Comparative assessment of the accuracy of ceramic orthodontic brackets to 0.022-inch stainless steel slots in orthodontic patients

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5nS1.7457

Authors

  • Wagisha Barbi BDS, MDS, Senior Resident, Department of Dentistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar
  • Priyadarshini Rangari Associate professor, Department of Dentistry, Sri Shankaracharya Medical College, Bhilai, Durg, Chhattisgarh
  • Amarpal Kour Chhabada BDS, Gandhi Dental College, Bhubaneswar, Odisha
  • Shahshank Katiyar Assistant Professor, Department of Dentistry, Sri Shankaracharya Medical College, Bhilai, Durg, Chhattisgarh

Keywords:

ceramic bracket, distal face base, mesial face base, stainless steel bracket, slot width, stereomicroscope

Abstract

Background: Brackets are the passive components that transfer the force to the teeth by elastomeric chains, springs, and the arch wire. The arch wire placement in a bracket that is pre-adjusted is done to construct three-dimensional forces to move the tooth. Aim: The present study was conducted to compare and assess the accuracy of ceramic orthodontic brackets to 0.022-inch stainless steel slots in orthodontic patients. Materials and Methods: The present in-vitro study included a maxillary lateral incisor of the left side where 0.022 MBT American orthodontics (AO) slots as placed with 15 ceramic and 15 stainless steel brackets were placed and divided into 6 groups of 90 subjects. Software analysis was done to assess distal face and base, mesial face and base. Results: For the stainless-steel group, a statistically significant higher slot width was seen for 3M Unitek compared to Ormco and American Orthodontics (AO) slots with p<0.05. Concerning ceramic brackets, higher slot width was seen for American Orthodontics (AO) slots compared to 3M Unitek and Ormco ceramic brackets. This difference was statistically significant with p<0.05.  Conclusion: The present study concludes that inaccuracies in dimensions are seen owing to the existing difference between measured values and stated values. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Silver M, Griffin AC Jr, Azzopardi L, Masoud MI, Tokede O, Griffin AC 3rd. Novel methods reveal that parallelism contributes to the functional vertical slot dimension in ceramic and metal brackets. Angle Orthod 2018;88:812-8.

Eliades T. Orthodontic materials research and applications: part 2. Current status and projected future developments in materials and biocompatibility. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:253-62.

Bennett JC. Fundamentals of orthodontic bracket selection: a user guide. 2nd ed. London: Le Grande Publishing; 2010.

Brown P, Wagner W, Choi H. Orthodontic bracket slot dimensions as measured from entire bracket series. Angle Orthod 2015;85:678‑82.

Tangri K, Kumar P, Sharma P, Kumar K. A comparison of the accuracy of 0.022 slots at face, base, and the mesial and distal surface of brackets marketed by different manufacturers. J Ind Orthod Soc 2012;46:132‑6.

Pai VS, Pai SS, Krishna S, Swetha M. Evaluation of slot size in orthodontic brackets: Ar standards as expected? J Ind Orthod Soc 2011;45:169‑74.

Major TW, Carey JP, Nobes DS, Major PW. Orthodontic bracket manufacturing tolerances and dimensional differences between select self‑ligating brackets. J Dent Biomech 2010;2010:1‑6.

Bhalla NB, Good SA, McDonald F, Sherriff M, Cash AC. Assessment of slot sizes in self‑ligating brackets using electron microscopy. Aust Orthod J 2010;26:38‑41.

McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC. Evolution of treatment mechanics and contemporary appliance design in orthodontics: a 40-year perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;147:654-62.

Published

31-07-2021

How to Cite

Barbi, W., Rangari, P., Chhabada, A. K., & Katiyar, S. (2021). Comparative assessment of the accuracy of ceramic orthodontic brackets to 0.022-inch stainless steel slots in orthodontic patients. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(S1), 473–479. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5nS1.7457

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles