Assessment of the influence of soft tissue biotype on the marginal bone changes around dental implants

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.7117

Authors

  • Varun Kumar Senior resident, Department of Dentistry, Kalpana Chawla Government Medical College, Karnal
  • Varun Arora MDS Periodontics & Implantology, Practising dentist at Asian Dental Care, Aggarsen Chowk Kurukshetra, Haryana
  • Jitender Oral and maxillofacial surgeon, Senior resident in Kalpana Chawla Medical College and Hospital, Karnal, Haryana
  • Roohi Singh BDS, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India
  • Kanica Gandhi PG student Department of Prosthodontics, Crown Bridge Implantology at MM College Of Dental Sciences & Research, MMU, Mullana, Haryana

Keywords:

cementation, dental implants, peri-implant

Abstract

Background: Changes in peri-implant hard and soft tissues, as well as restorative and patient-based subjective measures are the most widely used parameters for evaluating the outcomes of implant therapy. The present study was conducted to assess the influence of soft tissue biotype on the marginal bone changes around dental implants. Materials & Methods: 58 patients who received dental implants of both genders were included. In all patients, initial mucosal thickness, marginal bone levels on radiographs, pain, and exudation were evaluated. All these parameters were recorded at the time of implant placement, at the time of cementation of final restoration, 6 months and 12 months post cementation. Results: Out of 58 patients, males were 20 and females were 38. The mean mucosal thickness at baseline, second stage, at cementation, 6 months and 12 months was 2.82, 1.90, 1.54, 2.62 and 3.42 in thick mucosa and 1.65, 0.84, 0.69, 1.14 and 1.62 at thin mucosa. The difference was significant (P< 0.05). The mean pocket depth at cementation was 2.52, at 6 months was 3.20 and at 12 months was 3.24 in thick and 2.12 at cementation, 3.10 at 6 months and 3.16 at 12 months in thin biotype respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bressan E, Paniz G, Lops D, Corazza B, Romeo E, Favero G. Influence of abutment material on the gingival color of implantsupported all-ceramic restorations: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:631-637.

Jung RE, Holderegger C, Sailer I, Khraisat A, Suter A, Hammerle CH. The effect of all-ceramic and porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations on marginal peri-implant soft tissue color: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008;28:357-365.

Kim A, Campbell SD, Viana MA, Knoernschild KL. Abutment material effect on peri-implant soft tissue color and perceived esthetics. J Prosthodont. 2016;25:634-640.

Lops D, Stellini E, Sbricoli L, Cea N, Romeo E, Bressan E. Influence of abutment material on peri-implant soft tissues in anterior areas with thin gingival biotype: A multicentric prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28:1263-1268.

Hutton CG, Johnson GK, Barwacz CA, Allareddy V, Avila-Ortiz G. Comparison of two different surgical approaches to increase peri-implant mucosal thickness: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2018;89:807-814.

Benic GI, Mokti M, Chen CJ, Weber HP, Hammerle CH, Gallucci GO. Dimensions of buccal bone and mucosa at immediately placed implants after 7 years: a clinical and cone beam computed tomography study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:560-566.

Yoshino S, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Roe P, Lozada JL. Effects of connective tissue grafting on the facial gingival level following single immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the esthetic zone: A 1-year randomized controlled prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:432-440.

Migliorati M, Amorfini L, Signori A, Biavati AS, Benedicenti S. Clinical and aesthetic outcome with post-extractive implants with or without soft tissue augmentation: A 2-year randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17:983-995.

Thoma DS, Naenni N, Figuero E, et al. Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(Suppl 15):32-49.

Bhat PR, Thakur SL, Kulkarni SS. The influence of soft tissue biotype on the marginal bone changes around dental implants: A 1-year prospective clinico-radiological study. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2015 Nov;19(6):640.

Sharma S, Thakur SL, Joshi SK, Kulkarni SS. Measurement of gingival thickness using digital vernier caliper and ultrasonographic method: A comparative study. J Investig Clin Dent. 2014;5:138–43.

Brisman DL. The effect of speed, pressure, and time on bone temperature during the drilling of implant sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:35–7.

Chan D, Pelekos G, Ho D, Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. The depth of the implant mucosal tunnel modifies the development and resolution of experimental peri-implant mucositis: a case-control study. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46:248-255.

Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of the 3-D bone-to implant relationship on esthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005;25:113-119.

Published

09-05-2022

How to Cite

Kumar, V., Arora, V., Jitender, J., Singh, R., & Gandhi, K. (2022). Assessment of the influence of soft tissue biotype on the marginal bone changes around dental implants. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S1), 9342–9348. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.7117

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles