. Physical therapy, 80(3), 261–275.

Amonoo-Kuofi HS. Changes in the Lumbosacral Angle, Sacral inclination and Lumbar Spine during Ageing. Acta Anatomica 1992.145;4:373-7.

Song MY, Chung WS, Kim SS, Shin HD. Correlation between Obesity and Lumbar Lordosis in Obese Pre-Menopausal Korean Females. Korean Journal of Oriental Medicine. 2004; 25(4): 43-50.

Tsuji T et al. Epidemiology of low back pain in the elderly: correlation with lumbar lordosis. J Orthop Sci .2001; 6:307–311.

Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L, Templier A, Skalli W, Guigui P. Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87: 260–267.

Tuzun C, Yorulmaz, Cindas A, Vatan S. Low Back Pain and Posture. Clin Rheumatol 1999;18:308–312