Comparison between efficacy of turbine handpiece vs conventional motor handpiece in surgical removal of impacted third molar

A review

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.5470

Authors

  • Sunil Kumar Gulia Ph.D Scholar, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, SGT University, Chandu Budhera, Gurugram, Haryana, India
  • Sanjeev Kumar Professor and HOD, Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, SGT University, Chandu Budhera, Gurugram, Haryana, India
  • Rahul Kashyap Professor, Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, I.T.S. Centre for Dental Studies & Research, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Keerat Preet Kour Resident Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, SGT University, Chandu Budhera, Gurugram, Haryana, India
  • Aasimah Hameed Resident oral and maxillofacial surgery, SGT University, Chandu Budhera, Gurugram, Haryana, India
  • Rishabh Thakker Resident oral and maxillofacial surgery, SGT University, Chandu Budhera, Gurugram, Haryana, India

Keywords:

turbine handpiece, conventional motor handpiece, surgical removal, impacted third molar

Abstract

Lower third molar extraction is one of the most common surgical procedure performed in oral surgery but despite the surgical skills and expertise, complications are likely. These can be pain, swelling, bleeding, infection, fracture of adjacent tooth and nerve damage et cetra. One of the most essential armamentarium necessary for removal of impacted third molar is a handpiece with a bur used for removal of bone surrounding the tooth or odontectomy. This is usually done using a straight motor driven handpiece rotating at an approximate speed of 30,000 RPM. However, because of the low speed and torque the time taken in extraction can increase significantly making the procedure hectic and fatiguing for the patient a well as the surgeon. Air turbine handpiece is a precision device which can be used for removal of tooth tissue with reasonably less pressure, heat or vibration thus making the cutting facile, less demanding and less time consuming. However, the fear of Subcutaneous emphysema associated with it’s use due to expulsion if air from the air turbine limit it’s use. Although rare, iatrogenic subcutaneous emphysema can have grave and potentially life-threatening consequences. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jerjes, W., Upile, T., Nhembe, F., Gudka, D., Shah, P., Abbas, S., Mccarthy, E., Patel, S., Mahil, J., & Hopper, C. (2010). Experience in third molar surgery: an update. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.581

Brauer HU, Dent M, Green RA, Pynn BR. Complications during and after surgical removal of third molars. Mag Oral Health. 2013.

Hanna KM, Bagoury EZ, Ragab AR. The Effect of Handpiece Speed on Post-Operative Oedema after Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third molar: Limited Clinical Study (Doctoral dissertation, Cairo University).

Bhandary N, Desai A, Shetty YB. High speed handpieces. Journal of international oral health: JIOH. 2014 Feb;6(1):130.

Eikenberg S, Roman D, Debuque R, et al. A comparison and evaluation of electric motor dental handpieces and air turbine dental handpieces. Great Lakes, Ill.: United States Army Dental Research Attachment; April 2000:1-75. Protocol 451.

. Benjamin SD. Evolving technologies for improved ergonomics: selecting an appropriate electric handpiece. Pract Proc Aesthet Dent 2003;15:400-1

Dyson JE, Darvell BW. The development of the dental high‐speed air turbine handpiece. Part 1. Australian Dental Journal. 1993 Feb;38(1):49-58.

Romeo U, Galanakis A, Lerario F, Daniele GM, Tenore G, Palaia G. Subcutaneous emphysema during third molar surgery: a case report. Brazilian dental journal. 2011;22:83-6.

Horowitz I, Hirshberg A, Freedman A. Pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema following surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: three case reports. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 1987 Jan 1;63(1):25-8.

Chen SC, Lin FY, Chang KJ. Subcutaneous emphysema and pneumomediastinum after dental extraction. The American journal of emergency medicine. 1999 Nov 1;17(7):678-80.

Arai I, Aoki T, Yamazaki H, Ota Y, Kaneko A. Pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema after dental extraction detected incidentally by regular medical checkup: a case report. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2009 Apr 1;107(4):e33-8.

Sekine J, Irie A, Dotsu H, Inokuchi T. Bilateral pneumothorax with extensive subcutaneous emphysema manifested during third molar surgery: A case report. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2000 Oct 1;29(5):355-7.

Yang SC, Chiu TH, Lin TJ, Chan HM. Subcutaneous emphysema and pneumomediastinum secondary to dental extraction: a case report and literature review. The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences. 2006 Dec 1;22(12):641-5.

