The role of health administration technicians in public health policy implementation

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v4nS1.15278

Authors

  • Abdullah lbrahim Alsulaiman KSA, National Guard Health Affairs
  • Khalid Ali Almzairie KSA, National Guard Health Affairs
  • Muteb Saeed Saud Alharbi KSA, National Guard Health Affairs
  • Omar Hussain Alsomali KSA, National Guard Health Affairs

Keywords:

health administration technicians, public health policy, implementation outcomes, quantitative measures, systematic review

Abstract

Background: Effective public health policy implementation is crucial for improving population health outcomes; however, existing research in dissemination and implementation (D&I) science has largely overlooked the role of health administration technicians in this process. Despite the impact of policies on health, studies examining the execution of such policies are limited. Aim: This review seeks to identify and evaluate quantitative measures used to assess health policy implementation outcomes and determinants, filling a significant gap in the current literature. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, utilizing various academic databases to gather empirical studies that evaluated public health policy implementation from 1995 to 2019. The review analyzed 70 measures of implementation outcomes and determinants, focusing on their psychometric and pragmatic quality. Results: The analysis revealed that fidelity/compliance and acceptability were the most frequently assessed implementation outcomes, while readiness for implementation was the most common determinant. Only a small number of measures assessed cost implications, indicating a potential area for further research. Conclusion: Findings underscore the need for robust quantitative measures to accurately assess health policy implementation. The systematic review contributes to understanding how health administration technicians can effectively support policy execution, enhancing overall public health outcomes. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Purtle J, Dodson EA, Brownson RC. Policy dissemination research. In: Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, editors. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice, Second Edition. New York: Oxford University Press; 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190683214.003.0026

Brownson RC, Baker EA, Deshpande AD, Gillespie KN. Evidence-based public health. Third ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2018.

Preparedness, E., & Prevention, V. The Community Preventive Services Task Force.

Eyler AA, Chriqui JF, Moreland-Russell S, Brownson RC, editors. Prevention, policy, and public health, first edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190224653.001.0001

Andre FE, Booy R, Bock HL, Clemens J, Datta SK, John TJ, et al. Vaccination greatly reduces disease, disability, death, and inequity worldwide. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2008 February 2008. Contract No.: 07-040089.

Cheng JJ, Schuster-Wallace CJ, Watt S, Newbold BK, Mente A. An ecological quantification of the relationships between water, sanitation and infant, child, and maternal mortality. Environ Health. 2012;11:4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-11-4

Levy DT, Li Y, Yuan Z. Impact of nations meeting the MPOWER targets between 2014 and 2016: an update. Tob Control. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054837

Purtle J, Peters R, Brownson RC. A review of policy dissemination and implementation research funded by the National Institutes of Health, 2007-2014. Implement Sci. 2016;11:1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0367-1

Lewis CC, Proctor EK, Brownson RC. Measurement issues in dissemination and implementation research. In: Brownson RC, Ga C, Proctor EK, editors. Disssemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice, Second Edition. New York: Oxford University Press; 2018.

Lewis CC, Fischer S, Weiner BJ, Stanick C, Kim M, Martinez RG. Outcomes for implementation science: an enhanced systematic review of instruments using evidence-based rating criteria. Implement Sci. 2015;10:155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0342-x

Lewis CC, Mettert KD, Dorsey CN, Martinez RG, Weiner BJ, Nolen E, et al. An updated protocol for a systematic review of implementation-related measures. Syst Rev. 2018;7(1):66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0728-3

Chaudoir SR, Dugan AG, Barr CH. Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: a systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures. Implement Sci. 2013;8:22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-22

Rabin BA, Lewis CC, Norton WE, Neta G, Chambers D, Tobin JN, et al. Measurement resources for dissemination and implementation research in health. Implement Sci. 2016;11:42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0401-y

Nilsen P, Stahl C, Roback K, Cairney P. Never the twain shall meet?--a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research. Implement Sci. 2013;8:63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-63

Sabatier PA, editor. Theories of the Policy Process. New York, NY: Routledge; 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367274689

Kingdon J. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, second edition. Second ed. New York: Longman; 1995.

