Analysis of the model of integrated utilities network provision and infrastructure in Denpasar City

Made Sudiarsa; I Wayan Sudiasa; I Gede Sastra Wibawa; I Ketut Sutapa

doi:10.53730/ijpse.v7n2.14452

Authors

Made Sudiarsa
sudiarsa@pnb.ac.id
Bali State Polytechnic, Denpasar, Indonesia
I Wayan Sudiasa Bali State Polytechnic, Denpasar, Indonesia
I Gede Sastra Wibawa Bali State Polytechnic, Denpasar, Indonesia
I Ketut Sutapa Bali State Polytechnic, Denpasar, Indonesia

Keywords:

infrastructure, integrated, model, network, utilities

Abstract

The utility network serves as a crucial support system for fulfilling the various needs of a city, encompassing cable and pipe networks for electricity, clean water, waste management, telecommunications, and other essential services. However, the installation of utility networks has often been lacking in coordination, resulting in frequent disassembly and reinstallation. Given these circumstances, the objective of this research is to provide valuable insights and ideas to the government regarding the model of Integrated Utility Network Facilities, along with effective implementation methods and accurate construction cost estimation. This will be done while considering the presence of existing facilities and infrastructure. The research employed a quantitative descriptive method, utilizing a case study approach focusing on several roads in the city center as a pilot project. The objective of implementing integrated utility networks and infrastructure (ducting utilities) in Denpasar City is to establish coordination among agencies responsible for underground network utilities. The goals include maintaining a neat, orderly, and clean city environment, facilitating easier and more cost-effective network maintenance, avoiding damage or interference caused by third-party works, enabling information sharing in the event of network damages, and promoting environmental friendliness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arsyad, L. (2004). Ekonomi Pembangunan dan Perencanaan Pembangunan. Edisi Keempat. STIE YKPN. Yogyakarta.

Chu, I., Woo, S. K., Woo, S. I., Kim, J., & Lee, K. (2021). Analysis of Vertical Earth Pressure Acting on Box Culverts through Centrifuge Model Test. Applied Sciences, 12(1), 81.

Döner, F., Thompson, R., Stoter, J., Lemmen, C., Ploeger, H., van Oosterom, P., & Zlatanova, S. (2010). 4D cadastres: First analysis of legal, organizational, and technical impact—With a case study on utility networks. Land use policy, 27(4), 1068-1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.02.003

Gámez, M. R., Pérez, A. V., Arauz, W. M. S., & Jurado, W. C. C. (2016). Sustainable transformation of energy matrix. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT and Scientific Research, 2(9), 37-43.

Grigg, N., & Darrel, F. G. (2000). Infrastructure System Management & Optimization. In Internasional Seminar “Paradigm & Strategy of Infrastructure Management” Civil Engeenering Departement Dipononegoro University.

Hwangbo, S., Heo, S., & Yoo, C. (2022). Development of deterministic-stochastic model to integrate variable renewable energy-driven electricity and large-scale utility networks: Towards decarbonization petrochemical industry. Energy, 238, 122006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122006

Hwangbo, S., Lee, I. B., & Han, J. (2017). Mathematical model to optimize design of integrated utility supply network and future global hydrogen supply network under demand uncertainty. Applied Energy, 195, 257-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.041

Hwangbo, S., Lee, S., & Yoo, C. (2017). Optimal network design of hydrogen production by integrated utility and biogas supply networks. Applied energy, 208, 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.051

Kim, S. H., Yoon, S. G., Chae, S. H., & Park, S. (2010). Economic and environmental optimization of a multi-site utility network for an industrial complex. Journal of environmental management, 91(3), 690-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.033

Laistner, A., & Laistner, H. (2012). Utility Tunnels–Proven Sustainability Above and Below Ground. na.

Mavromatis, S. P., & Kokossis, A. C. (1998). Conceptual optimisation of utility networks for operational variations—I. Targets and level optimisation. Chemical Engineering Science, 53(8), 1585-1608. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(97)00431-4

Munikoti, S., Lai, K., & Natarajan, B. (2021). Robustness assessment of hetero-functional graph theory based model of interdependent urban utility networks. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 212, 107627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107627

Newbery, D. M. (1997). Privatisation and liberalisation of network utilities. European Economic Review, 41(3-5), 357-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00010-X

Rahmat, A., Syakhrani, A. W., & Satria, E. (2021). Promising online learning and teaching in digital age: Systematic review analysis. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT and Scientific Research, 7(4), 126-135.

Sărăcin, A. (2017). Using georadar systems for mapping underground utility networks. Procedia Engineering, 209, 216-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.150

Sari, S. K. P., & Rudiarto, I. (2018). Kajian Pelaksanaan Penyediaan Utilitas Umum Perkotaan Terpadu Kabupaten Temanggung. Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota, 14(2), 123-130.

Shi, L., Liu, C., & Liu, B. (2008). Network utility maximization for triple-play services. Computer communications, 31(10), 2257-2269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2008.02.016

Suprayitno, H., & Soemitro, R. A. A. (2018). Preliminary Reflexion on Basic Principle of Infrastructure Asset Management. Jurnal Manajemen Aset Infrastruktur & Fasilitas, 2(1).