A comparative study between CAN score and Ponderal Index in identifying nutritional status of the neonate

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.10027

Authors

  • Sudhakara Babu Chelli Ph.D scholar, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
  • Surekha S. M. Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Koppal Institute of Medical Sciences, Koppal. Karnataka
  • Upendhar Reddy Pulluru Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, SVS Medical College, Mahbubnagar, Telangana.
  • Elumalai Prithiviraj Research faculty, Department of Anatomy, Sree Balaji Dental College Hospital, BIHER, Chennai. Tamil Nadu
  • Govindarajan Sumathy Govindarajan Sumathy, Professor & HOD, Department of Anatomy, Sree Balaji Dental College & Hospital, BIHER, Chennai, Tamil Nadu

Keywords:

intrauterine growth restriction, fetal malnutrition, small for gestational age, appropriate for gestational age, CAN score

Abstract

Introduction: Inadequate supply of nutrients to the fetus results in fetal malnutrition. As a result, the fetus fails to grow resulting in intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Though Small for Gestational Age (SGA) is used synonymously for IUGR but the later shows evidence of malnutrition. To detect fetal malnutrition various methods are being used currently. CAN is clinical method to detect the nutritional status through physical examination. Detection of fetal malnutrition by CAN score and comparing with other methods was the aim of this study. Materials and methods: This hospital based prospective study was carried on 200 neonates delivered in district government hospital, Koppal. Nutritional status assessment was done using CAN score and is compared with ponderal index and birth weight for gestational age. Results: Incidence of fetal malnutrition was 41.5% using CAN score. 10.5% small for gestational age neonates were well nourished and 7% appropriate for gestational age neonates were malnourished when detected through CAN score. 14% neonates showed malnutrition with PI<2.5 but when detected through CAN score it was 8%.Well-nourished neonates with PI>2.5 were 86% but after CAN score 33.5% showed malnutrition. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Scott KK, Usher RH. Fetal malnutrition: incidence, causes and effects.Amer J Obstetr 1966;94 (7): 951-63.

Peyter AC, Delhaes F, Baud D, Vial Y, Diaceri G, Menétrey S, Hohlfeld P, Tolsa JF. Intrauterine growth restriction is associated with structural alterations in human umbilical cord and decreased nitric oxide-induced relaxation of umbilical vein. Placenta. 2014 Nov;35(11):891-9. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2014.08.090. Epub 2014 Sep 2. PMID: 25249153.

Thammanna P.S,Sandeep M,Sridhar P.V. “A comparative study to assess fetal malnutrition by clinical assessment of nutritional status score (Can score) and anthropometric indices”. J of Evidence Based Med & Hlthcare; Vol.2, Issue37, September 14,2015; page:5820-5827.

Soundarya, M., Basavaprabhu, A., Raghuveera, K., Baliga, B., & Shivanagaraja, B. (2012). Comparative Assessment of Fetal Malnutrition by Anthropometry and CAN Score. Iranian journal of pediatrics, 22(1), 70–76.

Battaglia FC, Lubchenco LO, a practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age. J Pediatr 1967; 71:159-63.

Lubchenco LO, Hansman C, Boyd E. Intrauterine growth in length and head circumference as estimated from live births at gestational ages from 26 to 42 weeks. Pediatrics 1966;37;403-08.

Mohan M, Prasad SR, Chellani HK, Kapani V. Intrauterine growth curves in North Indian babies: weight, length, head circumference and Ponderal index. Ind Pediatr. 1990;27(1):43–51.

Metcoff J. Clinical assessment of nutritional status at birth. Fetal malnutrition and SGA are not synonymous. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1994;41(5):875–90.

Aderinsola OJ, Joseph AO. Looking for the best indicator fetal malnutrition, an overview. Nigeria Journal of Paediatric. 2007;4(1):111-7.

Martínez-Nadal S, Demestre X, Raspall F, Vila C, Álvarez J, Sala P. Assessment of foetal nutrition status at birth using the CANS score. Anales de Pediatría (English Edition). 2016 Apr 1;84(4):218-23.

Soundarya M, Basavaprabhu A, Raghuveera K, Baliga BS, Shivanagaraja BS. Comparative assessment of fetal malnutrition by anthropometry and CAN score. Iranian journal of pediatrics. 2012 Mar;22(1):70.

Kumari S, Jain S, Sethi GR, et al. A simple method of assessing for intrauterine growth retardation. Ind J Pediatr. 1988;55(2):283–6.

Sankhyan N, Sharma VK, Singh S. Detection of fetal malnutrition using “CAN score”. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2009 Sep;76(9):903-6.

Rao MR, Balakrishna N, Rao KV. Suitability of CAN SCORE for the assessment of the Nutritional Status of Newborns. Ind J Paed. 1999;66(4):483–92.

Adebami OJ, Owa JA. Comparison between CANSCORE and other anthropometric indicators in fetal malnutrition. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2008 May;75(5):439- 42.

Mehta S, Tandon A, Dua T, Kumari S, Singh SK. Clinical assessment of nutritional status at birth. Indian pediatrics. 1998 May 1; 35:423-8.

Amarendra M, Yoganand M. Comparison of clinical assessment of nutritional status (CAN) score with other methods in the assessment of fetal malnutrition. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2017 Jun;4(3):713-8.

Singhal V, Agal P, Kamath N. Detection of Fetal Malnutrition by CAN Score at Birth and its Comparison with other Methods of Determining Intrauterine Growth.

Lakkappa L, Somasundara S. Assessment of fetal nutrition status at birth using the clinical assessment of nutritional status score. Indian J Child Health. 2018; 5(12):713- 716.

Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national conference for fetal growth.Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87(2):163-8.

Use of a simple anthropometric measurement to predict birth weight.WHO Collaborative study of Birth Weight Surrogates. Bull World Health Organ 1993; 55(2):157-63.

Sunarmi, A., Haksari, E. L., & Fitriahadi, E. (2022). Childbirth counseling by WhatsApp group to reduce the anxiety of primigravida. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 5(3), 193-200. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijhms.v5n3.1905

Suryasa, W. (2019). Historical Religion Dynamics: Phenomenon in Bali Island. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 11(6), 1679-1685.

Published

30-06-2022

How to Cite

Chelli, S. B., Surekha, S. M., Pulluru, U. R., Prithiviraj, E., & Sumathy, G. (2022). A comparative study between CAN score and Ponderal Index in identifying nutritional status of the neonate. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S6), 3205–3213. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.10027

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles