Laboratory information systems: Enhancing efficiency and patient care
Keywords:
Laboratory Communication Management, Laboratory Test Request, Laboratory Test Result, Exchange Of Laboratory Information, Interchange Of Health Information, Outpatient Care CentersAbstract
Background _ Laboratory services are an integral part of the decision-making process for physicians, especially in ambulatory care settings, where timely and accurate laboratory results are crucial for effective medical treatment. Communication errors commonly occur when information is shared on paper, which can adversely affect patient outcomes and operational efficiency. The advent of electronic communication systems presents an opportunity to enhance this communication between ambulatory care facilities and laboratories. Aim of Work – The aim of this review was to analyze research conducted on the impact of electronic communication between ambulatory care facilities and laboratories. The review sought to assess the benefits and implications of transitioning from traditional paper-based communication methods to electronic interfaces in laboratory services. Methods –A comprehensive search was performed across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science, to identify relevant studies. Inclusion criteria were set to focus on studies published in English between the years 2000 and 2021, and only those with accessible full texts were selected.
Downloads
References
- Oral B, Cullen RM, Diaz DL, Hod EA, Kratz A. Downtime procedures for the 21st century: using a fully integrated health record for uninterrupted electronic reporting of laboratory results during laboratory information system downtimes. Am J Clin Pathol. 2015;143(1):100–4.
- The Lewin Group. The value of laboratory screening and diagnostic tests for prevention and health care improvement. Falls Church, VA: The Lewin Group; 2009.
- Carter JY, Lema OE, Wangai MW, Munafu CG, Rees PH, Nyamongo JA. Laboratory testing improves diagnosis and treatment outcomes in primary health care facilities. Afr J Lab Med. 2012;1(1):8.
- Noren J, Frazier T, Altman I, DeLozier J. Ambulatory medical care: a comparison of internists and family-general practitioners. N Engl J Med. 1980;302(1):11–16.
- Crawford JM, Shotorbani K, Sharma G, et al. Improving American healthcare through “Clinical Lab 2.0”: a project Santa Fe report. Acad Pathol. 2017;4:2374289517701067.
- Elder NC, McEwen TR, Flach JM, Gallimore JJ. Management of test results in family medicine offices. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(4):343–351.
- Elder NC, McEwen TR, Flach J, Gallimore J, Pallerla H. The management of test results in primary care: does an electronic medical record make a difference? Fam Med. 2010;42(5):327–333.
- Seyyedi N, Moghaddasi H, Asadi F, Hamidpour M, Shoaie K. The Effect of Information Technology on the Information Exchange between Laboratories and Ambulatory Care Centers: A Systematic Review. Laboratory Medicine. 2020 Jul 8;51(4):430-40.
- Lawton P, Ingraham J, Blickensderfer B. Best Practices for Reducing Interface Errors in Electronic Medical Records. InProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2021 Sep (Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 904-907). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
- Kern LM, Barrón Y, Blair AJ III, et al. Electronic result viewing and quality of care in small group practices. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(4):405–410.
- Ramaiah M, Subrahmanian E, Sriram RD, Lide BB. Workflow and electronic health records in small medical practices. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2012;9:1d.
- Akhlaq A, McKinstry B, Muhammad KB, Sheikh A. Barriers and facilitators to health information exchange in low- and middle-income country settings: a systematic review. Health Policy Plan. 2016;31(9):1310–1325.
- Yi M. Major issues in adoption of electronic health records. J Digit Inf Manag. 2018;16(4):180–191.
- Gambo I, Oluwagbemi O, Achimugu P. Lack of interoperable health information systems in developing countries: an impact analysis. J Health Inform Dev Ctries. 2011;5(1):185–196.
- Koske V. Challenges Faced by The Public Health Facilities in Adopting Electronic Medical Records in Kenya a Case of Mama Lucy Kibaki Hospital (Doctoral dissertation, Daystar University, School of Human and Social Sciences). 2021.
- Vecellio E, Malley MW, Toouli G, Georgiou A, Westbrook JI. Data quality associated with handwritten laboratory test requests: classification and frequency of data-entry errors for outpatient serology tests. Health Inf Manag. 2015;44(3):7–12.
- Henricks WH. “Meaningful use” of electronic health records and its relevance to laboratories and pathologists. J Pathol Inform. 2011;2:7.
- Lehmann CU, O’Connor KG, Shorte VA, Johnson TD. Use of electronic health record systems by office-based pediatricians. Pediatrics. 2015;135(1):e7–e15.
- Reisman M. EHRs: the challenge of making electronic data usable and interoperable. P T. 2017;42(9):572–575.
- Beckwith BA, Aller RD, Brassel JH, Brodsky VB, de Baca ME. Laboratory interoperability best practices: ten mistakes to avoid. Northfield, IL: College of American Pathologists; 2013.
- Lubin IM, Astles JR, Shahangian S, Madison B, Parry R, Schmidt RL, Rubinstein ML. Bringing the clinical laboratory into the strategy to advance diagnostic excellence. diagnosis. 2021 Aug 26;8(3):281-94.
- Singh H, Thomas EJ, Sittig DF, et al. Notification of abnormal lab test results in an electronic medical record: do any safety concerns remain? Am J Med. 2010;123(3):238–244.
- Singh H, Wilson L, Petersen LA, et al. Improving follow-up of abnormal cancer screens using electronic health records: trust but verify test result communication. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009;9:49.
- Ross SE, Radcliff TA, Leblanc WG, Dickinson LM, Libby AM, Nease DE Jr. Effects of health information exchange adoption on ambulatory testing rates. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20(6):1137–1142.
- Walker J, Pan E, Johnston D, Adler-Milstein J, Bates DW, Middleton B. The value of health care information exchange and interoperability. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-10–W5-18.
- Downs SM, van Dyck PC, Rinaldo P, et al. Improving newborn screening laboratory test ordering and result reporting using health information exchange. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17(1):13–18.
- Bell DS, Cima L, Seiden DS, Nakazono TT, Alcouloumre MS, Cunningham WE. Effects of laboratory data exchange in the care of patients with HIV. Int J Med Inform. 2012;81(10):e74–e82.
- Gascón F, Herrera I, Vázquez C, et al. Electronic health record: design and implementation of a lab test request module. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82(6):514–521.
- Zhou Y, Ancker JS, Upadhye M, et al. The impact of interoperability of electronic health records on ambulatory physician practices: a discrete-event simulation study. Inform Prim Care. 2013;21(1):21–29.
- Al Saleem N, El Metwally A, Househ MS. Electronic lab information exchange (ELIE) in Saudi Arabia. In: Mantas J, Househ MS, Hasman A, eds. Integrating Information Technology and Management for Quality of Care. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: IOS Press; 2014:134–137.
- Wilkerson ML, Henricks WH, Castellani WJ, Whitsitt MS, Sinard JH. Management of laboratory data and information exchange in the electronic health record. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015;139(3):319–327.
- Cunningham WE, Ford CL, Kinsler JJ, et al. Effects of a laboratory health information exchange intervention on antiretroviral therapy use, viral suppression, and racial/ethnic disparities. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;75(3):290–298.
- Raymond L, Paré G, Maillet É, Ortiz de Guinea A, Trudel MC, Marsan J. Improving performance in the ED through laboratory information exchange systems. Int J Emerg Med. 2018;11(1):15.
- Blaya JA, Shin SS, Yale G, et al. Electronic laboratory system reduces errors in National Tuberculosis Program: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010;14(8):1009–1015.
- Frisse ME, Johnson KB, Nian H, et al. The financial impact of health information exchange on emergency department care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19(3):328–333.
- Kern LM, Barrón Y, Dhopeshwarkar RV, Kaushal R. Health information exchange and ambulatory quality of care. Appl Clin Inform. 2012;3(2):197–209.
- Blaya JA, Shin SS, Yagui M, et al. Reducing communication delays and improving quality of care with a tuberculosis laboratory information system in resource poor environments: a cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e90110.
- Salinas M, López-Garrigós M, Flores E, Leiva-Salinas M, Ahumada M, Leiva-Salinas C. Education and communication is the key for the successful management of vitamin D test requesting. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015;25(2):237–241.
- Litchfield I, Bentham L, Lilford R, McManus RJ, Hill A, Greenfield S. Test result communication in primary care: a survey of current practice. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(11):691–699.
- Meyer R, Lovis C. Interoperability in hospital information systems: a return-on-investment study comparing CPOE with and without laboratory integration. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:320–324.
- Dullabh P, Moiduddin A. White paper: Electronic exchange of clinical laboratory: information issues and opportunities. Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2008.
- Wu H, LaRue EM. Linking the health data system in the U.S.: Challenges to the benefits. Int J Nurs Sci. 2017;4(4):410–417.
- Fontaine P, Ross SE, Zink T, Schilling LM. Systematic review of health information exchange in primary care practices. J Am Board Fam Med. 2010;23(5):655–670.
- Fontaine P, Zink T, Boyle RG, Kralewski J. Health information exchange: participation by Minnesota primary care practices. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(7):622–629.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
