Assessment of commercially available bone graft material in the implant placed socket to enhance the osteointegration

Akhilesh Singh Parate; Malav Sheth; Afreen Wahab; Praveen Gangadharappa; Pratik Prakash Bumb; Srinivas Ganti

doi:10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.9011

Authors

Akhilesh Singh Parate
drakhileshortho@gmail.com
Senior resident, Department of Dentistry, Government medical College, Shahdol (MP)
Malav Sheth MDS, Senior Lecturer/Tutor, Department of Periodontics, Government dental college & hospital, Jamnagar
Afreen Wahab post graduate student, Dept. Of Orthodontics and dentofacial orthopaedics, School of dental sciences, Karad, Maharashtra
Praveen Gangadharappa M.D.S., Asst Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Jazan University-College of Dentistry, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
Pratik Prakash Bumb Postgraduate, Dept. of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College and Research Centre, Moradabad. (U.P)
Srinivas Ganti Professor & Head , Department of oral and Maxillofacial surgery, KIMS Dental college & Hospital, Amalapuram. (A.P)

Keywords:

concentrated growth factor, bone graft, implant

Abstract

Background: Alveolar bone resorption occurs in the majority of patients following teeth extraction. The present study was conducted to assess commercially available bone graft material in the implant placed socket to enhance the osteointegration. Materials & Methods: The present study comprised of 64 patients of both genders. Concentrated growth factor (CGF) was prepared according to Sacco’s protocol, using the patients’ own venous blood. Extraction of mandibular first molars was carried out and implants were immediately placed with CGF grafting. A Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) was taken immediately after implant placement and after six months of undisturbed healing to assess the quantity and quality of new bone formed around implants. Results: Out of 64 patients, males were 40 and females were 24. The mean bone height was on buccal side immediately was 9.04 and after 6 months was 11.3, on lingual side immediately was 10.6 and after 6 months was 11.8, on distal side immediately was 8.3 and after 6 months was 11.0, on mesial side immediately was 7.5 and after 6 months was 11.2. The difference was significant (P< 0.05).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Krebs M, Schmenger K, Neumann K, Weigl P, Moser W, Nentwig GH. Longterm evaluation of ANKYLOS® dental implants. Part 1: 20-year life table analysis of a longitudinal study of more than 12,500 implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015 Jan; 17(1): 275-86.

Lazzara RJ. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: Surgical and restorative advantages. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1989; 9: 332–343.

Albrektsson T, Lekholm U. Osseointegration: Current state of art. Dent Clin North Am 1989;33(4):537-54.

Schwartz–Arad D, Chaushu G. The ways and wherefores of immediate placement implants into fresh extraction sites: a literature review. J Periodontol 1997 Oct;68(10):915-23.

Grunder U, Polizzi G, Geone R, et al. A 3-year prospective multicentre followup report on immediate and delayed immediate placement of implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14:210-16.

Lanza A, Scognamiglio F, De Marco G, Di Francesco F, Femiano F, Lanza M, Itro A. Early implant placement: 3D radiographic study on the fate of buccal wall. J Osseointegr 2017;9(3):276-281.

Ericsson I, Nilson H, Lindh T, Nilner K, Randow K. Immediate functional loading of Brånemark single tooth implants. An 18-month clinical pilot follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 26–33.

Becker BE, Becker W, Ricci A, Geurs N. A prospective clinical trial of endoosseous screw shaped implant placed at the time of tooth extraction without augmentation. J Periodontol 1998; 69:920-26.

Wilson TG, Schenk R, Cochran D. Implants placed in fresh extraction site: A report of histological and histometric analysis of human biopsies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; E3: 333-41.

Gelb DA. Immediate implant surgery: Three-year retro-spective evaluation of 50 consecutive case. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993; 8:388-99.

Manoj S, Punit J, Chethan H, Nivya J. A study to assess the bone formed around immediate postextraction implants grafted with Concentrated Growth Factor in the mandibular posterior region. Journal of Osseointegration. 2018 Nov 14;10(4):121-9.

Jun SH, Park CJ, Hwang SH, Lee YK, Zhou C, Jang HS, Ryu JJ. The influence of bone graft procedures on primary stability and bone change of implants placed in fresh extraction sockets. Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2018 Dec;40(1):1-6.

Tehemar S, Hanes P, Sharawy M. Enhancement of osseointegration of implants placed into extraction sockets of healthy and periodontally diseased teeth by using graft material, an ePTFE membrane, or a combination. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2003 Oct;5(3):193-211.

Widana, I.K., Sumetri, N.W., Sutapa, I.K., Suryasa, W. (2021). Anthropometric measures for better cardiovascular and musculoskeletal health. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(3), 550–561. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22202

Rinartha, K., Suryasa, W., & Kartika, L. G. S. (2018). Comparative Analysis of String Similarity on Dynamic Query Suggestions. In 2018 Electrical Power, Electronics, Communications, Controls and Informatics Seminar (EECCIS) (pp. 399-404). IEEE.