Comparative evaluation of coronal sealing ability of light cure temporary restorative materials with conventional temporary restorative material using stereomicroscope

An in vitro study

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.6802

Authors

  • Sreeja Nair MDS, PG Student, Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital Navi Mumbai, Sector 7 CBD Belapur, Navi Mumbai 400614
  • Amit Patil MDS, Associate Professor, PG Guide, Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital Navi Mumbai, Sector 7 CBD Belapur, Navi Mumbai 400614
  • Ashish K Jain MDS, Professor and Head of Department, Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital Navi Mumbai, Sector 7 CBD Belapur, Navi Mumbai 400614
  • Sheetal Mali MDS, Associate Professor, PG Guide, Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital Navi Mumbai, Sector 7 CBD Belapur, Navi Mumbai 400614
  • Rahul D Rao MDS, Professor, PG Guide, Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital Navi Mumbai, Sector 7 CBD Belapur, Navi Mumbai 400614
  • Himmat Jaiswal MDS, Assistant professor, Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital Navi Mumbai, Sector 7 CBD Belapur, Navi Mumbai 400614

Keywords:

microleakage, temporary restorative materials, dye penetration method, cavit G

Abstract

Background: The coronal seal is a crucial factor in success of endodontic therapy. Hence the aim of the present study was to assess the sealing ability by evaluating microleakage of three different types of interim restorative materials. Method: A total of 80 extracted human premolars were divided randomly in to 4 groups. Group A: Control group, Group B: Systemp Inlay, Group C: Temp IT Blue, Group D: Cavit-G. Standardized access cavity preparation was done followed by placement of cotton pellet in the access cavity, Interim restorative materials were placed as per the assigned group of restorative materials. Teeth were stained with 2% methylene blue solution for 1 week after which all the teeth were analysed for dye penetration under stereomicroscope. Statistical analysis of data was done using one-way ANOVA and Post Hoc Tukey test with a significance level of P ≤ 0.05. Results: Systemp Inlay showed the least micro leakage value followed by Temp.it blu and Cavit G. Intergroup comparison showed statistically significant difference between Systemp Inlay and other groups whereas Temp IT Blue and Cavit G showed no statistical significance. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Sivakumar JS, Kumar BN, Shyamala PV. Role of provisional restorations in endodontic therapy. Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences. 2013 Jun;5(Suppl 1):S120.

Jensen AL, Abbott PV, Salgado JC. Interim and temporary restoration of teeth during endodontic treatment. Australian dental journal. 2007 Mar;52:S83-99.

Zaia AA, Nakagawa R, De Quadros I, Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. An in vitro evaluation of four materials as barriers to coronal microleakage in root-filled teeth. Int Endod J. 2002;35:729-34.

Siqueira Jr JF. Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well‐treated teeth can fail. International endodontic journal. 2001 Jan;34(1):1-0.

Djouiai B, Wolf TG. Tooth and temporary filling material fractures caused by Cavit, Cavit W and Coltosol F: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2021 Dec;21(1):1-8.

Križnar, I.; Seme, K.; Fidler, A. Bacterial microleakage of temporary filling materials used for endodontic access cavity sealing. J. Dent. Sci. 2016, 11, 394–400. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Prabhakar, A.R.; Rani, N.S.; Naik, S.V. Comparative evaluation of sealing ability, absorption, and solubility of three temporary restorative materials: An in vitro study. Int. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2017, 10, 136–141. [CrossRef]

Srivastava, P.K.; Nagpal, A.; Setya, G.; Kumar, S.; Chaudary, A.; Dhanker, K. Assessment of coronal leakage of temporary restorations in root canal treated teeth: An in vitro study. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2017, 18, 126–130. [CrossRef]

Shahi, S.; Samiei, S.; Rahimi, S.; Nezami, H. In vitro comparison of dye penetration through four temporary restorative materials. Iran. Endod. J. 2010, 5, 59–63.

Kim, S.-Y.; Ahn, J.-S.; Yi, Y.-A.; Lee, Y.; Hwang, J.-Y.; Seo, D.-G. Quantitative microleakage analysis of endodontic temporary filling materials using a glucose penetration model. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2015, 73, 137–143. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Çiftçi A, Vardarlı DA, Sönmez IŞ. Coronal microleakage of four endodontic temporary restorative materials: an in vitro study. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2009 Oct 1;108(4):e67-70.

Tapsir Z, Ahmed HM, Luddin N, Husein A. Sealing ability of various restorative materials as coronal barriers between endodontic appointments. The journal of contemporary dental practice. 2013 Jan 1;14(1):47.

Vail MM, Steffel CL. Preference of temporary restorations and spacers: a survey of Diplomates of the American Board of Endodontists. Journal of Endodontics. 2006 Jun 1;32(6):513-5.

Nagpal A, Srivastava PK, Setya G, Chaudhary A, Dhanker K. Assessment of coronal leakage of temporary restorations in root canal-treated teeth: an in vitro study. The journal of contemporary dental practice. 2017 Feb 1;18(2):126-30.

Devika WE, Jayalakshmil D. A review on temporary restorative materials. Int J Pharmaceut Sci Res. 2016;7:320-4.

Thu KM, Aye KS, Htang A. In vitro study of Coronal Leakage of Four Temporary Filling Materials Immersed in Alcoholic Methylene Blue Dye. Myanmar Dental Journal. 2013 Mar 15;20(1).

Webber RT, Carlos E, Brady JM, Segall RO. Sealing quality of a temporary filling material. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 1978 Jul 1;46(1):123-30.

MB Ü. Microleakage of different types of temporary restorative materials used in endodontics. Journal of oral science. 2000;42(2):63-7.

Naseri M, Ahangari Z, Moghadam MS, Mohammadian M. Coronal sealing ability of three temporary filling materials. Iranian endodontic journal. 2012;7(1):20.

Zmener O, Banegas G, Pameijer CH. Coronal microleakage of three temporary restorative materials: an in vitro study. Journal of endodontics. 2004 Aug 1;30(8):582-4.

Shahi S, Samiei M, Rahimi S, Nezami H. In vitro comparison of dye penetration through four temporary restorative materials. Iranian endodontic journal. 2010;5(2):59.

Adnan S, Khan FR. Comparison of micro-leakage around temporary restorative materials placed in complex endodontic access cavities: an in-vitro study. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. 2016;26(3):182.

Babu NS, Bhanushali PV, Bhanushali NV, Patel P. Comparative analysis of microleakage of temporary filling materials used for multivisit endodontic treatment sessions in primary teeth: an in vitro study. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2019 Dec;20(6):565-70.

Hamed S, Zaazou A, Leheta N. Evaluation of two different materials for pre-endodontic restoration of badly destructed teeth. Alexandria Dental Journal. 2015 Jul 1;40(1):58-64.

Križnar I, Seme K, Fidler A. Bacterial microleakage of temporary filling materials used for endodontic access cavity sealing. Journal of dental sciences. 2016 Dec 1;11(4):394-400.

Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Lee MS, Tu LS, DeLong R. Can hygroscopic expansion compensate polymerization shrinkage? Part I. Deformation of restored teeth. Dental materials. 2011 Feb 1;27(2):126-33.

Kidd EA. Microleakage: a review. Journal of dentistry. 1976 Sep 1;4(5):199-206.

Qvist V. The effect of mastication on marginal adaptation of composite restorations in vivo. Journal of dental research. 1983 Aug;62(8):904-6.

Published

30-04-2022

How to Cite

Nair, S., Patil, A., Jain, A. K., Mali, S., Rao, R. D., & Jaiswal, H. (2022). Comparative evaluation of coronal sealing ability of light cure temporary restorative materials with conventional temporary restorative material using stereomicroscope: An in vitro study. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S2), 7192–7199. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.6802

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles