CBCT based assessment of crestal bone loss in patients treated with mandibular implant over dentures: An original research study

Mukesh Kumar Goyal; Shelly Goyal; Sandeep Kumar Garg; Avinash Venkatesh Mehendale; Adarsh V Hegde; Naresh Kumar

doi:10.53730/ijhs.v6nS4.9851

Authors

Mukesh Kumar Goyal
dr.mukeshgoyal@gmail.com
Professor, Department of Prosthodontics & Crown and Bridge, Institute of Dental Sciences, Bareilly, India
Shelly Goyal Reader, Department of Prosthodontics & Crown and Bridge, Rama Dental College and Research Center, Kanpur, India
Sandeep Kumar Garg Post Graduate Student, Department of Periodontology & Oral Implantology, Surendera Dental College & Research Institute, Sriganganagar, Rajasthan, India
Avinash Venkatesh Mehendale Reader, Department of Prosthodontics & Crown and Bridge, AJ Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
Adarsh V Hegde Senior Lecturer Department of Prosthodontics & Crown and Bridge, AJ Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
Naresh Kumar Professor & Head, Department of Periodontology & Oral Implantology, Maharaja Ganga Singh Dental College and Research Centre, Sriganganagar, Rajasthan, India

Keywords:

cone beam computed tomography, bone loss, implant, overdenture

Abstract

Aim: The exclusive aim of this study was to assess of crestal bone loss in patients treated with mandibular implant over dentures. Authors utilized three dimensional diagnostic tool i.e. cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for the study. Materials & Methods: The study was conducted in the department of Prosthodontics of the institute wherein systematic sampling procedure was done to select completely edentulous patients. Complete dentures were fabricated with standard manner with compression moulding technique and heat cure acrylic resin. Cone beam computed tomography was completed to assess the bone quality and quantity at desired locations. Total 6 male and 6 female patients were included in the study. Group I has the implants of the right side of the mandible and Group II has implant placed on the left side of the mandible. The twenty four implants were studied in detail for bone losses in post operative phases. at mesial, distal, buccal and lingual sides of the dental implants. P value less than 0.05 was considered significant (p< 0.05). Statistical Analysis and Results: Statistical analysis was completed by statistical software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atwood DA. Some clinical factors related to rate of resorption of residual ridges. 1962. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:119–125.

Tallgren A, Lang BR, Walker GF, Ash MM Jr. Roentgen cephalometric analysis of ridge resorption and changes in jaw and occlusal relationships in immediate complete denture wearers. J Oral Rehabil 1980;7:77–94.

Sun Z, Herring SW, Tee BC, Gales J. Alveolar ridge reduction after tooth extraction in adolescents: An animal study. Arch Oral Biol 2013;58: 813–825.

Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: A mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. 1972. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:427–435.

Devan MM. Basic principles in impression making. 1952. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:503–508.

Tuncay OC, Thomson S, Abadi B, Ellinger C. Cephalometric evaluation of the changes in patients wearing complete dentures. A ten-year longitudinal study. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:169–180.

Sennerby L, Carlsson GE, Bergman B, Warfvinge J. Mandibular bone resorption in patients treated with tissue-integrated prostheses and in complete-denture wearers. Acta Odontol Scand 1988;46:135–140.

Van Waas MA, Jonkman RE, Kalk W, Van‘t Hof MA, Plooij J, Van Os JH. Differences two years after tooth extraction in mandibular bone reduction in patients treated with immediate overdentures or with immediate complete dentures. J Dent Res 1993;72:1001–1004.

Carlsson GE. Responses of jawbone to pressure. Gerodontology 2004;21:65–70.

Maeda Y, Wood WW. Finite element method simulation of bone resorption beneath a complete denture. J Dent Res 1989;68:1370–1373.

Chen J, Ahmad R, Suenaga H, Li W, Swain M, Li Q. A comparative study on complete and implant retained denture treatments: A biomechanics perspective. J Biomech 2015;48:512–519.

Kydd WL, Daly CH. The biologic and mechanical effects of stress on oral mucosa. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:317–329.

Kelly E. Changes caused by a mandibular removable partial denture opposing a maxillary complete denture. 1972. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:213–219.

Saunders TR, Gillis RE Jr, Desjardins RP. The maxillary complete denture opposing the mandibular bilateral distal-extension partial denture: Treatment considerations. J Prosthet Dent 1979;41:124–128.

Raedel M, Lazarek-Scholz K, Marré B, Boening KW, Walter MH. Posterior alveolar ridge resorption in bar-retained mandibular overdentures: 10-year results of a prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:1397–1401.

Khuder T, Yunus N, Sulaiman E, Ibrahim N, Khalid T, Masood M. Association between occlusal force distribution in implant overdenture prostheses and residual ridge resorption. J Oral Rehabil 2017;44:398–404.

Elsyad MA, Alokda MM, Gebreel AA, Hammouda NI, Habib AA. Effect of two designs of implant-supported overdentures on peri-implant and posterior mandibular bone resorptions: A 5-year prospective radiographic study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28:e184–e192.

Elsyad MA, Mohamed SS, Shawky AF. Posterior mandibular ridge resorption associated with different retentive systems for overdentures: A 7-year retrospective preliminary study. Int J Prosthodont 2017;30:260–265.

Fontijn-Tekamp FA, Slagter AP, Van Der Bilt A, et al. Biting and chewing in overdentures, full dentures, and natural dentitions. J Dent Res 2000;79:1519–1524.

von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:344–349.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:1006–1012.

Wilding RJ, Levin I, Pepper R. The use of panoramic radiographs to measure alveolar bone areas. J Oral Rehabil 1987;14:557–567.

Xie Q, Soikkonen K, Wolf J, Mattila K, Gong M, Ainamo A. Effect of head positioning in panoramic radiography on vertical measurements: An in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996;25:61–66.

Plotnick IJ, Beresin VE, Simkins AB. The effects of variations in the opposing dentition on changes in the partially edentulous mandible. Part I. Bone changes observed in serial radiographs. J Prosthet Dent 1975;33:278–286.

Colaizzi FA, Michael CG, Javid NS, Gibbs CH. Condylar and incisal border movements: A comparative study of complete denture wearers and natural dentition subjects. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:453–459.

Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2022). Post-pandemic health and its sustainability: Educational situation. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(1), i-v. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6n1.5949

Widana, I.K., Sumetri, N.W., Sutapa, I.K., Suryasa, W. (2021). Anthropometric measures for better cardiovascular and musculoskeletal health. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(3), 550–561. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22202

Aprianto, D. R., Parenrengi, M. A., Utomo, B., Fauzi, A. A., & Subagyo, E. A. (2022). Autograft and implant cranioplasty in pediatric patients. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 5(1), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijhms.v5n1.1852