Bioceramic a futuristic boon in endodontics

A review

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.7356

Authors

  • Lalit Darade Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, D Y Patil School of Dentistry, Nerul, Mumbai
  • Smita Ranjan Private Practitioner, Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Kumhrar, Patna
  • Gangesh Bahadur Singh Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Government Dental College, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
  • B.V.M. Gangadhar Postgraduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sree Sai Dental College and Research Institute, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
  • Mansi Vandekar Professor and HOD, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, D Y Patil School of Dentistry, Nerul, Mumbai
  • Akshita Govind Rathi Postgraduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, V.Y.W.S Dental College and Hospital, Amravati

Keywords:

Biomaterial, Bioceramic, Endodontics

Abstract

Background: The ultimate goal of root canal treatment is prevention or healing of apical periodontitis. The use of biologically active materials to seal root canal systems has been extensively proposed in contemporary endodontics to realise this goal. There are several commercial formulations of bioceramics available based on minor variations in composition which could have potentially important changes in properties in the clinical situation. This narrative review serves to provide brief information on the different formulations of bioactive ceramics that are available to a dentist. Aim: To give an overview of bioceramics used in endodontics, their classification, advantages and disadvantages. This review also gives insights about each biomaterial in detail and its use in endodontics. Review Results: Continuous innovations have led to bioceramics showing a variety of applications in both endodontic and restorative dentistry. While MTA was the benchmark in bioceramics materials, material advances have constantly tried to overcome disadvantages and improve its properties. Conclusion: Bioceramics now have a wide array of applications both in endodontics and restorative dentistry. However, considering the biological advantages of bioceramics materials, their use in multiple paradigms of endodontic therapy appears to be the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Williams DF. On the nature of biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2009 Oct 1;30(30):5897-909.

Best SM, Porter AE, Thian ES, Huang J. Bioceramics: past, present and for the future. Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 2008 Jan 1;28(7):1319-27.

Mangat P, Azhar S, Singh G, Masarat F, Yano N, Sah S. Bioceramics in endodontics: A review. Int J Oral Care Res 2021;9:59-62.

Dorozhkin SV. Kudrinskaja square, Moscow, Russia. Octacalcium Phosphate Biomaterials: Understanding of Bioactive Properties and Application. 2019 Nov 20:213.

Nasseh A. The rise of bioceramics. Endod Practice 2009;2:17-22.

Jain P, Ranjan M. The rise of biocramics in endodontics: A review. Int J Pharm Bio Sci 2015;6(1):416-422.

Niu LN, Jiao K, Wang TD, Zhang W, Camilleri J, Bergeron BE, Feng HL, Mao J, Chen JH, Pashley DH, Tay FR. A review of the bioactivity of hydraulic calcium silicate cements. J Dent 2014;42:517-33.

Haapasalo M, Parhar M, Huang X, Wei X, Lin J, Shen Y. Clinical use of bioceramic materials Endod Topics. 2015;32:97-117.

Lee SJ, Monsef M, Torabinejad M. Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate for repair of lateral root perforations. J Endod 1993;19:541-4.

Torabinejad M, Watson TF, Pitt Ford TR. Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregare when used as a root end filling material. J Endod 1993; 19:591-5

Torabinejad M, Higa RK, McKendry DJ, Pitt Ford TR. Dye leakage of four root end filling materials: effects of blood contamination. J Endod 1994;20:159–163.

Torabinejad M, Hong CU, Pitt Ford TR, Kettering JD. Cytotoxicity of four root end filling materials. J Endod. 1995;21:489–492.

Dawood AE, Parashos P, Wong RH, Reynolds EC, Manton DJ. Calcium silicate‐based cements: composition, properties, and clinical applications. Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry. 2017 May;8(2):e12195.

Kum KY, Zhu Q, Safavi K, Gu Y, Bae KS, Chang SW.Analysis of six heavy metals in Ortho mineral trioxide aggregate and ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry. Aust Endod J 2013; 39:126-130.

Bortoluzzi EA, Araújo GS, Guerreiro Tanomaru JM, Tanomaru-Filho M. Marginal gingiva discoloration by gray MTA: a case report. J Endod 2007;33:325-7.

Torabinejad M, Hong CU, Lee SJ, Monsef M, Pitt Ford TR. Investigation of mineral trioxide aggregate for root-end filling in dogs. J Endod. 1995;21:603–608.

Koh ET, Torabinejad M, Pitt Ford TR, Brady K, McDonald F. Mineral trioxide aggregate stimulates a biological response in human osteoblasts. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;37:432–439.

Torabinejad M, Hong CU, McDonald F, Pitt Ford TR. Physical and chemical properties of a new root-end filling material. J Endod. 1995;21:349–353.

Schembri Wismayer P, Lung CY, Rappa F, Cappello F, Camilleri J. Assessment of the interaction of Portland cement-based materials with blood and tissue fluids using an animal model. Sci Rep 2016; 6:34547

Kang CM, Sun Y, Song JS, Pang NS, Roh BD, Lee CY, Shin Y. A randomized controlled trial of various MTA materials for partial pulpotomy in permanent teeth. J Dent 2016;5712(16)30142-7

Jang Y, Song M, Yoo IS, Song Y, Roh BD, Kim E.A Randomized Controlled Study of the Use of ProRoot Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Endocem as Direct Pulp Capping Materials: 3-month versus 1-year Outcomes. J Endod 2015;41:1201-6.

Shen Y, Peng B, Yang Y, Ma J, Happasalo M. What do different tests tell about the mechanical and biological properties of bioceramic materials? Endod Topics. 2015;32:47-85

Koh ET, Torabinejad M, Pitt Ford TR, Brady K, McDonald F. Mineral trioxide aggregate stimulates a biological response in human osteoblasts. J Biomed Mater Res.1997;37:432–439.

Tawil PZ, Duggan DJ, Galicia JC. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA): its history, composition, and clinical applications. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2015;36:247-52

Viola NV, Tanomaru Filho M, Cerri PS. Mta versus portland cement: Review of literature. Rev Sul-bras Odontol 2011;8(4):446-452.

Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: A comprehensive literature review—part i: Chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties. J Endod 2010;36(1):16-27.

Emine ST, Tuba UA. White mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomies: Two case reports with longterm follow-up. Contemp Clin Dent 2011;2(4):381-384.

Camilleri J, Sorrentino F, Damidot D. Investigation of the hydration and bioactivity of radiopacified tricalcium silicate cement, Biodentine and MTA Angelus. Dent Mater. 2013;29:580-93.

Neelakantan P, Grotra D, Sharma S. Retreatability of 2 mineral trioxide aggregate-based root canal sealers: a cone-beam computed tomography analysis. J Endod 2013; 39:893-6.

Raghavendra SS, Jadhav GR, Gathani KM, Kotadia P. Bioceramics in endodontics–a review. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry. 2017;51(3 Suppl 1):S128.

Singh H, Kaur M, Markan S, Kapoor P. Biodentine: A promising dentin substitute. J Interdiscipl Med Dent Sci 2014;2:140.

Arora V, Nikhil V, Sharma N, Arora P. Bioactive dentin replacement. J Dent Med Sci 2013;12:51-57.

Ghoddusi J. Material modifications and related materials. InMineral Trioxide Aggregate in Dentistry 2014 (pp. 131-149). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Saxena P, Gupta SK, Newaskar V. Biocompatibility of root-end filling materials: Recent update. Restor Dent Endod 2013;38(3):119-127.

Hench LL. Bioceramics: From concept to clinic. J Am Ceram Soc 1991;74(7):1487-1510.

LeGeros RZ. Calcium phosphate materials in restorative dentistry: A review. Adv Dent Res 1988;2(1):164-180.

Skrtic D, Antonucci JM, Eanes ED, Eichmiller FC, Schumacher GE. Physicochemical evaluation of bioactive polymeric composites based on hybrid amorphous calcium phosphates. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53(4):381-391.

Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Calcium silicate–based cements in mineral trioxide aggregate: Properties and clinical applications. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2014.

Camilleri J, Sorrentino F, Damidot D. Characterization of un-hydrated and hydrated bioaggregate and MTA angelus. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19(3):689-698.

Ghoddusi J. Material modifications and related materials. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2014.

Lovato KF, Sedgley CM. Antibacterial activity of endosequence root repair material and Proroot MTA against clinical isolates of enterococcus faecalis. J Endod 2011;37(11):1542-1546.

Asgary S, Shahabi S, Jafarzadeh T, Amini S, Kheirieh S. The properties of a new endodontic material. J Endod 2008;34(8):990-993.

Asgary S, Akbari Kamrani F, Taheri S. Evaluation of antimicrobial effect of mta, calcium hydroxide, and cem cement. Iran Endod J 2007;2(3):105-109.

Chang JW, Praisarnti C, Neelakantan P. Increasing use of bioceramics in endodontics: A narrative review. Oral health. 2017.

DeLong C, He J, Woodmansey KF. The effect of obturation technique on the push-out bond strength of calcium silicate sealers. J Endod. 2015;41;385-8.

Published

14-05-2022

How to Cite

Darade, L., Ranjan, S., Singh, G. B., Gangadhar, B. V. M., Vandekar, M., & Rathi, A. G. (2022). Bioceramic a futuristic boon in endodontics: A review. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S1), 9934–9942. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.7356

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)