A comparative study of honey, jaggery an ethanol as cytological fixatives

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.6651

Authors

  • Manish Aggarwal Third year post graduate student, Department of Oral pathology and microbiology, Surendera Dental College and Research Institute, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan, India
  • Manish Sharma Prof & Head, Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Surendera Dental College and Research Institute, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan, India
  • R. Karthikeyan Prof & Head, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, India
  • Manish Kumar Reader, Department of Oral pathology and microbiology, Surendera Dental College and Research Institute, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan, India
  • Gurveen Chawla Senior lecturer, Department of Oral pathology and microbiology, Surendera Dental College and Research Institute, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan, India
  • Vineet Tyagi MDS Oral Pathology, General Practitioner, New Delhi, India

Keywords:

cytological fixation, unprocessed honey, jaggery, ethanol

Abstract

The processing of cytological samples. It is the gold standard cytological fixative used in many laboratories. However, it is an expensive, volatile and flammable liquid with an irritant smell. It has also been shown to be carcinogenic in some animal models. Hence, a need to identify a safer substitute of alcohol cytological fixative is necessary. The aim of study was to analyse the efficacy of cytological smears fixed in ethanol & 20% unprocessed honey and 30% jaggery solution and to compare the efficacy between the three fixatives on staining. Three buccal smears from 50 healthy volunteers each, were collected from either cheek or tongue using wooden spatula. One of the smear was fixed in ethanol (95%) and Rapid Papanicolaou staining was done. And the other two smear was fixed in honey (20%) and Jaggery (30%) and Rapid Papanicolaou staining was done. The cytoplasmic and nuclear details were evaluated using following parameters:- nuclear staining, cytoplasmic staining, cell morphology, clarity of staining and uniformity of staining. The results were recorded by 2 independent oral pathologists.  Pearson Chi square test and Bonferroni post hoc test were used for comparison of qualitative data. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kumaresan GD, Jagannathan N. Exfoliative cytology-A predictive diagnostic tool. Int J PharmPharm Sci. 2014;6:1–3.

Pandiar D, Baranwal HC, Kumar S, Ganesan V, Sonkar PK, Chattopadhyay K. Use of jaggery and honey as adjunctive cytological fixatives to ethanol for oral smears. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2017;21(2):317. doi:10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP _224_15

Dhingra V, Mehrotra R. Historical development of oral cytology. In: Mehrotra R, editor. Oral Cytology: A Concise Guide. New York: Springer; 2013. pp. 59.

Singh A, Hunasgi S, Koneru A, Vanishree M, Ramalu S, Manvikar V. Comparison of honey with ethanol as an oral cytological fixative: A pilot study. J Cytol. 2015;32(2):113-117. doi:10.4103/0970-9371.160563

Culling CF. London: Butterworths & Co; 1963. Handbook of Histopathological and Histochemical Techniques: Including Museum Techniques.

Bhattacharyya A, Gupta B, Singh A, Sah K, Gupta V. Probing natural substitute for formalin: Comparing honey, sugar, and jaggery syrup as fixatives. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2018;9(1):14-21. doi:10.4103/njms.NJMS_57_17

Kumarasinghe MP, Constantine SR, Hemamali RL. Methanol as an alternative fixative for cytological smears. Malays J Pathol. 1997;19(2):137-140.

Olaitan PB, Adeleke OE, Ola IO. Honey: A reservoir for micro organisms and an inhibitory agent for microbes. Afr Health Sci. 2007;7:159–65

Rao PV, Madhusweta D, Das SK. Jaggery-A Traditional Indian sweetener. Indian J Tradit Knowl.2007;6:95–102.

