Evaluation of flexural strength of glass carbomer cement and conventional glass ionomer cement

A comparative study

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS8.9947

Authors

  • Ravinder Singh Saini Associate Professor COAMS, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
  • Kanwalpreet Kaur MDS, Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Consultant Pediatric Dentist, Ludhiana, Punjab

Keywords:

glass ionomer cement, carbomer, flexural strength

Abstract

Background: The conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) has been advocated as a restorative material because of its ability to chemically bond to tooth structures and release fluoride.Recently, glass carbomer cement, a GIC-based restorative material, has been introduced with claims of improved physical characteristics. Hence; the present study was conducted for comparing the Flexural Strength of Glass Carbomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement.Materials & methods: The present study was conducted for comparing the Flexural Strength of Glass Carbomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement. Study moulds were made out of silicone putty material. Stainless steel scaffolding was used for creating a mould of desired dimensions.  Total 40 specimens were prepared and divided into two study groups with 20 specimens in each group. One group was of conventional GIC while the other group was GCC.After preparation of the specimen, testing of flexural strength was done using universal force testing machine. All the results were recorded, analysed and compared. Results: Mean flexural strength of GIC and GCC was 28.3 MPa and 26.9 MPa respectively. Non-significant results were obtained while comparing the mean flexural strength of GIC and GCC. Conclusion: Flexural strength of glass carbomer cement was similar to conventional glass ionomer cement. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Smith DC. Polyacrylic acid-based cements-adhesion to enamel and dentin. Oper Dent. 1992;(Suppl 5):177–183.

Erickson RL, Glasspoole EA. Bonding to tooth structure: a comparison of glassionomer and composite-resin systems. J Esthet Dent. 1994;6:227–244.

Nikolaos K, Vassiliki T, Christine T, Eirini T. The early fluoride release pattern of an aged glass ionomer treated with fluoride. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2007;15:135–141.

Hotta M, Hirukawa H, Yamamoto K. Effect of coating materials on restorative glassionomer cement surface. Oper Dent. 1992;17:57–61.

Watson T, Banerjee A. Effectiveness of glassionomer surface protection treatments: a scanning optical microscope study. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 1993;2:85–90.

Using glass ionomers Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. J Am Dent Assoc. 1990;121:181–188.

Guelmann M, Bonnin S, Primosch RE, Söderholm KJ. Microleakage and wall adaptation of conservative restorations. Am J Dent. 2002;15:407–411.

Chen X, Cuijpers V, Fan M, Frencken JE. Marginal leakage of two newer glassionomer-based sealant materials assessed using micro-CT. J Dent. 2010;38:731–735.

Davidovich E, Weiss E, Fuks AB, Beyth N. Surface antibacterial properties of glass ionomer cements used in atraumatic restorative treatment. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138:1347–1352.

Faridi MA, Khabeer A, Haroon S. Flexural Strength of Glass Carbomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement Stored in Different Storage Media over Time. Med Princ Pract. 2018;27(4):372-377.

Hasan MHR, Sidhu SK. Fluoride release and uptake in enhanced bioactivity glass ionomer cement (“glass carbomer™”) compared with conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019; 27: e20180230.

Sofija, G., & Ivan, T. (2018). Quality of life in children with disabilities placed in foster families. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 1(1), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijhms.v1n1.35

Widana, I.K., Sumetri, N.W., Sutapa, I.K., Suryasa, W. (2021). Anthropometric measures for better cardiovascular and musculoskeletal health. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(3), 550–561. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22202

Published

29-06-2022

How to Cite

Saini, R. S., & Kaur, K. (2022). Evaluation of flexural strength of glass carbomer cement and conventional glass ionomer cement: A comparative study. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S8), 932–936. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS8.9947

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)