Recent developments in orthodontic treatment-an overview
Keywords:
orthodontic treatment, growth modification, skeletal discrepancies, mixed-dentition, malocclusion, early intervention, functional appliancesAbstract
Background: Recent developments in orthodontic treatment have significantly impacted the management of various dental and skeletal issues in preadolescent patients. These advancements encompass a wide range of approaches aimed at addressing problems during the mixed-dentition phase, particularly skeletal discrepancies. Growth modification, camouflage, and orthognathic surgery are primary strategies used to correct these discrepancies. Aim: The aim of this overview is to present a comprehensive summary of recent developments in orthodontic treatment, focusing on growth modification strategies applied to address skeletal and dental issues in preadolescent patients. Methods: This overview examines various orthodontic treatment methods, including growth modification techniques such as the use of headgear, functional appliances, and orthognathic surgery. The discussion also explores the application of these methods to different types of malocclusions and skeletal discrepancies, particularly anteroposterior, transverse, and vertical problems.
Downloads
References
Proffit, W. R., Fields, H. W., & Sarver, D. M. (2012). Contemporary orthodontics (5th ed.). Mosby-Year Book.
Proffit, W. R., White, R. P., & Sarver, D. M. (2003). Contemporary treatment of dentofacial deformity. Mosby-Year Book.
Hagg, U., Pancherz, H., & Taranger, J. (1987). Pubertal growth and orthodontic treatment. In D. S. Carlson & K. A. Ribbens (Eds.), Craniofacial growth during adolescence (Monograph 20, Craniofacial Growth Series). Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan.
Baccetti, T., Franchi, L., & McNamara, J. A., Jr. (2002). An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth. Angle Orthodontist, 72(4), 316–323.
Chertkow, S. (1980). Tooth mineralization as an indicator of the pubertal growth. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 77, 79–91.
Thompson, G. W., Popovich, F., & Anderson, D. L. (1976). Maximum growth changes in mandibular length, stature, and weight. Human Biology, 48, 285–293.
Anderson, G., Fields, H. W., Beck, F. M., et al. (2006). Development of cephalometric norms using a unified facial and dental approach. Angle Orthodontist, 76, 557–563.
Tulloch, J. F. C., Phillips, C., & Proffit, W. R. (1998). Benefit of early class II treatment: Progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 113, 62–72.
De Clerk, H., & Proffit, W. (2015). Growth modification of the face: A current perspective with emphasis on class III treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 148, 37–46.
O’Brien, K., Wright, J., Conboy, F., et al. (2003). Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the twin-block appliance: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 2: Psychosocial effects. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 124(5), 488–494.
Liu, Z., McGrath, C., & Hägg, U. (2009). The impact of malocclusion/orthodontic treatment need on the quality of life: A systematic review. Angle Orthodontist, 79(3), 585–591.
Kiyak, H. A. (2008). Does orthodontic treatment affect patients’ quality of life? Journal of Dental Education, 72(8), 886–894.
Thiruvenkatachari, B., Harrison, J., Worthington, H., et al. (2015). Early orthodontic treatment for class II malocclusion reduces the chance of incisal trauma: Results of a Cochrane systematic review. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 148, 47–59.
Koroluk, L. D., Tulloch, J. F., & Phillips, C. (2003). Incisor trauma and early treatment for class II division 1 malocclusion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 123, 117–126.
Baumrind, S., Korn, E. L., Isaacson, R. J., et al. (1983). Quantitative analysis of the orthodontics and orthopedic effects of maxillary traction. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 84, 384–398.
Bookstein, F. L. (1982). On the cephalometrics of skeletal change. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 82, 177–198.
O’Brien, K., Wright, J., Conboy, F., et al. (2003). Effectiveness of treatment for class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: A randomized, controlled trial. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 124, 128–137.
Luzi, C., Luzi, V., & Melsen, B. (2013). Mini-implants and the efficiency of Herbst treatment: A preliminary study. Progress in Orthodontics, 14(1), 21.
McNamara, J. A., Bookstein, F. L., & Shaughnessy, T. G. (1985). Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on class II patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 88, 91–110.
Remmer, H. R., Manandras, A. N., Hunter, W. S., et al. (1985). Cephalometric changes associated with treatment using the activator, the Frankel appliance, and the fixed appliance. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 88, 363–372.
Keeling, S. D., Wheeler, T. T., King, G. J., et al. (1998). Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early class II treatment with bionators and headgear. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 113, 40–50.
Baumrind, S., & Korn, E. L. (1981). Patterns of change in mandibular and facial shape associated with the use of forces to retract the maxilla. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 80, 31–47.
Southard, T., Marshall, S., Allareddy, V., et al. (2013). An evidence-based comparison of headgear and functional appliance therapy for the correction of class II malocclusions. Seminars in Orthodontics, 19, 174–195.
Turley, P. K. (1988). Orthopedic correction of class III malocclusion with palatal expansion and custom protraction headgear. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, 22, 314–325.
Kim, J. H., Viana, M. A., Graber, T. M., et al. (1999). The effectiveness of protraction facemask therapy: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 115, 675–685.
Vaughn, G. A., Mason, B., Moon, H. B., et al. (2005). The effects of maxillary protraction therapy with or without rapid palatal expansion: A prospective, randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 128, 299–309.
Sar, C., Arman-Özçırpıcı, A., Uçkan, S., et al. (2011). Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 139, 636–649.
Nguyen, T., Cevidanes, L., Cornelis, M. A., et al. (2011). Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary changes associated with bone anchored maxillary protraction. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 139, 790–798.
Cha, K. S. (2003). Skeletal changes of maxillary protraction in patients exhibiting skeletal class III malocclusion: A comparison of three skeletal maturation groups. Angle Orthodontist, 73, 26–35.
Baik, H. S. (1995). Clinical results of the maxillary protraction in Korean children. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 108, 583–592.
Merwin, D., Ngan, P., Hagg, U., et al. (1997). Timing for effective application of anteriorly directed orthopedic force to the maxilla. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 112, 292–299.
Wells, A. P., Sarver, D. M., & Proffit, W. R. (2006). Long-term efficacy of reverse pull headgear therapy. Angle Orthodontist, 76, 915–922.
Sakamoto, T., Iwase, I., Uka, A., et al. (1984). A roentgenocephalometric study of skeletal changes during and after chin cap treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 85, 341–350.
Sugawara, J., Asano, T., Endo, N., et al. (1990). Long-term effects of chincup therapy on skeletal profile in mandibular prognathism. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 98, 127–133.
Jamilian, A., Cannavale, R., Piancino, M., et al. (2016). Methodological quality and outcome of systematic reviews reporting on orthopaedic treatment for class III malocclusion: Overview of systematic reviews. Journal of Orthodontics, 43, 102–120.
Kilic, N., Kiki, A., & Oktay, H. (2008). Condylar asymmetry in unilateral posterior crossbite patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 133, 382–387.
Bell, R., & LeCompte, E. (1981). The effects of maxillary expansion using a quad helix appliance during the deciduous and mixed detentions. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 79, 152–161.
Haas, A. J. (1965). The treatment of maxillary deficiency by opening the midpalatal suture. Angle Orthodontist, 35, 200–217.
Hicks, E. (1978). Slow maxillary expansion: A clinical study of the skeletal versus the dental response to low magnitude force. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 73, 121–141.
Brunetto, M., Andriani, J. da S., Ribeiro, G. L., et al. (2013). Three-dimensional assessment of buccal alveolar bone after rapid and slow maxillary expansion: A clinical trial study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 143(5), 633–644.
Fields, H. W., Proffit, W. R., Nixon, W. L., et al. (1984). Facial pattern differences in long-faced children and adults. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 85, 217–223.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.