Use of Virtual Reality (VR) for medical training
Applications at different medical departments
Keywords:
Virtual Reality, medical training, simulation, healthcare education, immersive learning, cost efficiency, user engagementAbstract
Background: The rapid evolution of medical practice necessitates innovative training methods to keep pace with the demands of modern healthcare. Traditional education methods are increasingly complemented by simulation-based approaches, which provide practical and clinically relevant experiences. Virtual Reality (VR) has emerged as a significant tool in this realm, offering immersive, interactive training environments that aim to enhance learning outcomes. Aim: This paper explores the application of VR across various medical departments, including emergency medicine, health information management, nursing, and pharmacy. It examines VR's effectiveness in providing experiential learning, its advantages over traditional methods, and the challenges associated with its implementation. Methods: The study involves a comprehensive review of current literature and practical implementations of VR in medical training. It assesses the benefits and limitations of VR, evaluates evidence supporting its use, and discusses its applications in different medical fields. Key metrics include knowledge gain, cost efficiency, and user engagement. Results: VR offers distinct advantages such as immersive learning experiences, repeatable practice opportunities, and cost-effective simulation solutions. It simplifies access to clinical training, supports flexible learning schedules, and fosters engagement through gamification.
Downloads
References
McGaghie, W. C., Issenberg, S. B., Petrusa, E. R., & Scalese, R. J. (2010). A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009. Medical Education, 44(1), 50-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x
Bailenson, J. N. (2018). Experience on demand: What virtual reality is, how it works, and what it can do. WW Norton & Company.
Makowski, D., Sperduti, M., Nicolas, S., & Piolino, P. (2017). ‘Being there’ and remembering it: Presence improves memory encoding. Consciousness and Cognition, 53, 194-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.06.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.06.015
Gutiérrez, F., Pierce, J., Vergara, V. M., et al. (2007). The effect of degree of immersion upon learning performance in virtual reality simulations for medical education. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 125, 155-160. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-878-5-155
Issenberg, S. B., McGaghie, W. C., Petrusa, E. R., Lee Gordon, D., & Scalese, R. J. (2005). Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher, 27(1), 10-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590400006319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500046924
Walsh, K., & Jaye, P. (2013). Simulation-based medical education: Cost measurement must be comprehensive. Surgery, 153(2), 302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2012.10.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2012.10.020
Zendejas, B. (2013). Cost: The missing outcome in simulation-based medical education research: A systematic review. Surgery, 153(2), 160-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2012.06.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2012.06.025
McIntish, C. (2006). Simulation: What does it really cost? Simulation in Healthcare, 1(2), 109. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.SIH.0000246446.59482.67 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01266021-200600120-00041
Iglesias-Vázquez, J. (2007). Cost-efficiency assessment of Advanced Life Support (ALS) courses based on the comparison of advanced simulators with conventional manikins. BMC Emergency Medicine, 7(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-7-18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-7-18
Repetto, C., Serino, S., Macedonia, M., & Riva, G. (2016). Virtual reality as an embodied tool to enhance episodic memory in elderly. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1839. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01839 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01839
Vozenilek, J., Huff, J. S., Reznek, M., & Gordon, J. A. (2004). See one, do one, teach one: Advanced technology in medical education. Academic Emergency Medicine, 11(11), 1149-1154. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2004.06.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.003
Levin, A. (2004). Fewer crashes caused by pilots. USA Today. http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2004-03-01-crash_x.htm
Bric, J. D., Lumbard, D. C., Frelich, M. J., et al. (2016). Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: A review. Surgical Endoscopy, 30(5), 2169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4330-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4517-y
Maytin, M., Daily, T. P., & Carillo, R. G. (2015). Virtual reality lead extraction as a method for training new physicians: A pilot study. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 38(3), 319-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.12512 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.12546
Creutzfeldt, J., Hedman, L., & Felländer-Tsai, L. (2016). Cardiopulmonary resuscitation training by avatars: A qualitative study of medical students’ experiences using a multiplayer virtual world. JMIR Serious Games, 4(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.2196/games.5235 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/games.6448
Real, F. J., DeBlasio, D., Beck, A. F., et al. (2017). A virtual reality curriculum for pediatric residents decreases rates of influenza vaccine refusal. Academic Pediatrics, 17(4), 431-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2017.01.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2017.01.010
Burke, S. M. (2017). Cultivating critical thinking using virtual interactive case studies. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 33(1), 94-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2017.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2016.12.001
Harrington, C. M., Kavanagh, D. O., Quinlan, J. F., et al. (2018). Development and evaluation of a trauma decision-making simulator in Oculus virtual reality. American Journal of Surgery, 215(1), 42-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.08.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.02.011
Haerling, K. A. (2018). Cost-utility analysis of virtual and mannequin-based simulation. Simulation in Healthcare, 13(1), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000280
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2019 International journal of health sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
