Principles of administrative judiciary the UAE judicial system
Keywords:
adjudicating claims, administrative cases, administrative judiciary, injustice, judiciary IslamAbstract
The study aims to analyze the general principles of the administrative judiciary in the United Arab Emirates in comparison with Islamic law by examining the history of the administrative judiciary in Islamic law and Emirati legislation, identifying obstacles to the application and development of administrative judiciary in the United Arab Emirates, and evaluating the role of the administrative judiciary in monitoring the work of the official administration In the United Arab Emirates. The problem of the study is the modernity of the administrative judiciary and its limitation to annulment, compensation, and the disciplinary proceedings. The researcher uses the descriptive-analytical approach and the comparative approach to achieve the objectives of the study and to find solutions to the problem at hand. The study concludes with a set of results and recommendations, the most important of which is that Islam was the first religion to come up with the idea of establishing an office for adjudicating claims of injustice. The administrative judiciary is considered a real guarantee to control the decisions of the official administration and not to oppress individuals. Besides, the administrative judiciary in the UAE is newly established compared to the administrative judiciary in other countries.
Downloads
References
Abdul Latif Nayef, (2012). Administrative judiciary jurisdictions, authorities, and limitations. A study presented to participate in the second conference of heads of administrative courts in the Arab countries, held in the United Arab Emirates.
Abdul Wahab Abdoul (2013): A ten-year overview of the history of the Federal Supreme Court from its inception to its 40th year. Research paper, Federal Supreme Court, United Arab Emirates.
Ahmed Al-Soghairy (2006). Administrative and local courts in the United Arab Emirates and their role in annulling administrative decisions compared to courts in France, England, and Egypt. Ph.D. Thesis, Ain Shams University, Egypt.
Alywa Fath al-Bab (2013): The Introduction to Administrative Law. Judicial Department, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Amer Al-Hajry (2011). Judicial review over the causes of the defect in the administrative decision review case. Sultanate of Oman.
Ammar Awabdi (1994): The Process of Judicial review of Public Administration in the Algerian System. University Publications Office, Algeria.
Federal Law No. 10 of 2014 amending some provisions of the Civil Procedure Law No. 11 of 1992.
Ibri Muheisen (2016). Judicial review over the discretionary power of administration, legitimacy, and application. Zia Network for Studies and Conferences, Casablanca, Morocco
Jamal Karrouf (2006): Judicial Supervision of Administrative Control, University of Badji Mokhtar, Annaba, Algeria.
Khaled Al-Zahir (2010). Judicial review to ensure the principle of legality in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Law Journal for Legal and Economic Research, Issue 2, Alexandria University, Egypt.
Law No. 23 of 2006 on the formation of administrative departments.
Muhammad Khleifi (2015). Judicial controls over management discretion, a comparative study. Ph.D. thesis, Abi Bakr Belkaid University, Tlemcen, Algeria.
Omar Boureit, (2007). Judicial review of administrative control measures. Master's thesis, University of Mentouri, Constantine, Algeria.
Razaaqa Abdullatif 2014. Administrative control over the legality of administrative decisions in Algerian legislation. Master's thesis, El Oued University, Algeria.
Saad Dukhan (2016): Judicial review of the Legislative Actions of the Executive Authority, A Comparative Analytical Study. Master's thesis, Islamic University, Gaza, Palestine.
Suleiman Al-Dawad, (1995) The system of grievances in Islam. Ph.D. thesis, Zaytouna University, Tunisia.
The UAE Constitution of 1996
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
