Learning models and authentic assessment on football skill learning achievement
Keywords:
authentic assessment, football skills, learning achievement, motor educability, teaching modelAbstract
The current study was aimed at finding the effect of teaching models and an authentic assessment on football skill learning achievement by controlling motor educability. The sample consisted of 142 students of Physical Education Health Department that were selected randomly. The study used the 2x2 factorial experimental design, while the data were analyzed using 2-way ANACOVA. The results showed that after controlling motor educability, football skill learning achievement of the students who learned through the Cooperative Learning type Jigsaw model was higher than those who learned through the conventional model; the football skill learning achievement of those who were assessed by portfolio assessment was better than those who were assessed by authentic assessment. There was also an interaction between the teaching model and an authentic assessment on football skill learning achievement. The students who learned through the Cooperative Learning type jigsaw model was more appropriately assessed by portfolio assessment, while those who learned through the conventional learning model was more appropriately assessed by performance assessment.
Downloads
References
Baumgartner, T. A., & Jackson, A. S. (1998). Measurement for evaluation in physical education and exercise science (No. Ed. 6). WCB/McGraw-Hill. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19991800395
Butler, S. M., & McMunn, N. D. (2006). A Teacher's Guide to Classroom Assessment: Understanding and Using Assessment to Improve Student Learning. Jossey-Bass, An Imprint of Wiley. 10475 Crosspoint Blvd, Indianapolis, IN 46256. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED493644
Danielson, C., & Dragoon, J. (2013). A Collection of Performance Tasks & Rubrics: Upper Elementary Mathematics. Routledge. https://content.taylorfrancis.com/books/download?dac=C2013-0-20689-9&isbn=9781317920847&format=googlePreviewPdf
Dantes, N. (2012). Metode Penelitian, Yogyakarta; CV. Andi Offset.
Elliott, S. N. (1994). Creating Meaningful Performance Assessments: Fundamental Concepts. Performance Assessment: CEC Mini-Library. Council for Exceptional Children, 1920 Association Dr., Reston, VA 22091-1589. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED375566
Grace, J. K., Yates III, J. R., & Tome, C. I. M. (1996). Termite-resistant construction: use of a stainless steel mesh to exclude Coptotermes formosanus. Sociobiology, 28(3), 365-372. https://www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/gracek/pdfs/110.pdf
Gronlund, N. E. (1982). Constructing achievement tests. Prentice Hall.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. http://www.academia.edu/download/33787421/Cooperative_Learning_Methods_A_Meta-Analysis.pdf
Kirkendall, D. R., Gruber, J. J., & Johnson, R. E. (1987). Measurement and evaluation for physical educators.
Kunandar, D. (2013). Penilaian Autentik (Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013).
Lerner, J. W. (1976). Children with learning disabilities: theories, diagnosis, teaching strategies. Houghton Mifflin School.
Marhaeni, A. A. I. N. (2004). Portofolio Dalam Pembelajaran Suatu Pendekatan Asesmen Berbasis Kompetensi. Makalah. Singaraja: IKIP Negeri Singaraja.
Mielke, D. (2007). Dasar-dasar sepak bola. Bandung: Pakar Raya.
Nitko, A. J. (2001). Conceptual Frameworks to Accommodate the Validation of Rapidly Changing Requirements for Assessments. Curriculum and assessment, 143. http://repository.stkipgetsempena.ac.id/bitstream/565/1/Curriculum_and_Assessment.pdf#page=151
Nur, M. (2011). Model Pengajaran Langsung. Surabaya: Pusat Sains dan Matematika Sekolah Unesa.
Pett, J. (1990). What is authentic evaluation? Common questions and answers. FairTest Examiner, 4, 8-9.
Putri, R., & Indra, I. (2010). Pengaruh pendekatan pembelajaran dan bentuk tes formatif terhadap hasil belajar matematika dengan mengontrol ?ntelegensi siswa sd di Palembang [The effect of learning approach dan formative test to mathematic learning outcome: Study in Palembang public elementary student](Postgraduate dissertation, Jakarta State University, Indonesia) (Doctoral dissertation, Tesis Universitas Negeri Jakarta).
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative Learning: Theory. Research and Practice.(2nd ed.) Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Slavin, R. E. (2009). Cooperative learning: teori, riset, dan praktik.(terjemahan Lita). Bandung: Nusa Media.
Sucipto, Bambang Sutiyono, Indra, M. Thohir, and Nuryadi. (2000) Sepakbola Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Sudjana, N. (1999). Nana, Penilaian Hasil Belajar Mengajar.
Suharta, G. & Ardana, M. (2006) “Jenis-Jenis Model Pembelajaran,” Paper presented in Penataran Dosen Muda Pola 90 Jam, Singaraja, 3 September 2006.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Articles published in the International Journal of Physical Sciences and Engineering (IJPSE) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJPSE right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJPSE can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJPSE volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