Ozkan N, Salva E, Cakalağaoğlu F, Tüzüner B. Honey as a substitute for formalin?. Biotech Histochem. 2012;87(2):148-153. doi:10.3109/10520295. 2011.5901555

Olaitan PB, Adeleke OE, Ola IO. Honey: a reservoir for micro organisms and an inhibitory agent for microbes. Afr Health Sci. 2007;7(3):159-165. doi:10.5555/ afhs.2007.7.3.159

Sabarinath, Balaraman & Sundharam, Sivapatha & Mayilvakanam, Sathya kumar. (2014). The effectiveness of honey as a substitute for formalin in the histological fixation of tissue (vol 29, pg 173, 2006). Journal of histotechnology. 37. 107-107. 10.1179/0147888514Z.00000000091.

Lalwani V, Surekha R, Vanishree M, Koneru A, Hunasgi S, Ravikumar S. Honey as an alternative fixative for oral tissue: An evaluation of processed and unprocessed honey. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2015;19(3):342-347. doi:10.4103 /0973-029X.174641

Nerune S M, Khan M N, Potekar R M, Patil V, Natural versus synthetic fixative in oral cytological smears-A double blind study. Indian J Pathol Oncol 2018;5 (4):663-666

Piątek-Koziej K, Hołda J, Koziej M, et al. Fixative properties of honey solutions as a formaldehyde substitute in cardiac tissue preservation. Folia Med Cracov. 2019;59(1):101-114.

Srii R , Peter CD , Haragannavar VC , Shashidara R , Sridhara SU , Srivatsava S. Bee Honey as a Safer Alternative for Routine Formalin Fixation. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2017;15(60):308-312.

Kumarasinghe MP, Constantine SR, Hemamali RL. Methanol as an alternative fixative for cytological smears. Malays J Pathol. 1997;19:137–40

Patil S, Rao RS, Ganavi BS, Majumdar B. Natural sweeteners as fixatives in histopathology: Alongitudinal study. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2015;6:67–70.

Patil S, Premalatha B, Rao RS, Ganavi B. Revelation in the field of tissue preservation–A preliminary study on natural formalin substitutes. J Int Oral Health. 2013;5:31–8

Olaitan PB, Adeleke OE, Ola IO. Honey: A reservoir for microorganisms and an inhibitory agent for microbes. Afr Health Sci. 2007;7:159–65

Rao PV, Madhusweta D, Das SK. Jaggery-A Traditional Indian sweetener. Indian J Tradit Knowl.2007;6:95–102

Sabarinath B, Sivapathasundharam B, Sathyakumar M. Fixative properties of honey in comparison with formalin. J Histotechnol. 2014;37:21–5

Patil S, Rao RS, Agarwal A, Raj AT. Instant transport media for biopsied soft tissue specimens: A comparative study. Scientifica (Cairo) 2015;2015:876531.

Al-Jabri AA, Nzeako B, Al Mahrooqi Z, Al Naqdy A, Nsanze H. In vitro anti-bacterial activity of Omani and African honey. Br J Biomed Sci. 2003;60:1–4

Wakefield JC. London: Health Protection Agency (HPA); 2008. Formal dehyde-toxicological overview.

Al Somai N, Coley KE, Molan PC, Hancock BM. Susceptility of helicobacter pylori to the antibacterial activity of manuka honey. Russ Med J. 1994;87:9–12

Allen KL, Molan PC, Reid GM. A survey of the antibacterial activity of some New Zeal and honeys. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1991;43:817–22

Gunter M, Bryant P. Immunohistochemical evaluation of ductal carcinoma in breast after preservation in honey. J Histotechnol. 2009;32:54–9

Atlanta, US: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1999. Toxico-logical Profile for Formaldehyde. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR)

Molan PC. Why honey is effective as a medicine. Its use in modern medicine. Bee World.1999;80:80–92

McCarthy J. The antibacterial effects of honey. Am Bee J. 1995:171–2

Published

27-04-2022

How to Cite

Aggarwal, M., Sharma, M., Karthikeyan, R., Kumar, M., Chawla, G., & Tyagi, V. (2022). A comparative study of honey, jaggery an ethanol as cytological fixatives. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S3), 3902–3914. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.6651

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)