Ultraviolet irradiation doses for coronavirus inactivation -review and analysis of coronavirus photo inactivation studies

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.5038

Authors

  • Vikrant Mankar Clinical Instructor, Child Health Nursing, Datta Meghe College of Nursing, Wanadongri, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India 441110
  • Amit Dhengre Assistant Professor, Medical Surgical Nursing, Datta Meghe College of Nursing, Wanadongri, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India 441110
  • Netranjali Agashe Clinical Instructor, Medical Surgical Nursing, Datta Meghe College of Nursing, Wanadongri, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India 441110
  • Hina Rodge Student, Child Health Nursing, Smt.Radhikabai Meghe College of Nursing, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India 442001
  • Dhruba Hari Chandi Assistant Professor Dept. of Microbiology Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha-442001

Keywords:

COVID-19, MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV, ultraviolet, UVC

Abstract

Background: To slow the increasing global spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, appropriate disinfection techniques are required. Ultraviolet radianon (UV) has a well-known antiviral effect. But measurements on the radiation dose necessary to inactivate SARS-CoV-2 have not been pub- lished so far. Methods: Coronavirus inactivation experiments with ultraviolet light performed in the past were evaluated to determine the UV radiation dose required for a 90% virus reduction. This analysis is based on the fact that all coronaviruses have a similar structure and similar RNA strand length. Results: The available data reveals large variations, which are apparently not caused by the coronaviruses but by the experimental conditions selected. If these are excluded as far as possible, it appears that coronaviruses are very UV sensitive. The upper limit determined for the log-reduction dose (90% reduction) is approximately 10.6 mJ/cm2 (median), while the true value is  probably only 3.7 mJ/cm2 (median). Conclusion: Since coronaviruses do not differ structurally to any great exent, the SARS-CoV-2 virus – as well as possible future mutations – will very likely be highly UV sensitive, so that common UV disinfection procedures will inactivate the new SARS-CoV-2 virus without any further modification.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Johns Hopkins University. Coronavirus Resource Center – COVID- 19 Dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University. [accessed 2020 May 6]. Available from: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html.

Budowsky EI, Bresler SE, Friedman EA, Zheleznova NV. Principles of selective inactivation of viral genome. I. UV-induced inactivation of influenza virus. Arch Virol. 1981;68(3-4):239-47.

Chevrefils G, Caron É. UV dose required to achieve incremental Log inactivation of bacteria, protozoa and viruses. IUVA News. 2006;8(1):38-45.

Darnell MER, Taylor DR. Evaluation of inactivation methods for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus in noncellular blood products. Transfusion. 2006 Oct;46(10):1770-7.

Terpstra F et al. Potential and limitation of UVC irradiation for the inactivation of pathogens in platelet concentrates. Transfusion. 2008Feb;48(2):304-13.

Pratelli A. Canine coronavirus inactivation with physical and chemical agents. Vet J. 2008 Jul;177(1):71-9.

Darnell MER, Subbarao K, Feinstone SM, Taylor DR. Inactivation of the coronavirus that induces severe acute respiratory syndrome, SARS-CoV. J Virol Methods. 2004 Oct; 121(1):85-91.

Weiss M, Horzinek MC. Resistance of Berne virus to physical and chemical treatment. Vet Microbiol. 1986 Feb;11(1):41-9.

Cavanagh D. Coronaviruses and Toroviruses. In: Zuckerman AJ, Banatvala JE, Pattison JR, editors. Principles and practice of clinical virology. 4th ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2000. p. 345-56.

Published

24-03-2022

How to Cite

Mankar, V., Dhengre, A., Agashe, N., Rodge, H., & Chandi, D. H. (2022). Ultraviolet irradiation doses for coronavirus inactivation -review and analysis of coronavirus photo inactivation studies. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S2), 466–472. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.5038

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles