Assessment of efficacy of diclofenac sodium in oral and transdermal patch in the management of postoperative pain following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.7114

Authors

  • Jitender Oral and maxillofacial surgeon, Senior resident in Kalpana Chawla Medical College and Hospital, Karnal, Haryana
  • Varun Arora MDS Periodontics & Implantology, Practising dentist at Asian Dental Care, Aggarsen Chowk Kurukshetra, Haryana
  • Roohi Singh BDS, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India
  • Kanica Gandhi PG student Department of Prosthodontics, Crown Bridge Implantology at MM College Of Dental Sciences & Research, MMU, Mullana, Haryana

Keywords:

Transdermal diclofenac, pain, mandibular third molars

Abstract

Background: Pain is one of the most commonly experienced symptoms in surgery and as such is a major concern to the surgeon. The present study was conducted to assess analgesic efficacy of diclofenac sodium in oral and transdermal patch in the management of postoperative pain following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Materials & Methods: 80 patients with bilateral impactions of mandibular third molar of both genders were divided into 2 groups of 40 each. In group I, patients received diclofenac sodium 100 mg once a day for 3 days on one side and in group II, diclofenac sodium transdermal patch 100 mg once a day for 3 days on second side. The postoperative pain was recorded on visual analog scale (VAS) at 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours postoperatively. Results: Out of 80 patients, males were 35 and females were 45. VAS on day 1 in group I and II at 2 hours was 4.6 and 5.3, at 4 hours was 4.3 and 4.7, at 8 hours was 3.2 and 4.1, at 12 hours was 2.7 and 4.0 and at 24 hours was 2.4 and 3.2 respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M (2011) Measures of adult pain. Arthritis Care Res 63:240–252.

Cooper SA (1983) Models for clinical assessment of oral analgesics. Am J Med Novemb 14:24–29.

Vaile JH, Davis P (1998) Topical NSAIDs for musculoskeletal conditions. A Rev Lit Drugs 56:783–799.

Scheindlin S (2004) Transdermal drug delivery: past, present, future. Mol Interv 4:308–312.

Arora P, Mukherjee B (2002) Design, development, physicochemical, and in vitro and in vivo evaluation of transdermal patches containing diclofenac diethylammonium salt. J Pharm Sci 91:2076–2089.

Pozos-Guillen A, Martinez-Rider R, Aguirre-Banuelos P, Perez-Urizar J (2007) Pre-Emptive Analgesic Effect of Tramadol After Mandibular Third Molar Extraction: A Pilot Study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65(7) 1315–1320.

Bailey BM, Zaki G, Rotman H, Woodwards RT (1993) A double-blind comparitive study of soluble aspirin and diclofenac dispersible in the control of postextraction pain after removal of impacted third molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 22(4): 238–241.

Meechan JG, Seymour RA (1993) The use of third molar in clinical pharmacology. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 31(6): 360–365.

Shugars DA, Benson K, White RP Jr, Simpson KN, Bader JD (1996) Developing a Measure of Patient Perceptions of Short- Term Outcomes of Third Molar Surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54(12): 1402–1408.

Samal D, Mishra N, Meher B, Kar IB, Kar R, Saipooja RH. Comparison of Safety, Efficacy, Patient Compliance and Cost-Effectiveness of Transdermal, Oral and Intramuscular Diclofenac for Pain Control Following Oral Surgical Procedures. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery. 2021 Mar;20(1):63-9.

Bachalli PS, Nandakumar H, Srinath N. A comparative study of diclofenac transdermal patch against oral diclofenac for pain control following removal of mandibular impacted third molars. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2009;8:167–172.

Published

09-05-2022

How to Cite

Jitender, J., Arora, V., Singh, R., & Gandhi, K. (2022). Assessment of efficacy of diclofenac sodium in oral and transdermal patch in the management of postoperative pain following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S1), 9329–9334. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.7114

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles