Autogenous tooth graft with platelet rich fibrin versus autogenous tooth graft only around immediate dental implant

Ahmed Sameir Abdel Raheim Gabr; Mohsen Fawzy Aboelhasan; Hossam Eldin Mohammed Ali; Mohamed Mahgob AlAshmawy; Mohammed Gamal Abdelftah Hamed Elsaid

doi:10.53730/ijhs.v6nS4.7094

Authors

Ahmed Sameir Abdel Raheim Gabr
dentistahmed8843@gmail.com
Specialist at Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Al-Ebrahemia hospital, Sharkia, Egypt
Mohsen Fawzy Aboelhasan Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine - Boys, Al-Azhar University – Assiut branch, Assiut, Egypt
Hossam Eldin Mohammed Ali Assistant Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine - Boys, Al-Azhar University – Assiut branch, Assiut, Egypt
Mohamed Mahgob AlAshmawy Assistant Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine - Boys, Al-Azhar University – Assiut branch, Assiut, Egypt
Mohammed Gamal Abdelftah Hamed Elsaid Assistant Lecturer of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine - Boys, Al-Azhar University – Assiut branch, Assiut, Egypt

Keywords:

autogenous fresh tooth graft, platelet rich fibrin mixture, immediate dental implant placement

Abstract

Objective: This trial was conducted to compare between autogenous fresh tooth graft with/without platelet rich fibrin around immediate dental implant. Patients and methods: This controlled randomized clinical trial was carried out on 12 patients over the age of 18 who required dental extractions of single- or multi-rooted teeth, who were also delayed candidates for osseointegrated implants. They were equally divided into two groups; group (1): Autogenous fresh tooth graft around immediate dental implant placement with platelet rich fibrin and group (2): Autogenous fresh tooth graft around immediate dental implant placement without platelet rich fibrin. Results: The mean value of horizontal bone loss in group (1) and group (2) at 6 months 0.077 (0.065 -0.130) and 0.595 (0.450 - 0.690) respectively with statistical significant differences between two groups. While vertical bone loss in group(1) and group(2) at 6 months (0.510(0.480 -0.530) and (1.490(1.400 - 1.640) respectively with statistical significant differences between two groups. The mean value of implant stability quotient for group (2) at 3 months was 70.50 ± 3.56 ISQ, and increased to 77.67 ± 5.61 ISQ at 6 months, which was statistically significant.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cardaropoli G, Araújo M, Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30:809-18. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00366.x

Cawood JI, Howell RA. Reconstructive preprosthetic surgery. I. Anatomical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991;20:75-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80711-8

Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31:820-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00565.x

Lang NP, Pun L, Lau KY, et al. A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23 Suppl 5:39-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02372.x

Jeong TM, Lee JK. The Efficacy of the Graft Materials after Sinus Elevation: Retrospective Comparative Study Using Panoramic Radiography. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;36:146-53. https://doi.org/10.14402/jkamprs.2014.36.4.146

Kühl S, Götz H, Brochhausen C, et al. The influence of substitute materials on bone density after maxillary sinus augmentation: a microcomputed tomography study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27:1541-6.

Kim YK, Kim SG, Byeon JH, et al. Development of a novel bone grafting material using autogenous teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109:496-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.017

Pohl V, Schuh C, Fischer MB, et al. A New Method Using Autogenous Impacted Third Molars for Sinus Augmentation to Enhance Implant Treatment: Case Series with Preliminary Results of an Open, Prospective Longitudinal Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31:622-30. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4172

Jun SH, Ahn JS, Lee JI, et al. A prospective study on the effectiveness of newly developed autogenous tooth bone graft material for sinus bone graft procedure. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014;6:528-38. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.6.528

Lee du H, Yang KY, Lee JK. Porcine study on the efficacy of autogenous tooth bone in the maxillary sinus. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;39:120-6. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2013.39.3.120

Kim G, Yeo I, Kim S, et al. Analysis of crystalline structure of autogenous tooth bone graft material: X-Ray diffraction analysis. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;37:225-8.

Moon JW, Sohn DS, Heo JU, et al. New bone formation in the maxillary sinus using peripheral venous blood alone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:2357-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.092

Choukroun J, Diss A, Simonpieri A, et al. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): a second-generation platelet concentrate. Part V: histologic evaluations of PRF effects on bone allograft maturation in sinus lift. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101:299-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.07.012

Dohan DM, Choukroun J, Diss A, et al. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): a second-generation platelet concentrate. Part II: platelet-related biologic features. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101:e45-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.07.009

Vittorini Orgeas G, Clementini M, De Risi V, et al. Surgical techniques for alveolar socket preservation: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28:1049-61. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2670

Van der Weijden F, Dell'Acqua F, Slot DE. Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36:1048-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01482.x

Horowitz R, Holtzclaw D, Rosen PS. A review on alveolar ridge preservation following tooth extraction. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012;12:149-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1532-3382(12)70029-5

Widmark G, Andersson B, Ivanoff CJ. Mandibular bone graft in the anterior maxilla for single-tooth implants. Presentation of surgical method. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;26:106-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80827-6

Fellah BH, Gauthier O, Weiss P, et al. Osteogenicity of biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics and bone autograft in a goat model. Biomaterials. 2008;29:1177-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.11.034

Kim YK, Lee J, Um IW, et al. Tooth-derived bone graft material. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;39:103-11. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2013.39.3.103

Zhang S, Li X, Qi Y, et al. Comparison of Autogenous Tooth Materials and Other Bone Grafts. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2021;18:327-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-021-00333-4

van Orten A, Goetz W, Bilhan H. Tooth-Derived Granules in Combination with Platelet-Rich Fibrin ("Sticky Tooth") in Socket Preservation: A Histological Evaluation. Dent J (Basel). 2022;10. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10020029

Kim YK, Kim SG, Oh JS, et al. Analysis of the inorganic component of autogenous tooth bone graft material. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2011;11:7442-5. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2011.4857

Kim YK, Yun PY, Um IW, et al. Alveolar ridge preservation of an extraction socket using autogenous tooth bone graft material for implant site development: prospective case series. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014;6:521-7. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.6.521

Kim ES. Autogenous fresh demineralized tooth graft prepared at chairside for dental implant. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;37:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-015-0009-1

Kizildağ A, Taşdemir U, Arabaci T, et al. Evaluation of New Bone Formation Using Autogenous Tooth Bone Graft Combined with Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Calvarial Defects. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30:1662-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000005413

Yüceer-Çetiner E, Özkan N, Önger ME. Effect of Autogenous Dentin Graft on New Bone Formation. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32:1354-60. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000007403

Bormann KH, Suarez-Cunqueiro MM, Sinikovic B, et al. Dentin as a suitable bone substitute comparable to ß-TCP--an experimental study in mice. Microvasc Res. 2012;84:116-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mvr.2012.06.004

Cardaropoli D, Nevins M, Schupbach P. New Bone Formation Using an Extracted Tooth as a Biomaterial: A Case Report with Histologic Evidence. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019;39:157-63. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.4045

Kim MG, Lee JH, Kim GC, et al. The effect of autogenous tooth bone graft material without organic matter and type I collagen treatment on bone regeneration. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;43:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-021-00302-w

Qu C, Luo F, Hong G, et al. Effects of platelet concentrates on implant stability and marginal bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21:579. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01929-x

Buser D, Chappuis V, Kuchler U, et al. Long-term stability of early implant placement with contour augmentation. J Dent Res. 2013;92:176s-82s. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513504949

Warren P, Chaffee N, Felton DA, et al. A retrospective radiographic analysis of bone loss following placement of TiO2 grit-blasted implants in the posterior maxilla and mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:399-404.

Koodaryan R, Hafezeqoran A. Evaluation of Implant Collar Surfaces for Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:4987526. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4987526

Hartlev J, Schou S, Isidor F, et al. A clinical and radiographic study of implants placed in autogenous bone grafts covered by either a platelet-rich fibrin membrane or deproteinised bovine bone mineral and a collagen membrane: a pilot randomised controlled clinical trial with a 2-year follow-up. Int J Implant Dent. 2021;7:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00289-z

Almasoud NN, Tanneru N, Marei HF. Alveolar bone density and its clinical implication in the placement of dental implants and orthodontic mini-implants. Saudi Med J. 2016;37:684-9. https://doi.org/10.15537/Smj.2016.6.14274