Role of Propofol with total intravenous anesthesia in intra-abdominal surgeries
A tertiary care teaching hospital based study in North India
Keywords:
high recovery, rapid induction, abdominal surgeries, propofol, total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA), anaesthesia quality, acute, haemodynamic stabilityAbstract
The analgesic properties of propofol may make it a useful opioid-sparing analgesic adjunct for colorectal surgery in the context of a multimodal analgesic regime. Propofol is a commonly used intravenous anesthetic drug. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol can be used for both induction and maintenance of general anesthesia. Propofol has been associated with pain relief both in animal studies and in human healthy volunteer studiesPostoperative pain can be severe post multiple abdominal surgeries due to the upper abdominal incision and pain management can be difficult for this group of patients,therefore total intravenous anaesthesia is a technique involving infusion and maintenance of anaesthetic state with intravenous drugs alone. But no agent has all the characteristics of ideal TIVA agent. Propofol has three important characteristics of ideal TIVA agent, i.e. rapid induction, rapid metabolism and rapid recovery. In this communication we studied the characteristics of propofol in total intravenous anaesthesia in various intra-abdominal surgeries. Vital signs, including blood pressure, oxygen saturation (SpO2), heart rate, and body temperature, were monitored in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU).
Downloads
References
Qiu Q, Choi SW, Wong SS, Irwin MG, Cheung CW. Effects of intra-operative maintenance of general anaesthesia with propofol on postoperative pain outcomes—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(10):1222-1233.
Peng K, Liu HY, Wu SR, Liu H, Zhang ZC, Ji FH. Does propofol anesthesia lead to less postoperative pain compared with inhalational anesthesia?: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2016;123(4):846-858.
Wu ZF, Jian GS, Lee MS, et al. An analysis of anesthesia-controlled operating room time after propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia compared with desfluraneanesthesia in ophthalmic surgery: a retrospective study. AnesthAnalg 2014;119:1393–406.
Lu CH, Wu ZF, Lin BF, et al. Faster extubation time with more stable hemodynamics during extubation and shorter total surgical suite time after propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia compared with desfluraneanesthesia in lengthy lumbar spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2016;24:268–74.
Antognini JF, Wang XW, Piercy M, et al. Propofol directly depresses lumbar dorsal horn neuronal responses to noxious stimulation in goats. Can J Anaesth 2000;47:273–9.
Callaghan ACO, Norman Dale JP, Grandy EM. Continuous intravenous infusion of disopropofol.Anaesthesia 1982; 37: 295-300.
Geoffrey L Dunn, David H Morrison. Propofol and thiopental as induction agents in dental outpatients. Seminars in Anaesthesia 1988; VII(1)(Suppl.1):26-28.
Doze VA, Audrey Shater BS, White PF. Propofol nitrous oxide versus thiopental-isoflurane nitrous oxide for general anaesthesia. Anaesthesiology 1988; 69: 63-71.
Coburn M, Kunitz O, Baumert HJ, Hecker K, Haat S, Zuhlsdoff A, Becker J, Rossaint R. Randomized controlled trial of the haemodynamic and recovery effects of xenon or propofolanaesthesia. Br J of Anaesthesia 2005; 94(2):198-202.
Ian H Sampson, Letkowitz Mathew, Kohren Myra et al. A comparison of propofol with methohexital for continuous intravenous anesthesia seminars in anaesthesia. 1988; VII(1)(Suppl 1): 44-46.
Watson KR and Shah MV. Clinical comparison of single agent anaesthesia with sevoflurane versus target controlled infusion of propofol. Br J Anaesthesia 2000; 85(4): 541-546.
Mackenzie N, Grant IS. Propofol (Diprivan) for continuous intravenous anaesthesia. A comparison with methohexitone. Postgraduate Medical Journal 1985; 61 (Suppl. 3): 70-75.
Dundee JW. Intravenous anaesthesia and the need for new agents.Postgrad Med J 1985; 61: 3-6.
Major E, Verniquet AJW, Waddell TK, Savege TM, Hoffler DE, Aveling W. A study of three doses of ICJ 3568 for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia, Br J Anaesth 1981; 53: 267-272.
Mirakhur RK. Induction characteristics of propofol in children: Comparison with thiopentone. Anaesthesia 1988; 43: 593-598.
Coates DP, Monk CR, Pry-Roberts C, Turtle M. Haemodynamic effects of infusions of the emulsion formulation of propofol during nitrous oxide anaesthesia in humans. AnesthAnalg 1987; 66: 64-70.
Lindgren L, Ylihankala A, Randell T, Kirvela M, Scheinin M, Neuvonen PJ. Intubation response during propofol and thiopental induction.Br J Anaesth 1993; 306-10.
Kumar G, Stendall C, Mistry R, et al. A comparison of total intravenous anaesthesia using propofol with sevoflurane or desflurane in ambulatory surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia 2014;69:1138–50.
Larson DW, Lovely JK, Cima RR, et al. Outcomes after implementation of a multimodal standard care pathway for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2014;101:1023–30.
Fassoulaki A, Melemeni A, Paraskeva A, et al. Postoperative pain and analgesic requirements after anesthesia with sevoflurane, desflurane or propofol. Anesth Analg 2008;107:1715–9.
Pokkinen SM, Yli-Hankala A, Kalliomaki ML. The effects of propofol vs. sevoflurane on post-operative pain and need of opioid. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2014;58:980–5.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.