Coronal restoration of endodontically treated posterior teeth
A review
Keywords:
Post-endodontic restoration, endodontically treated teeth, root canal treated teethAbstract
There is still no consensus on the restoration of endodontically treated posterior teeth in the most appropriate way. With the development of adhesive materials with improved properties and a shift in approach towards minimally invasive dentistry, there is a paradigm change in the restorative modalities of root-filled teeth. Conventionally endodontically treated teeth were restored with post and core followed by a crown, but conservative restorative options have gained popularity with the advancements in adhesive techniques. Many studies have been done, but there is a need to re-explore the scholarly literature with the changing trend. This review article provides a brief overview of the literature on the survival of endodontically treated posterior teeth in relation to the type of post endodontic restoration. A literature search of papers related to the survival of endodontically treated teeth and type of post endodontic restorations published till July 2021 was undertaken in PubMed, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Science direct. A few of the keywords searched were: post endodontic restorations, survival, clinical performance, root canal treated teeth, endodontically treated teeth, success, resin composite, crown, cuspal coverage restoration.
Downloads
References
Ng Y-L, Mann V, Gulabivala & K. Tooth survival following non-surgical root canal treatment: a systematic review of the literature. Int Endod J. 2010;43:171-189. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01671.x
Landys Borén D, Jonasson P, Kvist T. Long-term survival of endodontically treated teeth at a public dental specialist clinic. J Endod. 2015;41(2):176-181. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2014.10.002
/ire DE. Failure of endodontically treated teeth: classification and evaluation. J Endod. 1991;17(7):338-342.
Vârlan C, Dimitriu B, Vârlan V, Bodnar D, Suciu I. Current opinions concerning the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: basic principles. J Med Life. 2009;2(2):165-172.
Trushkowsky RD. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: criteria and technique considerations. Quintessence Int. 2014;45(7):557-567. doi:10.3290/j.qi.a31964
Pedrollo Lise D, Van Ende A, De Munck J, Umeda Suzuki TY, Cardoso Vieira LC, Van Meerbeek B. Biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars using different preparation designs and CAD/CAM materials. J Dent. 2017;59:54-61. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2017.02.007
Magne P DW. Cumulative effects of successive restorative procedures on anterior crown flexure: intact versus veneered incisors. Quintessence Int. 2000;31(1):5-18. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11203907/
Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, Sadan A. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature, Part II (Evaluation of fatigue behavior, interfaces, and in vivo studies). Quintessence Int. 2008;39(2):117-129. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18560650
Goracci C, Ferrari M. Current perspectives on post systems: A literature review. Aust Dent J. 2011;56(SUPPL. 1):77-83. doi:10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01298.x
Heydecke G, Peters MC. The restoration of endodontically treated, single-rooted teeth with cast or direct posts and cores: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(4):380-386. doi:10.1067/mpr.2002.123848
Zhou L, Wang Q. Comparison of fracture resistance between cast posts and fiber posts: A meta-analysis of literature. J Endod. 2013;39(1):11-15. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2012.09.026
Magne P, Goldberg J, Edelhoff D, Güth JF. Composite resin core buildups with and without post for the restoration of endodontically treated molars without ferrule. Oper Dent. 2016;41(1):64-75. doi:10.2341/14-258-L
Güth JF, Edelhoff D, Goldberg J, Magne P. CAD/CAM polymer vs direct composite resin core buildups for endodontically treated molars without ferrule. Oper Dent. 2016;41(1):53-63. doi:10.2341/14-256-L
Naumann M, Schmitter M, Frankenberger R, Krastl G. “Ferrule Comes First. Post Is Second!” Fake News and Alternative Facts? A Systematic Review. J Endod. 2018;44(2):212-219. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2017.09.020
Bhuva B, Giovarruscio M, Rahim N, Bitter K, Mannocci & F. The restoration of root filled teeth: a review of the clinical literature. Int Endod J. 2020;54:509-35.doi:10.1111/iej.13438
Juloski J, Radovic I, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Ferrule effect: A literature review. J Endod. 2012;38(1):11-19. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.024
Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater. 2015;31(6):603-623. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.011
Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CHF. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part I: Single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(SUPPL. 3):73-85. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01467.x
Archibald JJ, Santos GC, Moraes Coelho Santos MJ. Retrospective clinical evaluation of ceramic onlays placed by dental students. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(5):743-748.e1. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.004
Otto T MW. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM feldspathic ceramic posterior shoulder crowns and endocrowns up to 12 years. Int J Comput Dent. 2015;18(2):147-161. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26110927/
Fages M, Raynal J, Tramini P, Cuisinier F, Durand J-C. Chairside Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacture All-Ceramic Crown and Endocrown Restorations: A 7-Year Survival Rate Study. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;30(6):556-560. doi:10.11607/ijp.5132
Lin CL, Chang YH, Chang CY, Pai CA, Huang SF. Finite element and Weibull analyses to estimate failure risks in the ceramic endocrown and classical crown for endodontically treated maxillary premolar. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010;118(1):87-93. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00704.x
de Carvalho MA, Lazari PC, Gresnigt M, Del Bel Cury AA, Magne P. Current options concerning the endodontically-treated teeth restoration with the adhesive approach. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:147-158. doi:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0074
Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: A study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;51(6):780-784. doi:10.1016/0022-3913(84)90376-7
Aquilino SA CD. Relationship between crown placement and the survival of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(3):256-263. doi:10.1067/mpr.2002.122014
Nandini S. Indirect resin composites. J Conserv Dent. 2010;13(4):184-194. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.4103%2F0972-0707.73377
Krejci I, Duc O, Dietschi D, De Campos E. Marginal adaptation, retention and fracture resistance of adhesive composite restorations on devital teeth with and without posts. Oper Dent. 2003;28(2):127-135.
