Assessment of interoperator variability in shade selection using two shade guides

An observational study

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS8.9945

Authors

  • Ravinder Singh Saini Associate Professor COAMS, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
  • Kanwalpreet Kaur MDS, Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Consultant Pediatric Dentist, Ludhiana, Punjab

Keywords:

variability, shade, guide

Abstract

Background: Shade determination for direct and indirect restorations has always been a challenging aspect of esthetic dentistry. Hence; the present study was conducted for assessing Interoperator Variability in Shade Selection using Two Shade Guides. Materials & methods: Two different shade guides used were: Shade Guide 1- Vitapan classical shade guide and Shade Guide 2-VITA toothguide 3D-Master shade guide. A total of 40 subjects were enrolled. Only those subjects were enrolled which had healthy maxillary right permanent central incisor. Two independent operators participated in the study.  Each subject was seated upright in the dental chair and the middle third portion of the maxillary right central incisor teeth to be matched was slightly moistened. The percentage of variability in shade selection between the operators was calculated. All the results were subjected to statistical analysis. Results: For shade guide 1, kappa value and interpersonal variability was 0.89 and 16% respectively. For shade guide 2, kappa value and interpersonal variability was 0.71 and 29% respectively. Hence; interpersonal variability was higher for shade guide 2 in comparison to shade guide 1. Conclusion: From the above results, the authors concluded that VITA Toothguide 3D-Master showed higher variability in comparison with Vita lumen shade guide.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Paul S, Peter A, Pietrobon N, Hämmerle CH. Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth. J Dent Res. 2002;81:578–82.

van der Burgt TP, ten Bosch JJ, Borsboom PC, Plasschaert AJ. A new method for matching tooth colors with color standards. J Dent Res. 1985;64:837–41.

Witkowski S, Yajima ND, Wolkewitz M, Strub JR. Reliability of shade selection using an intraoral spectrophotometer. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16:945–9.

Paravina RD. Evaluation of a newly developed visual shade-matching apparatus. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:528–34.

Ishikawa-Nagai S, Ishibashi K, Tsuruta O, Weber H-P. Reproducibility of tooth color gradation using a computer color-matching technique applied to ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:129–37.

Dozic A, Kleverlaan CJ, El-Zohairy A, Feilzer AJ, Khashayar G. Performance of five commercially available tooth color-measuring devices. J Prosthodont 2007;16:93–100.

Ruyter IE, Nilner K, Moller B. Color stability of dental composite resin materials for crown and bridge veneers. Dent Mater 1987;3:246–51.

Sproull RC. Color matching in dentistry. II. Practical applications of the organization of color. J Prosthet Dent. 1973;29:556–66.

Seghi RR, Johnston WM, O'Brien WJ. Performance assessment of colorimetric devices on dental porcelains. J Dent Res. 1989;68:1755–9.

Hammad IA. Intrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides. J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Jan;89(1):50-3. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.60.

Nakhaei M, Ghanbarzadeh J, Amirinejad S. The Influence of Dental Shade Guides and Experience on the Accuracy of Shade Matching. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Jan 1;17(1):22-6.

Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2021). Health and treatment of diabetes mellitus. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(1), i-v. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5n1.2864

Akbarov, A. N., & Xabilov, D. N. U. (2021). The condition of the oral cavity in patients who have had a viral infection COVID-19. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 4(4), 381-383. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijhms.v4n4.1796

Published

29-06-2022

How to Cite

Saini, R. S., & Kaur, K. (2022). Assessment of interoperator variability in shade selection using two shade guides: An observational study. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S8), 923–926. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS8.9945

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)