Determinants of product innovativeness on innovation performance for pharmaceutical business in Thailand
Keywords:
Emotional capability, product innovativeness, innovation performanceAbstract
Emotional capability is an important part of firm capabilities that play a crucial factor in improving the existing innovation performance of the sector, this capability should be expanded by firms to get better performance in the field of innovation. The main objective of this research paper is to find the impact of emotional capability on the innovation performance of the pharmaceutical sector of Thailand. The model of this research study includes many dimensions of emotional capability such as dynamics of display freedom, identification, reconciliation, and experience. The mediating role of product innovativeness was also been identified in enhancing the relationship between emotional capability and innovation performance. For this purpose, most of the data and information of this research were collected from employees and managers of different pharmaceutical firms of Thailand using the technique of a questionnaire survey. The structural equation modeling technique is used to check the validity of hypotheses along with KMO method. The findings of this research paper indicate that all the proposed hypotheses are accepted which means that the independent variable of the emotional capability of a firm can significantly improve the innovation performance.
Downloads
References
Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., & Byrne, J. (2008). The moderating role of environmental dynamism between firm emotional capability and performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management.
Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., & Byrne, J. (2009). Organizational emotional capability, product and process innovation, and firm performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 26(3), 103-130.
Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., Byrne, J. C., & Aren, S. (2007). Emotional and learning capability and their impact on product innovativeness and firm performance. Technovation, 27(9), 501-513.
Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. (1995). Emotion in the workplace: A reappraisal. Human relations, 48(2), 97-125.
Avlonitis, G. J., & Salavou, H. E. (2007). Entrepreneurial orientation of SMEs, product innovativeness, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 566-575.
Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10(S1), 107-124.
Börjesson, S., & Löfsten, H. (2012). Capabilities for innovation in small firms–a study of 131 high-tech firms and their relation to performance. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 6(2), 149-176.
Brockman, B. K., & Morgan, R. M. (2003). The role of existing knowledge in new product innovativeness and performance. Decision Sciences, 34(2), 385-419.
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of management review, 20(2), 343-378.
Bustinza, O. F., Gomes, E., Vendrell‐Herrero, F., & Baines, T. (2019). Product–service innovation and performance: the role of collaborative partnerships and R&D intensity. R&d Management, 49(1), 33-45.
Danneels, E., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2015). product innovativeness from the firm’s perspective: its dimensions and their impact on project selection and performance. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 1999 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference.
Deshpandé, R., Farley, J. U., & Webster Jr, F. E. (1993). Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: a quadrad analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 23-37.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration: Univ of California Press.
Giddens, A. (1991). Structuration theory. Past, Present and Future. In: Bryant, C. and Jary, D.(eds.). Giddens’ Theory of Structuration. A Critical Appreciation. London: Routledge.
Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. (1998). Market orientation and organizational performance: is innovation a missing link? Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 30-45.
Hassan, S. G., Hameed, W. U., Basheer, M. F., & Ali, J. (2020). ZAKAT COMPLIANCE INTENTION AMONG SELF-EMPLOYED PEOPLE: EVIDENCE FROM PUNJAB, PAKISTAN. AL-ADWAH, 34(2), 80-96.
Hodgkinson, G. P., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2018). The dynamics of intuition and analysis in managerial and organizational decision making. Academy of management perspectives, 32(4), 473-492.
Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. Journal of marketing, 62(3), 42-54.
Huy, Q. N. (1999). Emotional capability, emotional intelligence, and radical change. Academy of management review, 24(2), 325-345.
Huy, Q. N. (2005a). An emotion-based view of strategic renewal. Advances in strategic management, 22, 3-37.
Huy, Q. N. (2005b). Emotion management to facilitate strategic change and innovation: How emotional balancing and emotional capability work together Emotions in organizational behavior (pp. 302-323): Psychology Press.
Iqbal, J., & Hameed, W. U. (2020). Open Innovation Challenges and Coopetition-Based Open-Innovation Empirical Evidence From Malaysia Innovative Management and Business Practices in Asia (pp. 144-166): IGI Global.
Jajja, M. S. S., Kannan, V. R., Brah, S. A., & Hassan, S. Z. (2017). Linkages between firm innovation strategy, suppliers, product innovation, and business performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management.
Kerdpitak C.(2020). The decision of travelers in choosing to use of service low-cost airlines.International
Journal of Business Tourism and Applied Sciences. 8(2), 43-51.
Kerdpitak C. (2022). Business Performance Model of Herbal Community Enterprise in Thailand.
Uncertain Supply Chain Management.Vol.10 No.2 P.345-352.
Kerdpitak C. (2021). The relationship between CRM strategy and customer satisfaction in rice
business in north-eastern Thailand. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. Vol. 56 No. 2 P.431-442.
Kobarg, S., Stumpf-Wollersheim, J., & Welpe, I. M. (2019). More is not always better: Effects of collaboration breadth and depth on radical and incremental innovation performance at the project level. Research Policy, 48(1), 1-10.
Li, S. (2019). The relationship between organizational emotional capability and employee innovation behavior of S&T enterprise. Paper presented at the 3rd International Seminar on Education Innovation and Economic Management (SEIEM 2018).
Liu, F., & Maitlis, S. (2014). Emotional dynamics and strategizing processes: A study of strategic conversations in top team meetings. Journal of Management Studies, 51(2), 202-234.
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic management journal, 3(1), 1-25.
Muller, E., & Peres, R. (2019). The effect of social networks structure on innovation performance: A review and directions for research. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 36(1), 3-19.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of management review, 23(2), 242-266.
Perel, M. (2005). You can innovate in hard times. Research-Technology Management, 48(4), 14-23.
Prajogo, D. I., & Ahmed, P. K. (2006). Relationships between innovation stimulus, innovation capacity, and innovation performance. R&d Management, 36(5), 499-515.
Pullen, A., de Weerd‐Nederhof, P. C., Groen, A. J., & Fisscher, O. A. (2012). SME network characteristics vs. product innovativeness: how to achieve high innovation performance. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(2), 130-146.
Rauter, R., Globocnik, D., Perl-Vorbach, E., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2019). Open innovation and its effects on economic and sustainability innovation performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(4), 226-233.
Salomo, S., Weise, J., & Gemünden, H. G. (2007). NPD planning activities and innovation performance: the mediating role of process management and the moderating effect of product innovativeness. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(4), 285-302.
Schoemaker, P. J., Heaton, S., & Teece, D. (2018). Innovation, dynamic capabilities, and leadership. California Management Review, 61(1), 15-42.
Stones, R. (2005). Structuration theory: Macmillan International Higher Education.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
