Fetal biometry is assessment of fetal growth restriction in Telangana region
Keywords:
FGR, Doppler, morbidity, fetal biometry, ultrasound, estimated fetal weightAbstract
Background: Intrauterine increase restriction (IUGR) is most common complication in pregnancy and affects morbidity and mortality in any respect degrees of life. With current Doppler research of the fetal important circulation, inclusive of intracardiac flows and the ductus venosus, higher timing of shipping to decrease morbidity can be possible. Serial ultrasound measurements can offer an inexpensive estimate of fetal gestational age and weight primarily based totally on person and composite fetal biometric measurements. Materials and methods: This study consists of pregnant women who are attending OP /IP in department of OBG, SVS medical college, Mehabubnagar, Telanagana. All the retrospective USG quantitative data was noted in case proforma. Sample size was 100 in our study and was divided into cases and controls. Results: In 2nd trimester FGR parameters like FL (30.32), BPD (41.74), AC (136.34), HC (185.36) , GA (20.22) and EFW (310.04) were less when compared to normal fetus. In 3nd trimester we observed FL (61.44), BPD(79.64), AC(287.54) , HC(314.06) , GA (32.06) and EFW (1695.60) which were less when compared to normal fetus. Conclusion: that all the parameters in FGR from 2nd and 3rd trimester were less when compared to normal.
Downloads
References
Galan HL, Ferrazzi E, Hobbins JC. Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR): biometric and Doppler assessment. Prenatal Diagnosis: Published in Affiliation With the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis. 2002 Apr;22(4):331-7.
Neumann CH, Carroll BA. Fetal biometry and intrauterine growth retardation—current concepts. Western Journal of Medicine. 1984 Mar;140(3):414.
Chang TC, Robson SC, Boys RJ, Spencer JAD. Prediction of the small for gestational age infant: which ultrasonic measurement is best? Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 1030–1038.
Skovron ML, Berkowitz GS, Lapinski RH, Kim JM, Chitkara U. Evaluation of early third-trimester ultrasound screening for intrauterine growth retardation. J Ultrasound Med 1991; 10: 153–159.
Larciprete G, Valensise H, Di Pierro G, Vasapollo B, Casalino B, Arduini D, Jarvis S, Cirese E. Intrauterine growth restriction and fetal body composition. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005 Sep;26(3):258-62.
Galan HL, Rigano S, Radaelli T, Cetin I, Bozzo M, Chyu J, Hobbins JC, Ferrazzi E. Reduction of subcutaneous mass, but not lean mass, in normal fetuses in Denver, Colorado. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 839–844.
Bernstein IM, Goran MI, Amini SB, Catalano PM. Differential growth of fetal tissues during the second half of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176: 28–32.
Platz E, Newman R. Diagnosis of IUGR: traditional biometry. InSeminars in perinatology 2008 Jun 1 (Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 140-147). WB Saunders.
Chang TC, Robson SC, Boys RJ, Spencer JAD. Prediction of the small for gestational age infant: which ultrasonic measurementis best? Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 1030–1038.
Skovron ML, Berkowitz GS, Lapinski RH, Kim JM, Chitkara U.Evaluation of early third-trimester ultrasound screening for intrauterine growth retardation. J Ultrasound Med 1991; 10:153–159
Salomon LJ, Bernard JP, Duyme M, Doris B, Mas N, Ville Y. Feasibility and reproducibility of an image-scoring method for quality control of fetal biometry in the second trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 34–40
Robinson HP, Fleming JE: A critical evaluation of sonar crownrump lengths measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975 Sep; 82:702-710
Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Deter RL, et al: Fetal femur length as a predictor of menstrual age: Sonographically measured. AJR 1982 May; 138:875-878 .
Jeanty PH, Kirkpatrick C, Dramaix-Witmet M, et al: Ultrasonic evaluation of fetal limb growth. Radiology 1981 Jul; 140:165-168
Hohler CW, Quetel TA: Fetal femur length: Equations for computer calculation of gestational age from ultrasound measurements. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982 Jun; 143:479-481
Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, et al: Fetal biparietal diameter: Rational choice of plane of section for sonographic measurement. AJR 1982 May; 138:871-874
Greenes RA: OBUS: A microcomputer system for measurement, calculation, reporting, and retrieval of obstetric ultrasound examinations. Radiology 1982 Sep; 144:879-883
Gardeil F, Greene R, Stuart B, Turner MJ. Subcutaneous fat in the fetal abdomen as a predictor of growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 209–212
Poon LC, Tan MY, Yerlikaya G, Syngelaki A, Nicolaides KH. Birth weight in live births and stillbirths. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 48: 602–606
Sovio U, White IR, Dacey A, Pasupathy D, Smith GCS. Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: A prospective cohort study. Lancet 2015; 386: 2089–2097.
Khidoyatova, M. R., Kayumov, U. K., Inoyatova, F. K., Fozilov, K. G., Khamidullaeva, G. A., & Eshpulatov, A. S. (2022). Clinical status of patients with coronary artery disease post COVID-19. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 5(1), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijhms.v5n1.1858
Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2022). Post-pandemic health and its sustainability: Educational situation. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(1), i-v. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6n1.5949
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