Jones MD, Peterson HL, Pierce JJ, Herweg N, Bernal A, Lamberta Raney H, et al. A river runs through it: a multiple streams meta-review. Policy Stud J. 2016;44(1):13–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12115

Zahariadis, N. (2019). The multiple streams framework: Structure, limitations, prospects. In Theories of the policy process, second edition (pp. 65-92). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367274689-3

Howlett M, Mukherjee I, Woo JJ. From tools to toolkits in policy design studies: the new design orientation towards policy formulation research. Policy Polit. 2015;43(2):291–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/147084414X13992869118596

Natesan SD, Marathe RR. Literature review of public policy implementation. Int J Public Policy. 2015;11(4):219–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPP.2015.070550

Sabatier PA, Mazmanian. Implementation of public policy: a framework of analysis. Policy Studies Journal. 1980 (January). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1980.tb01266.x

Sabatier PA. Theories of the Policy Process. Westview; 2007.

Tomm-Bonde L, Schreiber RS, Allan DE, MacDonald M, Pauly B, Hancock T, et al. Fading vision: knowledge translation in the implementation of a public health policy intervention. Implement Sci. 2013;8:59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-59

Roll S, Moulton S, Sandfort J. A comparative analysis of two streams of implementation research. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs. 2017;3(1):3–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.3.1.3-22

Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Admin Pol Ment Health. 2011;38(2):65–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7

Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, editors. Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice, second edition. New York: Oxford University Press; 2018.

Tabak RG, Khoong EC, Chambers DA, Brownson RC. Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(3):337–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.024

Rabin BA, Brownson RC, Haire-Joshu D, Kreuter MW, Weaver NL. A glossary for dissemination and implementation research in health. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008;14(2):117–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PHH.0000311888.06252.bb

Lewis CC, Klasnja P, Powell BJ, Lyon AR, Tuzzio L, Jones S, et al. From classification to causality: advancing understanding of mechanisms of change in implementation science. Front Public Health. 2018;6:136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00136

Boyd MR, Powell BJ, Endicott D, Lewis CC. A method for tracking implementation strategies: an exemplar implementing measurement-based care in community behavioral health clinics. Behav Ther. 2018;49(4):525–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2017.11.012

Glasgow RE. What does it mean to be pragmatic? Pragmatic methods, measures, and models to facilitate research translation. Health Educ Behav. 2013;40(3):257–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198113486805

Glasgow RE, Riley WT. Pragmatic measures: what they are and why we need them. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45(2):237–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.010

Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50

Bullock HL. Understanding the implementation of evidence-informed policies and practices from a policy perspective: a critical interpretive synthesis in: How do systems achieve their goals? the role of implementation in mental health systems improvement [Dissertation]. Hamilton, Ontario: McMaster University; 2019.

Watson DP, Adams EL, Shue S, Coates H, McGuire A, Chesher J, et al. Defining the external implementation context: an integrative systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3046-5

McKibbon KA, Lokker C, Wilczynski NL, Ciliska D, Dobbins M, Davis DA, et al. A cross-sectional study of the number and frequency of terms used to refer to knowledge translation in a body of health literature in 2006: a Tower of Babel? Implement Sci. 2010;5:16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-16

Terwee CB, Jansma EP, Riphagen II, de Vet HC. Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(8):1115–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9528-5

Egan M, Maclean A, Sweeting H, Hunt K. Comparing the effectiveness of using generic and specific search terms in electronic databases to identify health outcomes for a systematic review: a prospective comparative study of literature search method. BMJ Open. 2012;2:3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001043

Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM. Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.

Covidence systematic review software. Melbourne, Australia: Veritas Health Innovation. https://www.covidence.org.

Powell BJ, Stanick CF, Halko HM, Dorsey CN, Weiner BJ, Barwick MA, et al. Toward criteria for pragmatic measurement in implementation research and practice: a stakeholder-driven approach using concept mapping. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0649-x

Stanick CF, Halko HM, Nolen EA, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Mettert KD, et al. Pragmatic measures for implementation research: development of the Psychometric and Pragmatic Evidence Rating Scale (PAPERS). Transl Behav Med. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibz164

Henrikson NB, Blasi PR, Dorsey CN, Mettert KD, Nguyen MB, Walsh-Bailey C, et al. Psychometric and pragmatic properties of social risk screening tools: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2019;57(6S1):S13–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.012

Stirman SW, Miller CJ, Toder K, Calloway A. Development of a framework and coding system for modifications and adaptations of evidence-based interventions. Implement Sci. 2013;8:65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-65

Lau AS, Brookman-Frazee L. The 4KEEPS study: identifying predictors of sustainment of multiple practices fiscally mandated in children’s mental health services. Implement Sci. 2016;11:1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0388-4

Ekvall G. Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European J Work Organizational Psychology. 1996;5(1):105–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13594329608414845

Lövgren G, Eriksson S, Sandman PO. Effects of an implemented care policy on patient and personnel experiences of care. Scand J Caring Sci. 2002;16(1):3–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-6712.2002.00038.x

Dwyer DJ, Ganster DC. The effects of job demands and control on employee attendance and satisfaction. J Organ Behav. 1991;12:595–608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030120704

Condon-Paoloni D, Yeatman HR, Grigonis-Deane E. Health-related claims on food labels in Australia: understanding environmental health officers’ roles and implications for policy. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18(1):81–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980013003078

Patterson MG, West MA, Shackleton VJ, Dawson JF, Lawthom R, Maitlis S, et al. Validating the organizational climate measure: links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation. J Organ Behav. 2005;26:279–408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.312

Glisson C, Green P, Williams NJ. Assessing the Organizational Social Context (OSC) of child welfare systems: implications for research and practice. Child Abuse Negl. 2012;36(9):621–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2012.06.002

Beidas RS, Aarons G, Barg F, Evans A, Hadley T, Hoagwood K, et al. Policy to implementation: evidence-based practice in community mental health--study protocol. Implement Sci. 2013;8(1):38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-38

Eisenberger R, Cummings J, Armeli S, Lynch P. Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. J Appl Psychol. 1997;82:812–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.82.5.812

Eby L, George K, Brown BL. Going tobacco-free: predictors of clinician reactions and outcomes of the NY state office of alcoholism and substance abuse services tobacco-free regulation. J Subst Abus Treat. 2013;44(3):280–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2012.07.014

Vogler S, Zimmermann N, de Joncheere K. Policy interventions related to medicines: survey of measures taken in European countries during 2010-2015. Health Policy. 2016;120(12):1363–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.09.006

Wanberg CRB, Banas JT. Predictors and outcomes of openness to change in a reorganizing workplace. J Applied Psychology. 2000;85:132–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.85.1.132

Hardy LJ, Wertheim P, Bohan K, Quezada JC, Henley E. A model for evaluating the activities of a coalition-based policy action group: the case of Hermosa Vida. Health Promot Pract. 2013;14(4):514–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839912461253

Gavriilidis G, Östergren P-O. Evaluating a traditional medicine policy in South Africa: phase 1 development of a policy assessment tool. Glob Health Action. 2012;5:17271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v5i0.17271

Hongoro C, Rutebemberwa E, Twalo T, Mwendera C, Douglas M, Mukuru M, et al. Analysis of selected policies towards universal health coverage in Uganda: the policy implementation barometer protocol. Archives Public Health. 2018;76:12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-018-0258-4

Roeseler A, Solomon M, Beatty C, Sipler AM. The tobacco control network’s policy readiness and stage of change assessment: what the results suggest for moving tobacco control efforts forward at the state and territorial levels. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016;22(1):9–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000247

Brämberg EB, Klinga C, Jensen I, Busch H, Bergström G, Brommels M, et al. Implementation of evidence-based rehabilitation for non-specific back pain and common mental health problems: a process evaluation of a nationwide initiative. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0740-4

Rütten A, Lüschen G, von Lengerke T, Abel T, Kannas L, Rodríguez Diaz JA, et al. Determinants of health policy impact: comparative results of a European policymaker study. Sozial-Und Praventivmedizin. 2003;48(6):379–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-003-2048-0

Smith SN, Lai Z, Almirall D, Goodrich DE, Abraham KM, Nord KM, et al. Implementing effective policy in a national mental health reengagement program for veterans. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2017;205(2):161–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000000592

Carasso BS, Lagarde M, Cheelo C, Chansa C, Palmer N. Health worker perspectives on user fee removal in Zambia. Hum Resour Health. 2012;10:40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-10-40

Goldsmith REH, C.F. Measuring consumer innovativeness. J Acad Mark Sci. 1991;19(3):209–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02726497

Webster CA, Caputi P, Perreault M, Doan R, Doutis P, Weaver RG. Elementary classroom teachers’ adoption of physical activity promotion in the context of a statewide policy: an innovation diffusion and socio-ecologic perspective. J Teach Phys Educ. 2013;32(4):419–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.32.4.419

Aarons GA, Glisson C, Hoagwood K, Kelleher K, Landsverk J, Cafri G. Psychometric properties and U.S. National norms of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS). Psychol Assess. 2010;22(2):356–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019188

Gill KJ, Campbell E, Gauthier G, Xenocostas S, Charney D, Macaulay AC. From policy to practice: implementing frontline community health services for substance dependence--study protocol. Implement Sci. 2014;9:108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0108-x

Lavinghouze SR, Price AW, Parsons B. The environmental assessment instrument: harnessing the environment for programmatic success. Health Promot Pract. 2009;10(2):176–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839908330811

Bull FC, Milton K, Kahlmeier S. National policy on physical activity: the development of a policy audit tool. J Phys Act Health. 2014;11(2):233–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2012-0083

Bull F, Milton K, Kahlmeier S, Arlotti A, Juričan AB, Belander O, et al. Turning the tide: national policy approaches to increasing physical activity in seven European countries. British J Sports Med. 2015;49(11):749–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-093200

Schneider EC, Smith ML, Ory MG, Altpeter M, Beattie BL, Scheirer MA, et al. State fall prevention coalitions as systems change agents: an emphasis on policy. Health Promot Pract. 2016;17(2):244–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839915610317

Helfrich CD, Savitz LA, Swiger KD, Weiner BJ. Adoption and implementation of mandated diabetes registries by community health centers. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33(1,Suppl):S50-S65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.04.002

Donchin M, Shemesh AA, Horowitz P, Daoud N. Implementation of the Healthy Cities’ principles and strategies: an evaluation of the Israel Healthy Cities network. Health Promot Int. 2006;21(4):266–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dal024

Were MC, Emenyonu N, Achieng M, Shen C, Ssali J, Masaba JP, et al. Evaluating a scalable model for implementing electronic health records in resource-limited settings. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17(3):237–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2009.002303

Konduri N, Sawyer K, Nizova N. User experience analysis of e-TB Manager, a nationwide electronic tuberculosis recording and reporting system in Ukraine. ERJ Open Research. 2017;3:2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00002-2017

McDonnell E, Probart C. School wellness policies: employee participation in the development process and perceptions of the policies. J Child Nutr Manag. 2008;32:1.

Mersini E, Hyska J, Burazeri G. Evaluation of national food and nutrition policy in Albania. Zdravstveno Varstvo. 2017;56(2):115–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sjph-2017-0015

Cavagnero E, Daelmans B, Gupta N, Scherpbier R, Shankar A. Assessment of the health system and policy environment as a critical complement to tracking intervention coverage for maternal, newborn, and child health. Lancet. 2008;371 North American Edition(9620):1284-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60563-2

Lehman WE, Greener JM, Simpson DD. Assessing organizational readiness for change. J Subst Abus Treat. 2002;22(4):197–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-5472(02)00233-7

Pankratz M, Hallfors D, Cho H. Measuring perceptions of innovation adoption: the diffusion of a federal drug prevention policy. Health Educ Res. 2002;17(3):315–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/her/17.3.315

Cook JM, Thompson R, Schnurr PP. Perceived characteristics of intervention scale: development and psychometric properties. Assessment. 2015;22(6):704–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114561254

Probart C, McDonnell ET, Jomaa L, Fekete V. Lessons from Pennsylvania’s mixed response to federal school wellness law. Health Aff. 2010;29(3):447–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0732

Probart C, McDonnell E, Weirich JE, Schilling L, Fekete V. Statewide assessment of local wellness policies in Pennsylvania public school districts. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008;108(9):1497–502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2008.06.429

Rakic S, Novakovic B, Stevic S, Niskanovic J. Introduction of safety and quality standards for private health care providers: a case-study from the Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Int J Equity Health. 2018;17(1):92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0806-0

Rozema AD, Mathijssen JJP, Jansen MWJ, van Oers JAM. Sustainability of outdoor school ground smoking bans at secondary schools: a mixed-method study. Eur J Pub Health. 2018;28(1):43–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckx099

Barbero C, Moreland-Russell S, Bach LE, Cyr J. An evaluation of public school district tobacco policies in St. Louis County, Missouri. J Sch Health. 2013;83(8):525–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12061

Williams KM, Kirsh S, Aron D, Au D, Helfrich C, Lambert-Kerzner A, et al. Evaluation of the Veterans Health Administration’s specialty care transformational initiatives to promote patient-centered delivery of specialty care: a mixed-methods approach. Telemed J E-Health. 2017;23(7):577–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2016.0166

Spencer E, Walshe K. National quality improvement policies and strategies in European healthcare systems. Quality Safety Health Care. 2009;18(Suppl 1):i22–i7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2008.029355

Assunta M, Dorotheo EU. SEATCA Tobacco Industry Interference Index: a tool for measuring implementation of WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Article 5.3. Tob Control. 2016;25(3):313–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051934

Tummers L. Policy alienation of public professionals: the construct and its measurement. Public Adm Rev. 2012;72(4):516–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02550.x

Tummers L, Bekkers V. Policy implementation, street-level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretion. Public Manag Rev. 2014;16(4):527–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841978

Raghavan R, Bright CL, Shadoin AL. Toward a policy ecology of implementation of evidence-based practices in public mental health settings. Implement Sci. 2008;3:26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-3-26

Peters D, Harting J, van Oers H, Schuit J, de Vries N, Stronks K. Manifestations of integrated public health policy in Dutch municipalities. Health Promot Int. 2016;31(2):290–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dau104

Tosun J, Lang A. Policy integration: mapping the different concepts. Policy Studies. 2017;38(6):553–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239

Tubbing L, Harting J, Stronks K. Unravelling the concept of integrated public health policy: concept mapping with Dutch experts from science, policy, and practice. Health Policy. 2015;119(6):749–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.12.020

Donkin A, Goldblatt P, Allen J, Nathanson V, Marmot M. Global action on the social determinants of health. BMJ Glob Health. 2017;3(Suppl 1):e000603-e. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000603

Baum F, Friel S. Politics, policies and processes: a multidisciplinary and multimethods research programme on policies on the social determinants of health inequity in Australia. BMJ Open. 2017;7(12):e017772-e. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017772

Delany T, Lawless A, Baum F, Popay J, Jones L, McDermott D, et al. Health in All Policies in South Australia: what has supported early implementation? Health Promot Int. 2016;31(4):888–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dav084

Valaitis R, MacDonald M, Kothari A, O'Mara L, Regan S, Garcia J, et al. Moving towards a new vision: implementation of a public health policy intervention. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3056-3

Bennett LM, Gadlin H, Marchand, C. Collaboration team science: a field guide. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health; 2018. Contract No.: NIH Publication No. 18-7660.

Mazumdar M, Messinger S, Finkelstein DM, Goldberg JD, Lindsell CJ, Morton SC, et al. Evaluating academic scientists collaborating in team-based research: a proposed framework. Acad Med. 2015;90(10):1302–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000759

Brownson RC, Fielding JE, Green LW. Building capacity for evidence-based public health: reconciling the pulls of practice and the push of research. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;39:27–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014746

Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK. Future issues in dissemination and implementation research. In: Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, editors. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice. Second Edition ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190683214.003.0029

Thomson K, Hillier-Brown F, Todd A, McNamara C, Huijts T, Bambra C. The effects of public health policies on health inequalities in high-income countries: an umbrella review. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5677-1

Published

11-01-2020

How to Cite

Alsulaiman, A. lbrahim, Almzairie, K. A., Alharbi, M. S. S., & Alsomali, O. H. (2020). The role of health administration technicians in public health policy implementation. International Journal of Health Sciences, 4(S1), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v4nS1.15278

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>