Peñarrocha M, Ata-Ali J, Carrillo C, Peñarrocha M. Subcutaneous emphysema resulting from surgical extraction without elevation of a mucoperiosteal skin flap. J Clin Exp Dent. 2011;3(3):e265-7

Bouloux GF, Steed MB, Perciaccante VJ. Complications of third molar surgery. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics. 2007 Feb 1;19(1):117-28

Kenyon BJ, Van Zyl I, Louie KG. Comparison of cavity preparation quality using an electric motor handpiece and an air turbine dental handpiece.

Taylor DF, Perkins RR, Kumpula JW. Characteristics of some air turbine handpieces. J Am Dent Assoc 1962; 64:794-805.

Turnbull A. A remarkable coincidence in dental surgery. Br Med J 1900;1:1131

Yoshimoto A, Mitamura Y, Nakamura H, et al. Acute dyspnea during dental extraction. Respiration 2002;69: 369–71

Torres-Melero J, Arias-Diaz J, Balibren JL. Pneumomediastinum secondary to use of high speed air turbine drill during a dental extraction. Thorax 1996;51:339–40

Meyerhoff WL, Nelson R, Fry WA. Mediastinal emphysema after oral surgery. J Oral Surg 1973;31:477–9.

Iyer S, Weiss C, Mehta A, Effects of drill speed on heat production and the rate and quality of bone formation in dental implant osteotomies. Part II: Relationship between drill speed and healing. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 10: 536-540, 1997.

Hall, R. M, Surgical removal of impacted teeth using air turbine unit. Journal of Oral Surgery, Anesthesia, and Hospital Dental Service, 17:3, 1959.

Mazorow H B, Bone repair after experimental procedure defect. Journal of Oral Surgery, Anesthesia, and Hospital Dental Service, 18: 107, 1960.

Corkery PF, Bone and tooth cutting in oral surgery: A review of methods in current use. Journal of the Irish Dental Association, 15: 27-30, 1969.

Youdelman SA, High speed and oral surgery, Journal of the Indian Dental Association, 41: 127-128, 1969.

Bissell SL, Study of air turbine versus conventional handpiece on odontectomies. Journal of the American Dental Association, 72: 645-647, 1966.

Spatz S, Early reaction in bone following the use of burs rotating at conventional and ultra speeds. Journal of Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 19: 808-816, 1965.

Costicher, Youngblood PJ, Walden JM, A study of the effects of high speed rotary instruments on bone repair in Dogs. Journal of Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 17: 563-571, 1964.

Nisha Nandal, Dr. Naveen Nandal, Ms. Neetu Jora. (2021). Perception of Online Learning Among College Students: A Systematic. International Journal of Modern Agriculture, 10(1), 1142 - 1149. Retrieved from http://www.modern-journals.com/index.php/ijma/article/view/1377

Kelly HC & Kay LW, The impacted wisdom tooth. 3rd ed. Churchill Livingstone, London, p: 18-19, 1978.

Rafat H.A, The effect of the use of engine driven aerator in removal of impacted mandibular third molar and its effect on post-operative complications, Master Thesis in Oral Surgery, Cairo University, 1991.

Kilpatrick HC, Removal of impacted third molars utilizing speeds up to 200000rpm. Journal of Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 11: 364- 369, 1958.

Baral P. Use of Air-Turbine for Removal of Impacted Teeth. Research & Reviews: A Journal of Dentistry. 2013;4(3):43-4.

Zhao-zhong G, Heng Z, Yan L, Xin L, Yin L, Yang W, Chun-xia Y, Xue L. Comparative study of complications among routine method, high speed turbine handpiece and piezosurgery device after extraction of impacted wisdom teeth. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology. 2012 Apr 1;21(2).

Hanna KM, Bagoury EZ, Ragab AR. The Effect of Handpiece Speed on Post-Operative Oedema after Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third molar: Limited Clinical Study (Doctoral dissertation, Cairo University).

Published

03-04-2022

How to Cite

Gulia, S. K., Kumar, S., Kashyap, R., Kour, K. P., Hameed, A., & Thakker, R. (2022). Comparison between efficacy of turbine handpiece vs conventional motor handpiece in surgical removal of impacted third molar: A review. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S3), 770–777. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.5470

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)