Bureaucratic culture of state civil servants in the implementation of national health insurance policy for the poor people in Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6n2.6726

Authors

  • Abu Huraerah Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Pasundan Bandung, Indonesia
  • Yuyun Yuningsih Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Pasundan Bandung, Indonesia
  • Umi Hani Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Pasundan Bandung, Indonesia
  • Husmiati Yusuf National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia
  • Sakroni Bandung Polytechnic of Social Welfare, Indonesia
  • Adi Fahrudin Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya, Indonesia

Keywords:

bureaucratic culture, implementation, national health insurance, policy, the poor people

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explain the bureaucratic culture of state civil servants in the implementation of a national health insurance policy for the poor people in Indonesia. This study used qualitative research methods. Meanwhile, data collection used in-depth interviews, observation, and document study. Data analysis consists of data reduction, data display, conclusions drawing, and verification. The results of this study indicate that the performance of the state civil servants in implementing health insurance still has bureaucratic culture: pragmatic concerning the interests of the Government, bureaucratic in the mechanism for submitting the participation of contribution assistance recipients (beneficiaries), rigidity in the interaction of work tasks, non-participation in the data collection process for the contribution assistance recipients and short-term orientation in achieving membership targets. Therefore, the government must change the mindset of the behavior of the bureaucracy by transforming bureaucratic culture through learning in change management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bessant, J., Watts, R., Dalton, T., & Smyth, P. (2020). Talking policy: how social policy is made. Routledge.

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford university press.

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. sage.

Cresswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions.

Dwiyanto, A. (2012). Reformasi Birokrasi Publik di Indonesia (Jilid Dua).

Ernawati, K., Nugroho, B. S., Suryana, C., Riyanto, A., & Fatmawati, E. (2022). The advantages of digital applications in public health services on automation era. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(1), 174-186. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6n1.3684

Gil, D.G. (1973). Understanding public policy. 10th edition). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall

Gilbert, N., Specht, H., & Terrell, P. (1993). Dimensions of social welfare policy. 3rd edition. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall

Grol, R., & Grimshaw, J. (2003). From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. The lancet, 362(9391), 1225-1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1

Hsieh, C. Y., Chen, C. H., Li, C. Y., & Lai, M. L. (2015). Validating the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke in a National Health Insurance claims database. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 114(3), 254-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2013.09.009

Huttman, E. D. (1981). Introduction to social policy. McGraw-Hill Companies.

Lim, B. (2013). Korean medicine coverage in the National Health Insurance in Korea: present situation and critical issues. Integrative Medicine Research, 2(3), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2013.06.004

Lynch, J. W., Kaplan, G. A., & Salonen, J. T. (1997). Why do poor people behave poorly? Variation in adult health behaviours and psychosocial characteristics by stages of the socioeconomic lifecourse. Social science & medicine, 44(6), 809-819. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00191-8

Macintyre, S., McKay, L., & Ellaway, A. (2005). Are rich people or poor people more likely to be ill? Lay perceptions, by social class and neighbourhood, of inequalities in health. Social science & medicine, 60(2), 313-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.001

Midgley, J. (2009). The institutional approach to social policy. In James Midgley & Michelle Livermore, (eds.), The Handbook of Social Policy. London: Sage Publication, Inc.

Midgley, James & Sherraden, Michael. (2000). The Social development perspective in social policy. In Midgley, at. Al. (eds.), The Handbook of Social Policy. London: Sage Publication, Inc.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Revisi). Bandung: PT remaja rosdakarya.

Mukti, A. G. (2007). Reformasi sistem pembiayaan kesehatan di Indonesia dan prospek ke depan. Pusat Manajemen Pembiayaan dan Asuransi Kesehatan UGM, Yogyakarta.

Neo, B. S., & Chen, G. (2007). Dynamic governance: Embedding culture, capabilities and change in Singapore (English version). World Scientific.

Pant, D. P., Allinson, C. W., & Hayes, J. (1996). Transferring the western model of project organisation to a bureaucratic culture: The case of Nepal. International Journal of Project Management, 14(1), 53-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(95)00039-9

Sallis, J., Bauman, A., & Pratt, M. (1998). Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activity. American journal of preventive medicine, 15(4), 379-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00076-2

Simmonds, A., & Hort, K. (2013). Institutional analysis of Indonesia’s proposed road map to universal health coverage. Health Policy and Health Finance Knowledge Hub Working Paper, 33.

Spiker, P. (1995). Social policy: themes and approaches. London: Prentice-Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf

Starfield, B., & Shi, L. (2002). Policy relevant determinants of health: an international perspective. Health policy, 60(3), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00208-1

Statistical Year Book of Indonesia (2022). Published by Statistics Indonesia

Sunjaya, D. K. (2010). Perubahan organisasional dinas kesehatan:: Studi kasus peningkatan fungsi regulasi Dinas Kesehatan Kota Bandung dan Kota Yogyakarta (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Gadjah Mada).

Thoha, M. (2014). Lembaga Birokrasi dalam Negara. Prisma, 2, 12-22.

Tjiptoherijanto, P. & Manurung, M. (2014). Reformasi Pelayanan Publik. Dalam Merombak Birokrasi, Prisma, Jurnal Pemikiran Sosial Ekonomi, Volume 33, 2014

Wahlgren, N., Ahmed, N., Dávalos, A., Ford, G. A., Grond, M., Hacke, W., ... & Sits-Most Investigators. (2007). Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST): an observational study. The Lancet, 369(9558), 275-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60149-4

WHO. (2000). World Health Report 2000: Health system: improving performance. Geneva

Wihantoro, Y., Lowe, A., Cooper, S., & Manochin, M. (2015). Bureaucratic reform in post-Asian crisis Indonesia: The directorate general of tax. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 31, 44-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2015.04.002

Yusuf, E., & Awwaliyah, I. (2018). The Implementation of Indonesian National Health Insurance Programme: How Satisfiedwerethe Insured Participants and the Healthcare Providers?. Journal of Consumer Sciences, 3(2), 27-42.

Published

05-05-2022

How to Cite

Huraerah, A., Yuningsih, Y., Hani, U., Yusuf, H., Sakroni, S., & Fahrudin, A. (2022). Bureaucratic culture of state civil servants in the implementation of national health insurance policy for the poor people in Indonesia. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(2), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6n2.6726

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles