The best paradigm for nursing research

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS4.6483

Authors

  • María del Rosario Herrera Velázquez Universidad Estatal del Sur de Manabí, Jipijapa, Manabí, Ecuador
  • María Liliana Calderón Macías Universidad Estatal del Sur de Manabí, Jipijapa, Manabí, Ecuador
  • Aida Monserratec Macías Alvia Universidad Estatal del Sur de Manabí, Jipijapa, Manabí, Ecuador
  • Alfredo Dencel Macías Estrella Ministerio de Salud Pública, Portoviejo, Manabí, Ecuador
  • David Marinely Sequera Universidad Nacional de Educación, El Cañar, Azogues

Keywords:

Philosophy, Nursing, nursing theory, Nursing Research

Abstract

Reflects on the best approach of the paradigms in nursing research, which allows human phenomena to emerge and through them generate knowledge for this discipline. The systematic review was carried out of 25 documents, analyzing the hermeneutical positivist and interpretive approach to nursing research. According to the analyzed documents and in knowledge of the multiplicity and multidimensionality of phenomena related to the care of the human health experience, which is the object of study of nursing, one of these two paradigms could not be qualified as the best, since it would be foolish accepting one of them or thinking that one is better than another, even more so at the time science is currently going through. Paradigms will quantitative or positivist and qualitative or interpretive hermeneutic prevail to the extent that nursing science requires it.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agrazal García, J. (2019). Research: essential element for the disciplinary development of nursing. Focus Magazine, XXIV(20), 35-46. http://up-rid.up.ac.pa/3252/1/1988

Burgo Bencomo, OB, León González, JL, Cáceres Mesa, ML, Pérez Maya, CJ, & Espinoza Freire, EE (2019). Some thoughts on research and educational intervention. Cuban Journal of Military Medicine, 48(2), 316-330. https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/revcubmedmil/cmm-2019/cmms191c.pdf

Castillo Lobos, L., & Pavez Lizarraga, A. (2021). The epistemological place of Nursing as art from an Aristotelian perspective. Culture of Caring, 25(60), 128-139. https://rua.ua.es/dspace/bitstream/10045/116421/1/CultCuid60_10.pdf

Chinn, P., & Kraemer, M. (1995). Theory and Nursing: A Systematic Approach (M.-Y. Book (ed.); 4th ed.).

Duran de Villalobos, M.M. (2018). Looking Outward: Projecting Nursing to 2050. Aquichan, 18(1), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.5294/here.2018.18.1.1. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/741/74155410001/74155410001.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/aqui.2018.18.1.1

Escobar-Castellanos, B., & Sanhueza-Alvarado, O. (2018). Carper knowledge patterns and expression in nursing care. Humanized Care, 7, 57-72. http://scielo.edu.uy/pdf/ech/v7n1/en_2393-6606-ech-7-01-27.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.22235/ech.v7i1.1540

Estrada Zapata, K. (2020). Critical thinking: concept and its importance in Nursing education. Nursing Index, 28(4), 204-208. https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1132-12962019000300009&lng=es&tlng=es

Fawcett, J., & Lee, RC (2014). Advancing Nursing Knowledge: A Response to Burns' Letter to the Editor. Nursing Science Quarterly, 27(1), 88-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318413510636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318413510636

Freitez R., J.A. (2019). Qualitative research in nursing from the perspective of the student. Health, Art and Care, 12(2), 91-94. https://revistas.uclave.org/index.php/sac/article/view/3461/2176

Galindo Alba, A., Misa Borrego, E., & Núñez Valdés, J. (2018). Politics, media and the teaching of Statistics. InnovaMath, 1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5944/pim.1.2018.21927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/pim.1.2018.21927

Guia-Yanes, MA (2019). Nursing: evolution, art, discipline, science and profession. Vive Journal of Health Research, 2(4), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.33996/revistavive.v2i4.22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33996/revistavive.v2i4.22

Herrera Velázquez, M. del R., Sánchez Bravo, JF, Pico Bermúdez, CL, Villacreses Mendoza, PR, & Barberán Murillo, KI (2020). Management of the nursing processes of internal students in the confrontation of the COVID-19. International journal of health sciences, 4(2), 24-30. http://sciencescholar.us/journal/index.php/ijhs/article/view/441 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29332/ijhs.v4n2.441

Jackson, J., Anderson, JE, & Maben, J. (2021). What is nursing work? A meta-narrative review and integrated framework. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 122, 103944. https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0020748921000870?token=7249CA364FC9FC7924CC88A32A446C245C54A66A8B13FF39B91F7BEE6940B0B06CA1B79D392BB4B206FC10917552D6FB&originRegion=us-east-1&originCreation=20220328223927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103944

Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Fund of Economic Culture.

Martinez Diaz, J.D. (2020). Conceptual framework of nursing. In U. de Almería (Ed.), Theory and Practice of Nursing Fundamentals (pp. 57-66).

Monti, E., & Tingen, M. (2009). Multiple Paradigms of Nursing Science. In Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession (pp. 433-448).

Park, YS, Konge, L., &. Artino, A.R. (2020). The Positivism Paradigm of Research Academic Medicine, 95(5), 690-94.https://journals-lww-com.udea.lookproxy.com/academicmedicine/Fulltext/2020/05000/The_Positivism_Paradigm_of_Research.16.aspx DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003093

Piza Burgos, ND, Amaiquema Márquez, FA, & Beltrán Baquerizo, GE (2019). Methods and techniques in qualitative research. Some necessary precisions. Conrad Magazine, 15(70), 455-459. https://conrado.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/conrado/article/view/1162/1167

Sánchez Flores, FA (2019). Epistemic Foundations of Qualitative and Quantitative Research: Consensus and Dissent. Digital Journal of Research in University Teaching, 13(1), 101-122. http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2223-25162019000100008

Smith, MC (2019). Regenerating Nursing's Disciplinary Perspective. Advances in Nursing Science, 42(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000241 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000241

Thanh Tuyen, LT (2018). Toward an Understanding of Nursing Knowledge Development. Belitung Nursing Journal, 4(1), 1-7. https://www.belitungraya.org/BRP/index.php/bnj/article/view/402/pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.402

Triviño V., Z., & Sanhueza A., O. (2005). Paradigms of Nursing Research. Science and Nursing, 11(1), 8. 03.22.12. https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?pid=S0717-95532005000100003&script=sci_arttext

Urra, E., & Hernández, A. (2015). The Nature of Nursing Knowledge: Reflections for the Debate of a Better Understanding of Care. Science and Nursing, 3, 113-122. https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-95532015000300010

Veliz, L., Ceballos, P., Valenzuela, S., & Sanhueza, O. ( 2012). Critical analysis of the positivist paradigm and its influence on the development of nursing. Nursing Index. 21 (4). https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1132-12962012000300010

Younas, A., & Parsons, K. (2019). Implications for paradigm shift in nursing: A critical analysis of Thomas Kuhn's revolutionary science and its relevance to nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 42(3), 243-254. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000244. https://journals-lww-com.udea.lookproxy.com/advancesinnursingscience/Fulltext/2019/07000/Implications_for_Paradigm_Shift_in_Nursing__A.9.aspx DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000244

Published

24-04-2022

How to Cite

Velázquez, M. del R. H., Macías, M. L. C., Alvia, A. M. M., Estrella, A. D. M., & Sequera, D. M. (2022). The best paradigm for nursing research. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S4), 1817–1824. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS4.6483

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)