N-Acetyl Cysteine in combination with vancomycin or linezolid for biofilm eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS9.12535

Authors

  • Eny Purwoningsih Clinical Microbiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University, RSUD dr. Soetomo Surabaya, Indonesia
  • M. Vitanata Arfijanto Internal Medicine Department Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University, RSUD dr. Soetomo Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Agung Dwi Wahyu Widodo Clinical Microbiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University, RSUD dr. Soetomo Surabaya, Indonesia

Keywords:

biofilm, eradication, MRSA

Abstract

Antibiotics are challenging to deliver because MRSA can build biofilms. In Indonesia, the major parenteral antibiotics for treating MRSA infections are Vancomycin and Linezolid. Because NAC can degrade the biofilm matrix, it is believed that combining it with antibiotics will improve its capacity to destroy MRSA biofilms. An experiment was done at RSUD Dr. Soetomo Surabaya's Clinical Microbiology Laboratory in June 2022. The biofilm-forming bacteria studied were MRSA clinical isolates. The antibiotics utilized were Vancomycin (2 g/mL), Linezolid (4 g/mL), and NAC (8 mg/mL). A biofilm assay microtiter test was also carried out to see how drug exposure affected the biofilm that had grown. Biofilm eradication was observed when comparing the mass yield and biofilm metabolism after treatment to the control. According to the study's findings, using a combination of NAC with Vancomycin or Linezolid was superior to using NAC, Vancomycin, or Linezolid alone. There was no apparent difference between the two combinations, however. The combination of NAC and Vancomycin had the same effect on eliminating MRSA biofilms as the combination of NAC and Linezolid.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bal AM, David MZ, Garau J, Gottlieb T, Mazzei T, Scaglione F, et al.(2017). Future trends in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection: An in-depth review of newer antibiotics active against an enduring pathogen. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 10:295–303

CLSI. (2021). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 31st ed. CLSI supplement M100. Informational Supplement M100-S31. Vol. 8, Journal of Services Marketing. 1–352 p.

Cedeño-Roldán, M. A., & Reyes-Meza, O. B. (2022). Psychomotor development and motor skills in learning in children from 1 to 3 years old. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 9(4), 560-568. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v9n4.2123

Doulgeraki AI, Di Ciccio P, Ianieri A, Nychas GJE. (2017). Methicillin-resistant food-related Staphylococcus aureus: a review of current knowledge and biofilm formation for future studies and applications. Res Microbiol 168(1):1–15

Halim RMA, Kassem NN, Mahmoud BS.(2018). Detection of biofilm producing staphylococci among different clinical isolates and its relation to methicillin susceptibility. Maced J Med Sci. 2018;6(8):133541.

Haney EF, Trimble MJ, Hancock R. (2021). Microtiter plate assay to asses antibiofilm activity against bacteria. Nature protocols; vol.16; May 2021; 2615-2632

Hashemian SMR, Farhadi T, Ganjparvar M. (2018). Linezolid: A review of its properties, function, and use in critical care. Drug Des Devel Ther.;12:1759

Kato H, Hagihara M, Asai N, Shibata Y, Koizumi Y, Yamagishi Y, et al.(2021). Meta-analysis of vancomycin versus linezolid in pneumonia with proven methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 24:98–105

Lowy FD. Antimicrobial resistance: The example of Staphylococcus aureus.(2003).

J Clin Invest.111(9):1265–73

Merta, I. N., & Suderana, I. W. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic handling community social and cultural sector stimulus efforts. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v4n3.434

Mukherjee R, Priyadarshini A, Pandey RP, Raj VS. (2021).Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

Leite B, Gomes F, Melo P, Souza C, Teixeira P, Oliveira R, et al. (2013). N-acetylcysteine and Vancomycin alone and in combination against staphylococci biofilm. Rev Bras Eng Biomed. 2013;29(2):184–92.

Leite B, Gomes F, Teixeira P, Souza C, Pizzolitto E, Oliveira R.(2013). Combined effect of Linezolid and N-acetylcysteine against Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2013 Dec;31(10):655-9.

Lee AS, De Lencastre H, Garau J, Kluytmans J, Malhotra-Kumar S, Peschel A, et al.(2018). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Rev Dis Prim 4(May):1–23.

Li J, Zhao QH, Huang KC, Li ZQ, Zhang LY, Qin DY, et al.(2017). Linezolid vs. Vancomycin in treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: a meta-analysis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci.21(17):3974–9

Li X, Kim J, Wu J, Ahamed AI, Wang Y, Martins-Green M. (2020). N -Acetyl-cysteine and Mechanisms Involved in Resolution of Chronic Wound Biofilm. J Diabetes Res. 2020;2020.

Liaqat I. (2019). Biofilm Formation, Maturation and Prevention: A Review. J Bacteriol Mycol.6(1):4–7.

Rabin N, Zheng Y, Temeng CO , Du Y , Bonsu E , Sintim HO.(2015). Biofilm formation mechanisms and targets for developing antibiofilm agents. Future Med Chem 7(4):493-512

Rahimi F, Katouli M, Karimi S. (2016). Biofilm production among methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from catheterized patients with urinary tract infection. Microb Pathog 98:69–76

Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2021). Get vaccinated when it is your turn and follow the local guidelines. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(3), x-xv. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5n3.2938

Yu M, Chua SL. (2020). Demolishing the great wall of biofilms in Gram-negative bacteria: To disrupt or disperse? Med Res Rev.40(3):1103–16.

Published

06-09-2022

How to Cite

Purwoningsih, E., Arfijanto, M. V., & Widodo, A. D. W. (2022). N-Acetyl Cysteine in combination with vancomycin or linezolid for biofilm eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S9), 803–810. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS9.12535

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles