Correlation of skeletal and dental parameter in Sagittal plane
Keywords:
overjet, ANB, WITTS, sagittal skeletal, vertical parameterAbstract
Background: The skeletal correlations in a sagittal plane do not correlate to the dental relationship each time. For orthodontic treatment planning, differential identification In the past, the terms overjet and overbite were used to examine sagittal jaw connections. The goal of the study was to see how closely a dental characteristic (overjet) correlated with skeletal angles (ANB, WITTS). Objectives: This research aims to see if occlusal characteristics are used in evaluating cranial and facial connections in the vertical and sagittal planes. The sagittal connection of upper with lower teeth is studied using the metrics overjet. Methodology: This study is done at the orthodontics department, Institute of Dentistry, LUMHS, Jamshoro. The total sample size was 110, random sampling technique was utilized to select the subject. For the patients coming to the orthodontic department data was collected from previous and new patients. The overjet and overbite value will be measured on dental casts using vernier caliper. The impression of patient will be taken by irreversible hydrocolloid and the cast will be poured with orthodontic hard plaster. This study also includes pre-treatment digital cephalometric xrays.
Downloads
References
Broadbent H. The Face of the Normal Child. Angle Orthod. 1937;VII(04):183–208.
Finlay LM. Craniometry and cephalometry: A history prior to the advent of radiography. Angle Orthod. 1980;50(4):312–21.
Lombardo L, Sgarbanti C, Guarneri A, Siciliani G. Evaluating the correlation between overjet and skeletal parameters using DVT. Int J Dent. 2012;
Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM AJ. Contemporary Orthodontics (2018). Vol. 6th editio, Contemporary Orthodontics. 2018. 145–93 p.
Jabbar A MA. Correlation of overjet , ANB and wits appraisal for assessment of sagittal skeletal relationship. Pak Orthod J [Internet]. 2012;4(1):17–23. Available from: https://poj.org.pk/index.php/poj/article/view/57
Robert L. Vanarsdall, Jr. AGS. Orthodontics - Current Principles and Techniques - Graber 5th edition - 2011.pdf. Orthodontics - Current Principles and Techniques - Graber 5th edition -. 2011. 807–841 p.
Zupančič S, Pohar M, Farčnik F, Ovsenik M. Overjet as a predictor of sagittal skeletal relationships. Eur J Orthod. 2008;30(3):269–73.
Proffit WRJ AL. Contemporary Orthodontics. In: Contemporary Orthodontics, chapter 1. 5th editio.
Vaden JL, Dale JG KH. The Tweed-Merrifield edgewise appliance: philosophy, diagnosis and treatment. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KWL (edi). Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. 4th editio. 2005. 675–715 p.
Gul-e-Erum, Fida M. A comparison of cephalometric analyses for assessing sagittal jaw relationship. J Coll Physicians Surg Pakistan. 2008;18(11):679–83.
A. A, I. Q. Relation between centric slide and angle’s classification. J Coll Physicians Surg Pakistan [Internet]. 2005;15(8):481–4. Available from: http://www.embase.com/search/results?Subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L41288 611%0Ahttp://limo.libis.be/resolver?&sid=EMBASE&issn=1022386X&id=doi:&atitle=R elation+between+centric+slide+and+angle%27s+classification&stitle=J.+Coll.+Phys.+Sur g.+Pak.&title=
Proffi t W R , Phillips C , Tulloch J F C MPH. Surgical versus orthodontic correction of skeletal Class II malocclusion in adolescents: effects and indication. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1992;209 – 220.
Iwasaki H , Ishikawa H C. 2002 Properties of the ANB angle and the Wits appraisal in the skeletal estimation of Angle’s Class III patients. Eur J Orthod. 2002;477 – 483.
Milacic M, Markovic M. A comparative occlusal and cephalometric study of dental and skeletal anteroposterior relationships. Br J Orthod. 1983;10(1):53–4.
Pae EK, mckenna GA, Sheehan TJ, Garcia R, Kuhlberg A, Nanda R. Role of lateral cephalograms in assessing severity and difficulty of orthodontic cases. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2001;120(3):254–62.
A. Jacobson, MDS, MS P. The “Wits” appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1989;124(5):470–9.
Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod. 1953;39(10):729–55.
Riedel RA. The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion. Angle Orthod [Internet]. 1952;22(3):142–5. Available from: http://www.angle.org/doi/abs/10.1043/0003- 3219%281952%29022%3C0142%3ATROMST%3E2.0.CO%3B2
Panagiotidis G, Witt E. Der individualisierte ANB-Winkel. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1977;38(4):408–16.
Jacobson A. Application of the “Wits” appraisal. Am J Orthod. 1976;70(2):179–89.
Rushton R, Cohen AM, Linney AD. The relationship and reproducibility of angle ANB and the Wits appraisal. Br J Orthod. 1991;18(3):225–31.
CC S. The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1960;46(10):721–35.
C.Y. B, M. V. A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: The Beta angle. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop [Internet]. 2004;126(1):100–5. Available from: http://www.embase.com/search/results?Subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L38844 450%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.08.026
J.A. MJ. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod [Internet]. 1984;86(6):449–
69. Available from: http://www.embase.com/search/results?Subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L15626 061%0Ahttp://limo.libis.be/resolver?&sid=EMBASE&issn=00029416&id=doi:&atitle=A
+method+of+cephalometric+evaluation.&stitle=Am+J+Orthod&title=American+journal+ of+orthodontics&vol
Bokhari F, Asad S. Sagittal pattern and severity of skeletal discrepancy in Class II Div 1 malocclusion. Poj. 2010;2(2):66–71.
Fleming Harry. An Investigation of the Vertical Overbite During Eruption of Permanent Dentition. Angle Orthod. 1961;31(1):52–62.
Kuitert R, Beckmann S, van Loenen M, Tuinzing B, Zentner A. Dentoalveolar compensation in subjects with vertical skeletal dysplasia. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;129(5):649–57.
Hammadi AL, Labib A, Heider AM, Sultan M. Dentoskeletal overjet: A new method for assessment of sagittal jaw relation. Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 2011;5(9):1830–6.
Rasool G, Hassan N, Bashir S, Nausheen A HU. Overjet as a predictor of sagittal skeletal relationships. Pak Oral Dent J. 2016;36(3):395–8.
Naz F, Rehan C, Kamran M. Prediction of craniofacial relationship in sagittal and vertical plane using occlusal features. Pak Oral Dent J. 2017;9(1):43–9.
Staley R. Etiology and prevalence of malocclusion. Textb Orthod. 2001;8:84.
Uzuner FD, Aslan BI DM. Dentoskeletal morphology in adults with Class I, Class II Division 1, or Class II Division 2 malocclusion with increased overbite. Am J Orthod. 2019;248–56.
Ali B, Shaikh A, Fida M. Factors affecting treatment decisions for Class I malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2018;154(2):234–7.
M.M. EN, F. ES, M. B. Intrusive Arch versus Miniscrew-Supported Intrusion for Deep Bite Correction. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2019;7(11):1841–6. Available from: http://www.embase.com/search/results?Subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L20023 29731%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.332
Liu Y, Hu W. Force changes associated with different intrusion strategies for deep-bite
Correction by clear aligners. Angle Orthod. 2018;88(6):771–8.
Solow B. The dentoalveolar compensatory mechanism: background and clinical implications. Br J Orthod. 1980;7:145–61.
G. L-G, T.R. W, R.M. L, D.R. J. Anterior open-bite malocclusion: a longitudinal 10-year postretention evaluation of orthodontically treated patients. Am J Orthod [Internet]. 1985;87(3):175–86. Available from: http://www.embase.com/search/results?Subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L15648 098%0Ahttp://limo.libis.be/resolver?&sid=EMBASE&issn=00029416&id=doi:&atitle=A nterior+open-bite+malocclusion%3A+a+longitudinal+10- year+postretention+evaluation+of+orthodontical
Nahoum HI, Horowitz SL, Benedicto EA. Varieties of anterior open-bite. Am J Orthod. 1972;61(5):486–92.
Harzer W, Reinhardt A, Soltes K. “Der offene Biss”--Morphologie und therapeutische Konsequenzen. Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl. 1989;77(5):421–6.
Beckmann SH, Kuitert RB, Prahl-Andersen B, Segner D, The RP, Tuinzing DB. Alveolar and skeletal dimensions associated with overbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113(4):443–52.
Karlsen AT. Craniofacial characteristics in children with Angle Class II div. 2 malocclusion combined with extreme deep bite. Angle Orthod. 1994;64(2):123–30.
Hans MG, Martin Palomo J, Valiathan M. History of imaging in orthodontics from Broadbent to cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2015;148(6):914–21.
Proffit WR, Sarver DM, Ackerman JL. Orthodontic Diagnosis: The Development of a Problem List. 3rd editio. Contemporary Orthodontics 4ed. 2007. 167–233 p.
Broadbent BH. Measuring and recording apparatus. 1936;590,402. Available from: http://www.google.com/patents/US2032833
Tanaka JLO, Ono E, Filho Medici E, Cesar de Moraes L, Cezar de Melo Castilho J, Leonelli de Moraes ME. Influence of the facial pattern on ANB, AF-BF, and Wits appraisal. World J Orthod. 2006;7(4):369–75.
Oktay H. A comparison of ANB, WITS, AF-BF, and APDI measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1991;99(2):122–8.
W. H, R.S. N. Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB. Am J Orthod [Internet]. 1984;85(5):411–23. Available from: http://www.embase.com/search/results?Subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L14754 860%0Ahttp://limo.libis.be/resolver?&sid=EMBASE&issn=00029416&id=doi:&atitle=A nalysis+of+factors+affecting+angle+ANB.&stitle=Am+J+Orthod&title=American+journa l+of+orthodontics&
Rotberg S, Fried N, Kane J, Shapiro E. Predicting the “Wits” appraisal from the ANB angle. Am J Orthod. 1980;77(6):636–42.
Cangialosi TJ, Riolo ML, Owens SE, Dykhouse VJ, Moffitt AH, Grubb JE, et al. The ABO discrepancy index: A measure of case complexity. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2004;125(3):270–8.
Proffit WRJ AL. Contemporary Orthodontics. 3rd editio. 2000. 145–93 p.
Bishara SE, Fahl JA, Peterson LC. Longitudinal changes in the ANB angle and Wits appraisal: Clinical implications. Am J Orthod. 1983;84(2):133–9.
Del Santo M. Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of Anteroposterior jaw relationships. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;129(5):641–8.
Iwasaki H, Ishikawa H, Chowdhury L, Nakamura S, Iida J. Properties of the ANB angle and the Wits appraisal in the skeletal estimation of Angle’s Class III patients. Eur J Orthod. 2002;24(5):477–83.
Fatima F, Fida M, Shaikh A. Reliability of overbite depth indicator (ODI) and anteroposterior dysplasia indicator (APDI) in the assessment of different vertical and agittal dental malocclusions: A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Dental Press J Orthod. 2016;21(5):75–81.
Hasan A, Raslan M. The Relationship between Overjet and Skeletal Parameters in Untreated Class II Subjects. Int Arab J Dent. 2015;6(3):108–12.
Safavi SMR, Tahmasbi S SS. The association between occlusal features and craniofacial structure. J Dent Sch Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci. 2005;22(0):100–6.
Littlewood SJ. Introduction to orthodontic assessment. An Introd to Orthod. 2013;54.
AT CM and D. “Handbook of Orthodontics”. Mosby/Elsevier, Edinburgh:; 2009.
G. S. “Textbook of Orthodontics”. Second edi. Unipress Publishing; 2007.
Singh. G. “Family history”. In: Textbook of Orthodontics. Second edi. 2007. 67 p.
Góis EGO, Ribeiro HC, Vale MPP, Paiva SM, Serra-Negra JMC, Ramos-Jorge ML, et al. Influence of nonnutritive sucking habits, breathing pattern and adenoid size on the development of malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2008;78(4):647–54.
Suarez C. Risk factors for root resorptin in the orthodontic treatment. 2015;1–76.
Wilder HH. A laboratory manual of anthropometry. In: A laboratory manual of anthropometry. Philadelphia: P. Blakistons sons & Co; 2011. P. 118–193.
Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 2. Conventional angular and linear measures. Am J Orthod. 1971;60(5):505–17.
Ricketts RM. Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. The first fifty years. Angle Orthod. 1981;51(2):115–50.
Vig KD, Ellis E. Diagnosis and treatment planning for the surgical-orthodontic patient. Dent Clin North Am. 1990;34(2):361–84.
Cohen AM. Uncertainty in cephalometrics. Br J Orthod. 1984;11(1):44–8.
Cooke MS, Wei SHY. Cephalometric errors: A comparison between repeat measurements and retaken radiographs. Aust Dent J. 1991;36(1):38–43.
J SP. Reproducibility of cephalometric measurements. Br J Orthod. 1988;15:105 – 110.
Santoro M, Jarjoura K, Cangialosi TJ. Accuracy of digital and analogue cephalometric measurements assessed with the sandwich technique. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;129(3):345–51.
Ongkosuwito EM, Katsaros C, Van’t Hof MA, Bodegom JC, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. The reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: A comparison of analogue and digital methods. Eur J Orthod. 2002;24(6):655–65.
Vincent AM, West VC. Cephalometric landmark identification error. Aust Orthod J. 1987;10(2):98–104.
Forsyth DB, Davis DN. Assessment of an automated cephalometric analysis system. Eur J Orthod. 1996;18(1):471–8.
Melsen B, Baumarind S. Clinical research application of cephalometry. Orthod cephalometry. 1995;181–202.
Sayinsu K, Isik F, Trakyali G, Arun T. An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracings. Eur J Orthod.
2007;29(1):105–8.
Mitchell L, Littlewood SJ, Nelson-Moon ZL DF. Introduction to Orthodontics. Textb Orthod. 4th editio. 2013;
Whaites E DN. Essentials of Dental Radiography and Radiology. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013 Jun 20.; 2013.
Heasman P. Master of Dentistry vol.2. Toronto: Churchill Livingstone; 2007. 227 p.
British Standards Institution. British standard glossary of dental terms. British Standards Institution; 1983. 114 p.
Bhalajhi. Orthodontics The Art and Science. Vol. 53, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. Arya Medi Publishing House Pvt. Ltd; 6th edition (2015; 2013. 1689–1699 p.
Van Limborgh J. A new view of the control of the morphogenesis of the skull. Acta Morphol Neerl Scand. 1970;8(2):143–60.
Sassouni V. A classification of skeletal facial types. Am J Orthod. 1969;55(2):109–23.
Rizwan M, Mascarenhas R. A new parameter for assessing vertical skeletal discrepancies: the R angle. Rev Latinoam Ortodon Odontop. 2013;16:1–7.
Tweed CH. The frankfort-mandibular plane angle in orthodontic diagnosis, classification, treatment planning, and prognosis. Am J Orthod Oral Surg. 1946;32(4):175–230.
Downs WB. Variations in facial relationships, their significance in analysis and treatment planning. Am J Orthod. 1948;34:813–40.
Hou H, Wong R, Hagg E. The uses of orthodontic study models in diagnosis and treatment planning. Hong Kong Dent J [Internet]. 2006;3(852):107–15. Available from: http://hub.hku.hk/handle/10722/66112
Kesling HD. The diagnostic setup with consideration of the third dimension. Am J Orthod. 1956;42(10):740–8.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 International journal of health sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