Chrepa V, Konstantinidis I, Kotsakis GA, Mitsias ME. The survival of indirect composite resin onlays for the restoration of root filled teeth: A retrospective medium-term study. Int Endod J. 2014;47(10):967-973. doi:10.1111/iej.12242
Belli S, Eraslan O, Eskitascioglu G. Direct Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth: a Brief Summary of Materials and Techniques. Curr Oral Heal Reports. 2015;2(4):182-189. doi:10.1007/s40496-015-0068-5
Dammaschke T, Nykiel K, Sagheri D, Schäfer E. Influence of coronal restorations on the fracture resistance of root canal-treated premolar and molar teeth: A retrospective study. Aust Endod J. 2013;39(2):48-56. doi:10.1111/aej.12002
Lynch CD, Burke FM, Ní Ríordáin R HA. The influence of coronal restoration type on the survival of endodontically treated teeth. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2004;12(4):171-176. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15691191/
Touré B, Faye B, Kane AW, Lo CM, Niang B, Boucher Y. Analysis of reasons for extraction of endodontically treated teeth: A prospective study. J Endod. 2011;37(11):1512-1515. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2011.07.002
Sequeira-Byron P, Fedorowicz Z, Carter B, Nasser M, Alrowaili EF. Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root-filled teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(9). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009109.pub3
Shu X, Mai Q-Q, Blatz M, Price R, Wang X-D, Zhao K. Direct and Indirect Restorations for Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, IAAD 2017 Consensus Conference Paper. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(3):183-194. doi:10.3290/j.jad.a40762
Frankenberger R, Zeilinger I, Krech M, et al. Stability of endodontically treated teeth with differently invasive restorations: Adhesive vs. non-adhesive cusp stabilization. Dent Mater. 2015;31(11):1312-1320. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2015.08.160
Aboobaker S, Nair BG, Gopal R, Jituri S, Veetil FRP. Effect of intra-orifice barriers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth – An ex-vivo study. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2015;9(2):ZC17-ZC20. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2015/11609.5552
RF M, SK I, O de OF, J M. Fracture resistance of weakened teeth restored with condensable resin with and without cusp coverage. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17(3):161-165. doi:10.1590/S1678-77572009000300006
Plotino G, Buono L, Grande NM, Lamorgese V, Somma F. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99(3):225-232. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60047-5
Bianchi E Silva AA méli., Ghiggi PC ristin., Mota EG onçalve., Borges GA ntoni., Burnett LH enriqu., Spohr AM ari. Influence of restorative techniques on fracture load of endodontically treated premolars. Stomatologija. 2013;15(4):123-128.
Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod. 1989;15(11):512-516. doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(89)80191-8
Abu-Awwad M. A modern guide in the management of endodontically treated posterior teeth. Eur J Gen Dent. 2019;8(3):63-70. doi:10.4103/ejgd.ejgd-76-19
Soner Şişmanoğlu. Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Review of Direct Restorative Approach. Heal Sci. 2020;2(1):21-40.
Scotti N, Rota R, Scansetti M, et al. Influence of adhesive techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with various residual wall thicknesses. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;110(5):376-382. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.08.001
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
